Which factors influence the use of shared and privately-owned e-scooters in the city of Madrid? Implications for urban mobility

被引:9
作者
Aguilera-Garcia, Alvaro [1 ]
Gomez, Juan [1 ]
Rangel, Thais [1 ,2 ]
Baeza, Maria de los Angeles [3 ]
Vassallo, Jose Manuel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Madrid, Ctr Invest Transporte TRANSyT, Calle Prof Aranguren 3, Madrid 28040, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Madrid, Escuela Tecn Super Ingn & Diseno Ind, Dept Ingn Org Adm Empresas & Estat, Ronda Valencia 3, Madrid 28012, Spain
[3] Univ Granada, Dept Econ Financiera & Contabilidad, Campus Univ Cartuja, Granada 18011, Spain
关键词
E-scooters; E-scooter sharing; Emerging mobility services; Urban mobility; Micromobility; Travel behavior; USAGE PATTERNS; BIKE-SHARE; WASHINGTON; DETERMINANTS; PERCEPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cities.2023.104785
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
Micromobility using fully-electric two-wheeled vehicles is increasing in cities worldwide. E-scooters, whether shared or privately-owned, provide short door-to-door trips by facilitating the first/last mile stage of the journey. They are expected to improve livability in cities by reducing harmful emissions and space occupation. In this respect, understanding travel behavior and usage patterns is essential to regulate them appropriately. The purpose of this study is to determine individuals' sociodemographic variables, mobility-related attributes, and latent constructs influencing e-scooter usage. To that end, an individual-level model is estimated to explain the adoption and frequency of use of both shared and private e-scooters based on survey data. The research takes the city of Madrid as a case study, and contributes to a deeper understanding of the differences in the use of privately-owned and shared e-scooters, with a particular focus on the influence of mobility habits and attitudinal variables. The study is complemented with some insights on shared e-scooter usage at the trip-level, which shows the substitution caused on walking trips, and their limited ability to promote modal shifts from the private car. Finally, the research provides valuable implications for urban dynamics and feedback for policymakers and transport planners.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 89 条
  • [41] INVERS GmbH, 2022, Global moped sharing market report 2022
  • [42] Pedestrians and E-Scooters: An Initial Look at E-Scooter Parking and Perceptions by Riders and Non-Riders
    James, Owain
    Swiderski, J. I.
    Hicks, John
    Teoman, Denis
    Buehler, Ralph
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (20)
  • [43] Eliciting attitudinal factors affecting the continuance use of E-scooters: An empirical study in Chicago
    Javadinasr, Mohammadjavad
    Asgharpour, Sina
    Rahimi, Ehsan
    Choobchian, Pooria
    Mohammadian, Abolfazl Kouros
    Auld, Joshua
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2022, 87 : 87 - 101
  • [44] Understanding the Shared E-scooter Travels in Austin, TX
    Jiao, Junfeng
    Bai, Shunhua
    [J]. ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2020, 9 (02)
  • [45] Long term assessment of a successful e-bike-sharing system. Key drivers and impact on travel behaviour
    Julio, Raky
    Monzon, Andres
    [J]. CASE STUDIES ON TRANSPORT POLICY, 2022, 10 (02) : 1299 - 1313
  • [46] A critical review of new mobility services for urban transport
    Kamargianni, Maria
    Li, Weibo
    Matyas, Melinda
    Schafer, Andreas
    [J]. TRANSPORT RESEARCH ARENA TRA2016, 2016, 14 : 3294 - 3303
  • [47] Investigating the acceptance of shared e-scooters: Empirical evidence from Turkey
    Karli, Rukiye Gizem Oztas
    Karli, Halil
    Celikyay, Hatice Selma
    [J]. CASE STUDIES ON TRANSPORT POLICY, 2022, 10 (02) : 1058 - 1068
  • [48] Characteristics of early shared E-Scooter fatalities in the United States 2018-2020
    Karpinski, Elizabeth
    Bayles, Ellie
    Daigle, Lisa
    Mantine, Dan
    [J]. SAFETY SCIENCE, 2022, 153
  • [49] Kerttu J., 2016, Trivector Rapport 2016, P112
  • [50] Kline R. B., 2016, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE