Loss to Follow-up in Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treated with Anti-VEGF Therapy in the United States in the IRIS® Registry

被引:19
作者
Khurana, Rahul N. [1 ,2 ]
Li, Charles [3 ]
Lum, Flora [3 ]
机构
[1] Northern Calif Retina Vitreous Associates, 2495 Hosp Dr, Suite 545, Mountain View, CA 94040 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Ophthalmol, San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Amer Acad Ophthalmol, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
Adherence; Anti-VEGF therapy; Loss to follow-up; Neovascular AMD; Nonpersistence; GROWTH-FACTOR THERAPY; RANIBIZUMAB; OUTCOMES; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.02.021
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the incidence of being lost to follow-up (LTFU) and nonpersistence in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) treated with anti-VEGF injections in the United States. Design: Retrospective cohort study using the IRIS & REG; (Intelligent Research in Sight) Registry data. Participants: One hundred fifty-six thousand three hundred twenty-seven treatment-naive patients with neovascular AMD who subsequently were treated with anti-VEGF therapy from 2013 through 2015 and followed up through 2019. Methods: Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% con-fidence intervals (CIs). Main Outcome Measures: Being LTFU was defined as no follow-up within 12 months from last intravitreal injection. Nonpersistence was defined as no follow-up within 6 months from last intravitreal injection. Results: For neovascular AMD, 11.6% of patients (95% CI, 11.4%-11.7%) were LTFU, and 88.4% of pa-tients were followed up within 12 months. The rate of being LTFU generally was higher with increasing age, with odds of being LTFU greatest for patients between 81 and 84 years of age (OR, 2.51; 95% CI, 2.31-2.74; P < 0.001) compared with patients 70 years of age and younger. Odds of being LTFU for Black or African American patients (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.08-1.61; P = 0.007) were greater than for White patients. Odds of being LTFU were higher for patients with Medicaid insurance (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.01-1.60; P = 0.04) and lower for patients with Medicare Fee-For-Service insurance (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.64-0.74; P < 0.001) than for patients with private insurance. Furthermore, 14.3% (95% CI, 14.1-14.4) of patients were nonpersistent, and 85.7% of patients un-derwent follow-up within 6 months. Odds of nonpersistence also were greatest among patients between 81 and 84 years of age (OR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.98-2.29; P < 0.001) compared with patients 70 years of age or younger. Odds of nonpersistence for Black or African-American patients (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.15-1.65; P < 0.001) and Hispanic patients (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.03-1.24; P = 0.009) were greater than odds for White patients. Conclusions: Nearly 1 of 9 patients with neovascular AMD treated with anti-VEGF injections became LTFU, whereas 1 of 7 patients were nonpersistent. Risk factors identified included increasing age, male sex, unilateral involvement, diabetes, Medicaid insurance, and race or ethnicity. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references. Ophthalmology 2023;130:672-683 & COPY; 2023 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology
引用
收藏
页码:672 / 683
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Application of Automated Quantification of Fluid Volumes to Anti-VEGF Therapy of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration [J].
Schmidt-Erfurth, Ursula ;
Vogl, Wolf-Dieter ;
Jampol, Lee Merrill ;
Bogunovic, Hrvoje .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 127 (09) :1211-1219
[32]   Specific alterations in the retinal microstructure in neovascular age-related macular degeneration under anti-VEGF therapy [J].
Schneiderbauer, T. ;
Ahlers, C. ;
Stock, G. ;
Golbaz, I. ;
Schuetze, C. ;
Sacu, S. ;
Schmidt-Erfurth, U. .
OPHTHALMOLOGE, 2011, 108 (01) :38-+
[33]   Maintenance of Vision Needed to Drive after Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Therapy in Patients with Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Macular Edema [J].
Emami-Naeini, Parisa ;
Garmo, Vincent ;
Boucher, Nick ;
Fernando, Rusirini ;
Menezes, Alicia .
OPHTHALMOLOGY RETINA, 2024, 8 (04) :388-398
[34]   Anti-VEGF and Other Novel Therapies for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: An Update [J].
Parravano, Mariacristina ;
Costanzo, Eliana ;
Scondotto, Giulia ;
Trifiro, Gianluca ;
Virgili, Gianni .
BIODRUGS, 2021, 35 (06) :673-692
[35]   Anti-VEGF agents for age-related macular degeneration [J].
Ozkiris, Abdullah .
EXPERT OPINION ON THERAPEUTIC PATENTS, 2010, 20 (01) :103-118
[36]   Central retinal thickness fluctuations in patients treated with anti-VEGF for neovascular age related macular degeneration [J].
Ciucci, Francesco ;
Ioele, Giuseppina ;
Bardocci, Antonio ;
Lofoco, Giorgio ;
Antonelli, Barbara ;
De Gaetano, Cristiano ;
Polimanti, Gabriele ;
De Luca, Michele ;
Ragno, Gaetano ;
Gattegna, Roberto .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 32 (04) :2388-2394
[37]   Onset of Retinal Pigment Epithelium Atrophy Subsequent to Anti-VEGF Therapy in Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration [J].
Sitnilska, Vasilena ;
Altay, Lebriz ;
Enders, Philip ;
Hermann, Manuel ;
Muether, Philipp S. ;
Fauser, Sascha .
OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2019, 241 (03) :154-160
[38]   Short-Term Outcomes of Faricimab in Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration on Prior Anti-VEGF Therapy [J].
Szigiato, Andrei ;
Mohan, Nitesh ;
Talcott, Katherine E. ;
Mammo, Danny A. ;
Babiuch, Amy S. ;
Kaiser, Peter K. ;
Ehlers, Justis P. ;
Rachitskaya, Aleksandra ;
Yuan, Alex ;
Srivastava, Sunil K. ;
Sharma, Sumit .
OPHTHALMOLOGY RETINA, 2024, 8 (01) :10-17
[39]   Longer-Term Anti-VEGF Therapy Outcomes in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Diabetic Macular Edema, and Vein Occlusion-Related Macular Edema [J].
Ciulla, Thomas A. ;
Hussain, Rehan M. ;
Taraborelli, Donna ;
Pollack, John S. ;
Williams, David F. .
OPHTHALMOLOGY RETINA, 2022, 6 (09) :796-806
[40]   Genetic predictive biomarkers of anti-VEGF treatment response in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration [J].
Fauser, Sascha ;
Lambrou, George N. .
SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 60 (02) :138-152