Measuring "we-ness" in couple relationships: A social identity approach(sic)(sic)(sic)

被引:13
作者
Cruwys, Tegan [1 ]
South, Erica, I [2 ]
Halford, William Kim [2 ]
Murray, Judith A. [2 ]
Fladerer, Martin P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Psychol, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Sch Management, Munich, Germany
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
couple identity; divorce; group membership; relationship quality; relationship satisfaction; separation; we-ness; RELATIONSHIP SATISFACTION; RESPONSES; IDENTIFICATION; RELIABILITY; COMMITMENT; HEALTH; SCALE; INTERDEPENDENCE; INTERVENTION; DEPRESSION;
D O I
10.1111/famp.12811
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Research on couple relationships has increasingly focused on the concept of "we-ness", the subjective closeness of the couple bond, as crucial to predicting relationship outcomes including satisfaction and dissolution. However, diverging perspectives on the definition, terminology, and measurement of this concept persist. We drew upon social identity theorizing to clarify the nature of we-ness and investigate its predictive utility. Participants were 375 members of the general community in long-term intimate relationships. The sample were aged 18-74 (M = 37.22; SD = 12.00) and 69% were women. Participants completed seven measures of we-ness drawn from both the couple literature and the social identity literature. We used exploratory factor analyses to establish the latent structure of we-ness, and regression analyses to examine the utility of each we-ness factor in predicting relationship satisfaction and likelihood of dissolution. A four-factor solution was extracted and the factors were labeled couple identity, partner liking, relationship orientation, and partner similarity. Each of the four factors explained unique variance in relationship quality, with couple identity being most strongly associated with positive outcomes. We conclude that couple research can fruitfully draw upon social identity theorizing in conceptualizing we-ness. This has implications both for more effectively measuring key concepts and for more precisely targeting interventions in couple therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:795 / 817
页数:23
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]   The role of identity in the link between relationship thinking and relationship satisfaction [J].
Acitelli, LK ;
Rogers, S ;
Knee, CR .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 1999, 16 (05) :591-618
[2]   Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships [J].
Agnew, CR ;
Van Lange, PAM ;
Rusbult, CE ;
Langston, CA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 74 (04) :939-954
[3]   The closer 'We' are, the stronger 'I' am: the impact of couple identity on cancer coping self-efficacy [J].
Ahmad, Saunia ;
Fergus, Karen ;
Shatokhina, Kristina ;
Gardner, Sandra .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2017, 40 (03) :403-413
[4]  
Alea N., 2015, COUPLE RESILIENCE, P163, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-9909-6_9
[5]   The social psychology of whistleblowing: An integrated model [J].
Anvari, Farid ;
Wenzel, Michael ;
Woodyatt, Lydia ;
Haslam, S. Alexander .
ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2019, 9 (01) :41-67
[6]   INCLUSION OF OTHER IN THE SELF SCALE AND THE STRUCTURE OF INTERPERSONAL CLOSENESS [J].
ARON, A ;
ARON, EN ;
SMOLLAN, D .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 63 (04) :596-612
[7]  
Badr H, 2020, Wiley Encyclopedia Health Psychol, P81
[8]   Reshaping social structure through performances: Emergent solidarity between actors and observers [J].
Broekman, Aafke van Mourik ;
Gordijn, Ernestine H. ;
Koudenburg, Namkje ;
Postmes, Tom .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 76 :19-32
[9]  
Buehlman K.T., 1992, Journal of Family Psychology, V5, P295, DOI [10.1037/0893-3200.5.3-4.295, DOI 10.1037/0893-3200.5.3-4.295]
[10]   Lie for a Dime: When Most Prescreening Responses Are Honest but Most Study Participants Are Impostors [J].
Chandler, Jesse J. ;
Paolacci, Gabriele .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE, 2017, 8 (05) :500-508