Efficacy of oral levonorgestrel emergency contraception with same day etonogestrel contraceptive implant: A prospective observational study

被引:3
|
作者
Gawron, Lori M. [1 ]
Sexsmith, Corinne D. [1 ]
Carter, Gentry [1 ]
Kaiser, Jennifer E. [1 ]
Pangasa, Misha [1 ]
Turok, David K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, ASCENT Ctr Reprod Hlth, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Family Planning Div,Sch Med, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Emergency contraception; Etonogestrel subcutaneous implant; Oral levonorgestrel; Pregnancy; ULIPRISTAL ACETATE; INTRAUTERINE-DEVICES; OVARIAN ACTIVITY; INITIATION; PREGNANCY; TRIAL; WOMEN; PILL; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.contraception.2023.110344
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine a 1-month pregnancy rate point estimate and 95% confidence interval for guideline-supported, same-day initiation of an etonogestrel implant plus oral levonorgestrel emergency contraception. Study design: In this single -arm, prospective observational study, all emergency contraception clients who presented to four Planned Parenthood Association of Utah clinics from February 2021 to March 2023 received information about oral levonorgestrel with same-day etonogestrel implant insertion. Participants were <= 35 years and reported unprotected intercourse within 5 days with negative pregnancy testing. The primary outcome measure was a 1-month home pregnancy test. We calculated the efficacy using a test of proportions with Yates continuity correction. Results: A total of 160 emergency contraception clients (7.6% of 2106 approached) enrolled and 153 had 1-month pregnancy outcomes. A positive pregnancy test occurred in 2 participants resulting in an overall pregnancy rate of 1.32% (95% confidence interval 0.23%-5.19%). Ultrasound gestational dating assigned conception of the first pregnancy to 8 days before enrollment. For the second pregnancy, ultrasound dating designated conception at 5 days prior to enrollment. Limiting the efficacy rate to the single pregnancy that occurred within 5 days of unprotected intercourse, we report a pregnancy rate of 0.66% (95% confidence interval 0.03%-4.19%). Conclusions: In this observational study of emergency contraception clients selecting oral levonorgestrel with same-day etonogestrel implant, we identified a pregnancy rate within the established range of oral emergency contraception methods alone. Implications: Clients presenting for emergency contraception may also desire ongoing highly-effective contraception, yet current clinical guidelines serve as a barrier to same-day method initiation for the etonogestrel implant and other hormonal methods. Improving access to contraceptive method initiation will reduce the ongoing risk of unwanted pregnancy for this population. Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04678817; registered 12/16/20 (c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Preference for and efficacy of oral levonorgestrel for emergency contraception with concomitant placement of a levonorgestrel IUD: a prospective cohort study
    Turok, David K.
    Sanders, Jessica N.
    Thompson, Ivana S.
    Royer, Pamela A.
    Eggebroten, Jennifer
    Gawron, Lori M.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2016, 93 (06) : 526 - 532
  • [2] Contraceptive efficacy of emergency contraception with levonorgestrel given before or after ovulation
    Noe, Gabriela
    Croxatto, Horacio B.
    Maria Salvatierra, Ana
    Reyes, Veronica
    Villarroel, Claudio
    Munoz, Carla
    Morales, Gabriela
    Retamales, Anita
    CONTRACEPTION, 2011, 84 (05) : 486 - 492
  • [3] Emergency contraception with a copper IUD or oral levonorgestrel: an observational study of 1-year pregnancy rates
    Turok, David K.
    Jacobson, Janet C.
    Derrnish, Anna I.
    Simonsen, Sara E.
    Gurtcheff, Shawn
    McFadden, Molly
    Murphy, Patricia A.
    CONTRACEPTION, 2014, 89 (03) : 222 - 228
  • [4] Use of effective contraception 6 months after emergency contraception with a copper intrauterine device or ulipristal acetate - a prospective observational cohort study
    Envall, Niklas
    Kofoed, Nina Groes
    Kopp-Kallner, Helena
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2016, 95 (08) : 887 - 893
  • [5] Contraceptive efficacy of emergency contraception with levonorgestrel given before or after ovulation
    Noe, Gabriela
    Croxatto, Horacio B.
    Maria Salvatierra, Ana
    Reyes, Veronica
    Villarroel, Claudio
    Munoz, Carla
    Morales, Gabriela
    Retamales, Anita
    CONTRACEPTION, 2010, 81 (05) : 414 - 420
  • [6] Administration of the etonogestrel contraceptive implant on the day of mifepristone for medical abortion: a pilot study
    Sonalkar, Sarita
    Hou, Melody
    Borgatta, Lynn
    CONTRACEPTION, 2013, 88 (05) : 671 - 673
  • [7] Ulipristal acetate compared to levonorgestrel emergency contraception among current oral contraceptive users: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Bullard, Kimberley A.
    Edelman, Alison B.
    Williams, Shannon M.
    Rodriguez, Maria, I
    CONTRACEPTION, 2019, 100 (03) : 222 - 227
  • [8] Pregnancy outcome after levonorgestrel-only emergency contraception failure: a prospective cohort study
    Zhang, Lin
    Chen, Junling
    Wang, Yasun
    Ren, Fangming
    Yu, Wen
    Cheng, Linan
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2009, 24 (07) : 1605 - 1611
  • [9] A pilot study of the Copper T380A IUD and oral levonorgestrel for emergency contraception
    Turok, David K.
    Gurtcheff, Shawn E.
    Handley, Erin
    Simonsen, Sara E.
    Sok, Christina
    Murphy, Patricia
    CONTRACEPTION, 2010, 82 (06) : 520 - 525
  • [10] Levonorgestrel used for emergency contraception during lactation-A prospective observational cohort study on maternal and infant safety
    Polakow-Farkash, Sharon
    Gilad, Oded
    Merlob, Paul
    Stahl, Bracha
    Yogev, Yariv
    Klinger, Gil
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2013, 26 (03) : 219 - 221