Deep Learning-Based Image Quality Improvement in Digital Positron Emission Tomography for Breast Cancer

被引:2
作者
Mori, Mio [1 ]
Fujioka, Tomoyuki [1 ]
Hara, Mayumi [1 ]
Katsuta, Leona [1 ]
Yashima, Yuka [1 ]
Yamaga, Emi [1 ]
Yamagiwa, Ken [1 ]
Tsuchiya, Junichi [1 ]
Hayashi, Kumiko [2 ]
Kumaki, Yuichi [2 ]
Oda, Goshi [2 ]
Nakagawa, Tsuyoshi [2 ]
Onishi, Iichiroh [3 ]
Kubota, Kazunori [4 ]
Tateishi, Ukihide [1 ]
机构
[1] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ, Dept Diagnost Radiol, 1-5-45 Yushima,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138510, Japan
[2] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ, Dept Surg, Breast Surg, 1-5-45 Yushima,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138510, Japan
[3] Tokyo Med & Dent Univ, Dept Comprehens Pathol, 1-5-45 Yushima,Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1138510, Japan
[4] Dokkyo Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Saitama Med Ctr, 2-1-50 Minamiko Shigaya, Koshigaya 3438555, Japan
关键词
breast cancer; positron emission tomography; deep learning; image quality improvement; FDG-PET;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics13040794
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
We investigated whether F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography images restored via deep learning (DL) improved image quality and affected axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis diagnosis in patients with breast cancer. Using a five-point scale, two readers compared the image quality of DL-PET and conventional PET (cPET) in 53 consecutive patients from September 2020 to October 2021. Visually analyzed ipsilateral ALNs were rated on a three-point scale. The standard uptake values SUVmax and SUVpeak were calculated for breast cancer regions of interest. For "depiction of primary lesion", reader 2 scored DL-PET significantly higher than cPET. For "noise", "clarity of mammary gland", and "overall image quality", both readers scored DL-PET significantly higher than cPET. The SUVmax and SUVpeak for primary lesions and normal breasts were significantly higher in DL-PET than in cPET (p < 0.001). Considering the ALN metastasis scores 1 and 2 as negative and 3 as positive, the McNemar test revealed no significant difference between cPET and DL-PET scores for either reader (p = 0.250, 0.625). DL-PET improved visual image quality for breast cancer compared with cPET. SUVmax and SUVpeak were significantly higher in DL-PET than in cPET. DL-PET and cPET exhibited comparable diagnostic abilities for ALN metastasis.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Can Contribute to Discriminate Patients with Poor Prognosis in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer
    Ahn, Sung Gwe
    Lee, Minkyung
    Jeon, Tae Joo
    Han, Kyunghwa
    Lee, Hak Min
    Lee, Seung Ah
    Ryu, Young Hoon
    Son, Eun Ju
    Jeong, Joon
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (08):
  • [2] Deep learning-guided estimation of attenuation correction factors from time-of-flight PET emission data
    Arabi, Hossein
    Zaidi, Habib
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2020, 64
  • [3] Early prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response for advanced breast cancer using PET/MRI image deep learning
    Choi, Joon Ho
    Kim, Hyun-Ah
    Kim, Wook
    Lim, Ilhan
    Lee, Inki
    Byun, Byung Hyun
    Noh, Woo Chul
    Seong, Min-Ki
    Lee, Seung-Sook
    Kim, Byung Il
    Choi, Chang Woon
    Lim, Sang Moo
    Woo, Sang-Keun
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [4] FDG-PET for axillary lymph node staging in primary breast cancer
    Crippa, F
    Gerali, A
    Alessi, A
    Agresti, R
    Bombardieri, E
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2004, 31 (Suppl 1) : S97 - S102
  • [5] Deep learning-based attenuation correction in the absence of structural information for whole-body positron emission tomography imaging
    Dong, Xue
    Lei, Yang
    Wang, Tonghe
    Higgins, Kristin
    Liu, Tian
    Curran, Walter J.
    Mao, Hui
    Nye, Jonathon A.
    Yang, Xiaofeng
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 65 (05)
  • [6] Assessment of multifocality and axillary nodal involvement in early-stage breast cancer patients using 18F-FDG PET/CT compared to contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and sentinel node biopsy
    Ergul, Nurhan
    Kadioglu, Huseyin
    Yildiz, Seyma
    Yucel, Serap Baskaya
    Gucin, Zuhal
    Erdogan, Ezgi Basak
    Aydin, Mehmet
    Muslumanoglu, Mahmut
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2015, 56 (08) : 917 - 923
  • [7] The Utility of Deep Learning in Breast Ultrasonic Imaging: A Review
    Fujioka, Tomoyuki
    Mori, Mio
    Kubota, Kazunori
    Oyama, Jun
    Yamaga, Emi
    Yashima, Yuka
    Katsuta, Leona
    Nomura, Kyoko
    Nara, Miyako
    Oda, Goshi
    Nakagawa, Tsuyoshi
    Kitazume, Yoshio
    Tateishi, Ukihide
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2020, 10 (12)
  • [8] American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline Recommendations for Immunohistochemical Testing of Estrogen and Progesterone Receptors in Breast Cancer
    Hammond, M. Elizabeth H.
    Hayes, Daniel F.
    Dowsett, Mitch
    Allred, D. Craig
    Hagerty, Karen L.
    Badve, Sunil
    Fitzgibbons, Patrick L.
    Francis, Glenn
    Goldstein, Neil S.
    Hayes, Malcolm
    Hicks, David G.
    Lester, Susan
    Love, Richard
    Mangu, Pamela B.
    McShane, Lisa
    Miller, Keith
    Osborne, C. Kent
    Paik, Soonmyung
    Perlmutter, Jane
    Rhodes, Anthony
    Sasano, Hironobu
    Schwartz, Jared N.
    Sweep, Fred C. G.
    Taube, Sheila
    Torlakovic, Emina Emilia
    Valenstein, Paul
    Viale, Giuseppe
    Visscher, Daniel
    Wheeler, Thomas
    Williams, R. Bruce
    Wittliff, James L.
    Wolff, Antonio C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (16) : 2784 - 2795
  • [9] Improvement of image quality at CT and MRI using deep learning
    Higaki, Toru
    Nakamura, Yuko
    Tatsugami, Fuminari
    Nakaura, Takeshi
    Awai, Kazuo
    [J]. JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 37 (01) : 73 - 80
  • [10] Comparison of deep learning-based emission-only attenuation correction methods for positron emission tomography
    Hwang, Donghwi
    Kang, Seung Kwan
    Kim, Kyeong Yun
    Choi, Hongyoon
    Lee, Jae Sung
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2022, 49 (06) : 1833 - 1842