Assessment of screen-recalled abnormalities for digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography screening in the BreastScreen Maroondah trial

被引:6
|
作者
Li, Tong [1 ,2 ]
Lockie, Darren [3 ]
Clemson, Michelle [3 ]
Houssami, Nehmat [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Daffodil Ctr, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Eastern Hlth, Maroondah BreastScreen, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
assessment; breast cancer; digital breast tomosynthesis; mammography; population screening; SYNTHETIC MAMMOGRAPHY; CANCER-DETECTION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1111/1754-9485.13452
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Introduction Australia's first population-based pilot trial comparing digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and digital mammography (DM) screening reported detection measures in 2019. This study describes the trial's secondary outcomes pertaining to the assessment process in women screened with DBT or DM, including the type of recalled abnormalities and the procedures performed. Methods Women with suspected abnormalities at screening were recalled for further investigation. Outcome measures were number of lesions assessed, types of imaging findings recalled to assessment, and data on testing and assessment outcomes; these were reported using descriptive analyses of lesion-specific data. Results A total of 274 lesions and 203 lesions were reported in the DBT-screened and DM-screened groups, respectively. There were a higher proportion of lesions depicted as calcifications (32.4% vs 21.3%), and a lower proportion of lesions depicted as asymmetrical densities (3.2% vs 15.7%) for DBT recalls than DM recalls. A lower proportion of DBT-recalled lesions was assessed with additional mammography than DM-recalled lesions (49.3% vs 93.1%). Higher proportions of DBT-recalled lesions than DM-recalled lesions were investigated with clinical breast examination (50.4% vs 39.9%), core needle biopsy (45.6% vs 28.6%) and open biopsy (4.0% vs 1.0%). Similar proportions of DBT- and DM-recalled lesions were assessed using ultrasound (76.3% vs 71.4%). Conclusion Assessment of screen-recalled lesions showed that, compared with DM, DBT found more benign and more malignant lesions, and generally required more procedures except for less additional mammography workup. These findings show that a transition to DBT screening changes the assessment workload.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 251
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Digital breast tomosynthesis (3D mammography) for breast cancer screening and for assessment of screen-recalled findings: review of the evidence
    Li, Tong
    Marinovich, Michael Luke
    Houssami, Nehmat
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2018, 18 (08) : 785 - 791
  • [2] Effectiveness of hybrid digital breast tomosynthesis/digital mammography compared to digital mammography in women presenting for routine screening at Maroondah BreastScreen: Study protocol for a co-designed, non-randomised prospective trial
    Houssami, Nehmat
    Lockie, Darren
    Giles, Michelle
    Doncovio, Sally
    Marr, Georgina
    Taylor, David
    Li, Tong
    Nickel, Brooke
    Marinovich, M. Luke
    BREAST, 2024, 74
  • [3] Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial
    Skaane, Per
    Bandos, Andriy L.
    Niklason, Loren T.
    Sebuodegard, Sofie
    Osteras, Bjorn H.
    Gullien, Randi
    Gur, David
    Hofvind, Solveig
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 291 (01) : 22 - 29
  • [4] Dense Breast Ultrasound Screening After Digital Mammography Versus After Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Dibble, Elizabeth H.
    Singer, Tisha M.
    Jimoh, Nneka
    Baird, Grayson L.
    Lourenco, Ana P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 213 (06) : 1397 - 1402
  • [5] Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening: The Reggio Emilia Tomosynthesis Randomized Trial
    Pattacini, Pierpaolo
    Nitrosi, Andrea
    Rossi, Paolo Giorgi
    Iotti, Valentina
    Ginocchi, Vladimiro
    Ravaioli, Sara
    Vacondio, Rita
    Braglia, Luca
    Cavuto, Silvio
    Campari, Cinzia
    RADIOLOGY, 2018, 288 (02) : 375 - 385
  • [6] Mammographic features and screening outcome in a randomized controlled trial comparing digital breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography
    Aase, H. S.
    Danielsen, A. S.
    Hoff, S. R.
    Holen, A. S.
    Haldorsen, I. S.
    Hovda, T.
    Hanestad, B.
    Sandvik, C. K.
    Hofvind, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 141
  • [7] Outcomes by Race in Breast Cancer Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography
    Alsheik, Nila
    Blount, Linda
    Qiong, Qiu
    Talley, Melinda
    Pohlman, Scott
    Troeger, Kathleen
    Abbey, Genevieve
    Mango, Victoria L.
    Pollack, Erica
    Chong, Alice
    Donadio, Greg
    Behling, Michael
    Mortimer, Kathleen
    Conant, Emily
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 18 (07) : 906 - 918
  • [8] Interval cancer in the Cordoba Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (CBTST): comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis plus digital mammography to digital mammography alone
    Pulido-Carmona, Cristina
    Romero-Martin, Sara
    Raya-Povedano, Jose Luis
    Cara-Garcia, Maria
    Font-Ugalde, Pilar
    Elias-Cabot, Esperanza
    Pedrosa-Garriguet, Margarita
    Alvarez-Benito, Marina
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2024, 34 (08) : 5427 - 5438
  • [9] Microcalcifications Detected at Screening Mammography: Synthetic Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis versus Digital Mammography
    Lai, Yi-Chen
    Ray, Kimberly M.
    Lee, Amie Y.
    Hayward, Jessica H.
    Freimanis, Rita I.
    Lobach, Iryna V.
    Joe, Bonnie N.
    RADIOLOGY, 2018, 289 (03) : 630 - 638
  • [10] Effect of Mammographic Screening Modality on Breast Density Assessment: Digital Mammography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Gastounioti, Aimilia
    McCarthy, Anne Marie
    Pantalone, Lauren
    Synnestvedt, Marie
    Kontos, Despina
    Conant, Emily F.
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 291 (02) : 319 - 326