Legal Struggles: A Social Theory Perspective on Strategic Litigation and Legal Mobilisation

被引:12
作者
Buckel, Sonja [1 ]
Pichl, Maximilian [1 ]
Vestena, Carolina A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kassel, Kassel, Germany
[2] Univ Duisburg Essen, Duisburg, Germany
关键词
legal mobilisation; strategic litigation; social theory; social movements; lawyers; hegemony; MOVEMENTS; COURTS; LAW; POLITICS; RIGHTS;
D O I
10.1177/09646639231153783
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Social movements, NGOs and other political actors often mobilise the law for social change. Strategic litigation and collective legal mobilisation can be key instruments to face current political challenges like the climate crisis, human rights violations against refugees or the exploitation of workers along global supply chains. Although these struggles are framed by a societal context and have impacts on the political and juridical fields, the literature about legal mobilisation still does not decidedly engage with a social-theory-based perspective on such struggles. By developing the concept of legal struggles, the article proposes a conceptual framework to analyse both the ambivalence and the emancipatory potential of progressive struggles in the juridical field. Critical Theory, Materialist Theory and the Theory of Social Fields by Pierre Bourdieu are combined to investigate the specific form of collective legal struggles carried out in this arena. We examine repertoires and strategies of collective actors as well as the emancipatory potential of these mobilisation strategies. Our conclusions point to the structural distinctions and selectivities which define the juridical field in capitalist societies and also the conditions of possibility of political struggles using the law.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 41
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Differential Use of Litigation by NGOs: A Case Study on Antidiscrimination Legal Mobilization in Belgium
    Lejeune, Aude
    Ringelheim, Julie
    LAW & SOCIAL INQUIRY, 2023, 48 (04) : 1365 - 1398
  • [22] The Puzzle of Social Movements in American Legal Theory
    Cummings, Scott L.
    UCLA LAW REVIEW, 2017, 64 (06) : 1554 - 1660
  • [23] Legal Geography: An Australian Perspective
    Bartel, Robyn
    Graham, Nicole
    Jackson, Sue
    Prior, Jason Hugh
    Robinson, Daniel Francis
    Sherval, Meg
    Williams, Stewart
    GEOGRAPHICAL RESEARCH, 2013, 51 (04) : 339 - 353
  • [24] Prefiguring legal alternatives in environmental and climate justice struggles in Australia
    Clark, Cristy
    Goldblatt, Beth
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 15 (02): : 214 - 236
  • [25] Strategic litigation before the European Committee of Social Rights: Fit for purpose?
    Papadopoulos, Nikolaos A.
    NETHERLANDS QUARTERLY OF HUMAN RIGHTS, 2022, 40 (04) : 379 - 398
  • [26] Mingling and Strategic Augmentation of International Legal Obligations
    Putnam, Tonya L.
    INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2020, 74 (01) : 31 - 64
  • [27] Legal Pluralism in Theory and Practice
    Swenson, Geoffrey
    INTERNATIONAL STUDIES REVIEW, 2018, 20 (03) : 438 - 462
  • [28] Legal Disintegration and a Theory of the State
    Clune, William H.
    REVISTA DE INVESTIGACOES CONSTITUCIONAIS-JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL RESEARCH, 2021, 8 (01): : 107 - 133
  • [29] A Behavioral Theory of Legal Ethics
    Perlman, Andrew M.
    INDIANA LAW JOURNAL, 2015, 90 (04) : 1639 - 1669
  • [30] Understanding the Litigation Priorities of Legal Impact Organizations
    Trowbridge, David L.
    LAW & SOCIAL INQUIRY, 2024, 49 (03) : 1538 - 1571