Evaluation of the arts in performance-based research funding systems: An international perspective

被引：3

作者：

Lewandowska, Kamila ^{[1
]}

Kulczycki, Emanuel ^{[2
]}

Ochsner, Michael ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Aleksander Zelwerowicz Natl Acad Dramat Art Warsa, Ul Miodowa 22-24, PL-00246 Warsaw, Poland

[2] Adam Mickiewicz Univ, Scholarly Commun Res Grp, Ul Miedzychodzka 5, PL-60371 Poznan, Poland

[3] Univ Lausanne, Swiss Ctr Expertise Social Sci, Geopolis, FORS, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

来源：

RESEARCH EVALUATION | 2023年 / 32卷 / 01期

关键词：

performance-based research funding system; research evaluation; the arts; artistic research; research quality criteria; ACADEMIC RESEARCH; RESEARCH QUALITY; HUMANITIES; CRITERIA;

D O I：

10.1093/reseval/rvac017

中图分类号：

G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];

学科分类号：

1205 ; 120501 ;

摘要：

This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the evaluation of the arts within performance-based research funding systems (PRFSs). Previous literature on PRFSs has overlooked the arts and focussed primarily on outputs in relation to the sciences and humanities. We develop a typology of how artistic outputs are evaluated within 10 countries' PRFSs, operating in Australia, the Czech Republic, Italy, Lithuania, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, and the UK, and identify three different types of artistic evaluation systems. The study compares evaluation methods and provides a classification of quality criteria used by evaluation panels. We conclude with a discussion of the challenges specific to different types of systems.

引用

页码：19 / 31

页数：13

共 70 条

[1] Criteria for assessing quality in academic research: the views of biomedical scientists, clinical scientists and social scientists [J].