Assessing psychosocial costs: Ohio patients? experiences seeking abortion care

被引:7
作者
Odum, Tamika [1 ]
Heymann, Orlaith [2 ]
Turner, Abigail Norris [3 ]
Rivlin, Katherine [4 ]
Bessett, Danielle [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Behav Sci, Blue Ash, OH 45236 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Sociol, Oshkosh, WI USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Dept Internal Med, Columbus, OH USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Columbus, OH USA
[5] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Sociol, Cincinnati, OH USA
关键词
Abortion; Burden; Psychosocial costs; Restrictions; Social harms; COVERAGE; CLINICS; LAW;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2022.08.007
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: Existing research has not thoroughly characterized the psychosocial costs associated with seeking abortion care in restrictive states. Our study seeks to fill this gap by analyzing the accounts of Ohio abortion patients from 2018 to 2019.Study design: Using inductive and deductive approaches, we analyzed semi-structured in-depth qualita-tive interviews with 41 Ohio residents who obtained abortion care from one of three clinics in Ohio or Pennsylvania.Results: Ohioans seeking abortion care often experienced fear of judgment, interpersonal strain, and stress as a result of efforts to overcome pre-Dobbs financial, geographic, and timing challenges. Those who needed financial assistance or traveled more than an hour generally reported greater exposure to psychosocial costs. Conclusions: Participants in this study incurred a complex set of psychosocial costs. Psychosocial costs often resulted from, or were exacerbated by, the financial, geographic, and time-sensitive burdens that patients experienced seeking care. Implications: The psychosocial costs incurred by patients seeking abortion care may be exacerbated in restrictive contexts, especially those who do not have access to insurance coverage for care. Psychoso-cial costs associated with care seeking are likely to increase as states implement more severe restrictions post-Dobbs. To fully understand abortion costs, researchers must examine costs comprehensively, includ-ing both financial and psychosocial costs.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 49
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Women's Experience Obtaining Abortion Care in Texas after Implementation of Restrictive Abortion Laws: A Qualitative Study
    Baum, Sarah E.
    White, Kari
    Hopkins, Kristine
    Potter, Joseph E.
    Grossman, Daniel
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (10):
  • [2] Developing and validating the Psychosocial Burden among people Seeking Abortion Scale (PB-SAS)
    Biggs, M. Antonia
    Neilands, Torsten B.
    Kaller, Shelly
    Wingo, Erin
    Ralph, Lauren J.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (12):
  • [3] How Ohio's proposed abortion bans would impact travel distance to access abortion care
    Chakraborty, Payal
    Murawsky, Stef
    Smith, Mikaela H.
    McGowan, Michelle L.
    Norris, Alison H.
    Bessett, Danielle
    [J]. PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2022, 54 (02) : 54 - 63
  • [4] Charmaz K., 2006, CONSTRUCTING GROUNDE, DOI DOI 10.7748/NR.13.4.84.S4
  • [5] ABORTION PATIENTS' PERCEPTIONS OF ABORTION REGULATION
    Cockrill, Kate
    Weitz, Tracy A.
    [J]. WOMENS HEALTH ISSUES, 2010, 20 (01) : 12 - 19
  • [6] Does Medicaid Coverage Matter? A Qualitative Multi-State Study of Abortion Affordability for Low-income Women
    Dennis, Amanda
    Manski, Ruth
    Blanchard, Kelly
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE FOR THE POOR AND UNDERSERVED, 2014, 25 (04) : 1571 - 1585
  • [7] The undue burden of paying for abortion: An exploration of abortion fund cases
    Ely, Gretchen E.
    Hales, Travis
    Jackson, D. Lynn
    Maguin, Eugene
    Hamilton, Greer
    [J]. SOCIAL WORK IN HEALTH CARE, 2017, 56 (02) : 99 - 114
  • [8] Women's experiences seeking abortion care shortly after the closure of clinics due to a restrictive law in Texas
    Fuentes, Liza
    Lebenkoff, Sharon
    White, Kari
    Gerdts, Caitlin
    Hopkins, Kristine
    Potter, Joseph E.
    Grossman, Daniel
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2016, 93 (04) : 292 - 297
  • [9] Abortion-related worries, fears and preparedness: a Swedish Web-based exploratory and retrospective qualitative study
    Georgsson, Susanne
    Krautmeyer, Stina
    Sundqvist, Emilia
    Carlsson, Tommy
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2019, 24 (05) : 380 - 389
  • [10] Guttmacher Institute, 2022, OV AB LAWS