Snap bean response to pyroxasulfone in a diversity panel

被引:0
|
作者
Williams II, Martin M. [1 ,3 ]
Saballos, Ana [1 ]
Peachey, R. Ed [2 ]
机构
[1] Agr Res Serv, US Dept Agr, Global Change & Photosynth Res, Urbana, IL USA
[2] Oregon State Univ, Dept Hort, Corvallis, OR USA
[3] ARS, SDA, 1102 S Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
Pyroxasulfone; sulfentrazone; snap bean; Phaseolus vulgaris L; Crop tolerance; cultivar sensitivity; genotype; phenotype; heritability; HERBICIDE;
D O I
10.1017/wet.2023.12
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
If available for use on snap bean, pyroxasulfone would provide valuable preemergence control of troublesome weed species that currently contaminate the crop postharvest. The extent to which snap bean tolerates pyroxasulfone is poorly documented. The objective of this research was to quantify the extent to which pyroxasulfone tolerance exists in a large collection of snap bean cultivars. A snap bean diversity panel of 277 entries was screened for tolerance to sulfentrazone at a rate of 420 g ai ha(-1) in a field trial in 2019 and 2020 near Urbana, IL. Snap bean cultivars exhibited variation in tolerance to pyroxasulfone. While a handful of cultivars were tolerant across variable environments, most cultivars were sensitive in the year that had 30% more water supply (rainfall plus sprinkler irrigation) within 3 wk of planting. Low estimates of broad-sense heritability reflect a large influence of the environment on seedling emergence and growth. With a few exceptions, currently, the margin of crop safety across diverse germplasm is insufficient for registration of pyroxasulfone use on snap bean crops.
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 88
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] BLIGHTS OF SNAP BEAN IN GEORGIA
    LUTTRELL, ES
    GARREN, KH
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1952, 42 (11) : 607 - 613
  • [22] SNAP BEAN HERBICIDE TRIALS
    MULLINS, CA
    SWINGLE, HD
    TENNESSEE FARM & HOME SCIENCE, 1978, (106): : 17 - 18
  • [23] SNAP BEAN STUDIES, 1981
    GONZALEZ, AR
    SISTRUNK, WA
    ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION MIMEOGRAPH SERIES, 1982, (299): : 1 - 14
  • [24] New snap bean varieties
    Corokalo, D
    Miladinovic, Z
    Zdravkovic, M
    FIRST BALKAN SYMPOSIUM ON VEGETABLES AND POTATOES, VOLS. I & II, 1997, 1 (462): : 829 - 833
  • [25] SNAP BEAN FERTILIZATION STUDIES
    COFFEY, DL
    MULLINS, CA
    HORTSCIENCE, 1976, 11 (03) : 228 - 228
  • [26] Weed control and snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) response to reduced rates of fomesafen
    Bailey, WA
    Wilson, HP
    Hines, TE
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 17 (02) : 269 - 275
  • [27] Effect of Glomus aggregatum on photosynthetic function of snap bean in response to elevated ozone
    Wang, S. G.
    Diao, X. J.
    Li, Y. W.
    Ma, L. M.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2015, 153 (05): : 837 - 852
  • [28] Response of Snap Bean Cultivars to Rhizobium Inoculation under Dryland Agriculture in Ethiopia
    Beshir, Hussien Mohammed
    Walley, Frances L.
    Bueckert, Rosalind
    Tar'an, Bunyamin
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2015, 5 (03): : 291 - 308
  • [29] Response of Palmer Amaranth and Sweetpotato to Flumioxazin/Pyroxasulfone
    Beam, Shawn C.
    Chaudhari, Sushila
    Jennings, Katherine M.
    Monks, David W.
    Meyers, Stephen L.
    Schultheis, Jonathan R.
    Waidschmidt, Mathew
    Main, Effrey L.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 33 (01) : 128 - 134
  • [30] Combining ability for morphoagronomic traits in common bean and snap bean
    Trindade, Roberto dos Santos
    do Amaral Junior, Antonio Teixeira
    Rodrigues, Rosana
    Soriano Viana, Jose Marcelo
    Pereira, Messias Gonzaga
    Azeredo Goncalves, Leandro Simoes
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2011, 6 (29): : 6240 - 6245