A subgroup dominance-based benefit of the doubt method for addressing rank reversals: A case study of the human development index in Europe

被引:19
作者
Su, Weihua [1 ]
Chen, Sibo [2 ]
Zhang, Chonghui [1 ]
Li, Kevin W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Coll Stat & Math, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Polytech Univ, Sch Math & Phys, Wuhu 241000, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Windsor, Odette Sch Business, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Rank reversal; Benefit of the doubt; Subgroup dominance; Human development index; Composite indicators; COMPOSITE INDICATORS; CONSTRUCTION; PERFORMANCE; EFFICIENCY; DEA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2022.11.030
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The benefit of the doubt (BoD) is a non-parametric weighting method that aims to maximize the relative composite indicator value of each decision-making unit (DMU). A well-known issue of BoD-based ranking of DMUs is the rank reversal problem when DMUs are deleted or added. The fundamental reason for rank reversals is that deleting (or adding) a DMU influences the generated weight by changing the frontier surface. To address the rank reversal problem, this paper proposes a subgroup dominance-based BoD model (SD-BoD). Based on the individual weights obtained from a classic BoD model, a dominance-based pairwise comparison mechanism is put forward to ensure comparability of different DMUs. Moreover, motivated by the data envelopment analysis idea, we construct a sequential frontier surface partition technique and establish a DMU ranking framework based on subgroup dominance, which helps reduce weight variation due to DMU addition or deletion. Finally, the effectiveness of the SD-BoD method is illustrated by comparing and analyzing the Human Development Indices of the 28 European regions.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1299 / 1317
页数:19
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Operationalizing a concept: The systematic review of composite indicator building for measuring community disaster resilience [J].
Asadzadeh, A. ;
Koetter, T. ;
Salehi, P. ;
Birkmann, J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2017, 25 :147-162
[2]   When, where and how to perform efficiency estimation [J].
Badunenko, Oleg ;
Henderson, Daniel J. ;
Kumbhakar, Subal C. .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2012, 175 :863-892
[3]  
BARZILAI J, 1994, INFOR, V32, P57
[4]   A new sustainable human development indicator for small island developing states: A reappraisal from data envelopment analysis [J].
Blancard, Stephane ;
Hoarau, Jean-Francois .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2013, 30 :623-635
[5]   Batten Down the Hatches-Assessing the Status of Emergency Preparedness Planning in the German Water Supply Sector with Statistical and Expert-Based Weighting [J].
Bross, Lisa ;
Wienand, Ina ;
Krause, Steffen .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (17)
[6]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444
[7]   Composite Index Construction with Expert Opinion [J].
Chen, Rong ;
Ji, Yuanyuan ;
Jiang, Guolin ;
Xiao, Han ;
Xie, Ruoqing ;
Zhu, Pingfang .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2022, 41 (01) :67-79
[8]   Creating composite indicators with DEA and robustness analysis: the case of the Technology Achievement Index [J].
Cherchye, L. ;
Moesen, W. ;
Rogge, N. ;
Van Puyenbroeck, T. ;
Saisana, M. ;
Saltelli, A. ;
Liska, R. ;
Tarantola, S. .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2008, 59 (02) :239-251
[9]   An introduction to 'benefit of the doubt' composite indicators [J].
Cherchye, Laurens ;
Moesen, Willem ;
Rogge, Nicky ;
Van Puyenbroeck, Tom .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2007, 82 (01) :111-145
[10]   Cardinal Consistency of Reciprocal Preference Relations: A Characterization of Multiplicative Transitivity [J].
Chiclana, Francisco ;
Herrera-Viedma, Enrique ;
Alonso, Sergio ;
Herrera, Francisco .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2009, 17 (01) :14-23