The impact of high-pressure political reforms on state-owned enterprises: Evidence from China

被引:6
作者
Bae, Sung C. [1 ]
Kwon, Taek Ho [2 ]
Liu, Chenyang [2 ]
机构
[1] Bowling Green State Univ, Schmidthorst Coll Business, Dept Finance, Bowling Green, OH 43403 USA
[2] Chungnam Natl Univ, Sch Business, Daejon, South Korea
关键词
High-pressure political reforms; State-owned enterprises; Anti -corruption campaign; China; AGENCY COSTS; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; ANTI-CORRUPTION; GOVERNMENT; OWNERSHIP; PRIVATIZATION; INVESTMENT; INCENTIVES; CASH; FIRM;
D O I
10.1016/j.irfa.2023.103006
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Taking the case of high-pressure political reforms including the ongoing anti-corruption campaign in China, we investigate the impact of such reforms on the performance of Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) from the agency problem perspective. We report that before the reforms, SOEs significantly underperform non-SOEs in most performance measures, consistent with the existing evidence. Following the reforms, however, the per-formance gaps between SOEs and non-SOEs become insignificant or even reversed. Our results of positive im-pacts of the reforms on overall performance, cost control, operating efficiency and cash positions and their negative impacts on investment levels and efficiency for SOEs are in supportive of our hypotheses based on the agency theory. We further find that the state as SOEs' controlling shareholder is the primary beneficiary of the reforms through higher tax collections from SOEs, though incurring a loss in shareholder stock returns. We also report a few cases of industry heterogeneity in the impacts. Our results lend strong evidence that the political reforms empower the state to deter SOEs' corrupt practices and align their business decisions with the state's political objectives mainly by mitigating agency problems in Chinese SOEs.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] State ownership, political ideology, and firm performance around the world
    Aguilera, Ruth
    Duran, Patricio
    Heugens, P. P. M. A. R.
    Sauerwald, Steve
    Turturea, Roxana
    VanEssen, Marc
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 2021, 56 (01)
  • [2] Law, finance, and economic growth in China
    Allen, F
    Qian, J
    Qian, MJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2005, 77 (01) : 57 - 116
  • [3] Agency costs and ownership structure
    Ang, JS
    Cole, RA
    Lin, JW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2000, 55 (01) : 81 - 106
  • [4] Real effects of climate policy: Financial constraints and spillovers
    Bartram, Sohnke M.
    Hou, Kewei
    Kim, Sehoon
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 143 (02) : 668 - 696
  • [5] Why Do US Firms Hold So Much More Cash than They Used To?
    Bates, Thomas W.
    Kahle, Kathleen M.
    Stulz, Rene M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2009, 64 (05) : 1985 - 2021
  • [6] Baum A., 2020, IMF Working Paper
  • [7] Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States
    Beck, Thorsten
    Levine, Ross
    Levkov, Alexey
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2010, 65 (05) : 1637 - 1667
  • [8] Agency costs and tax planning when the government is a major Shareholder
    Bradshaw, Mark
    Liao, Guanmin
    Ma, Mark
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2019, 67 (2-3) : 255 - 277
  • [9] Political Promotion, CEO Incentives, and the Relationship Between Pay and Performance
    Cao, Xiaping
    Lemmon, Michael
    Pan, Xiaofei
    Qian, Meijun
    Tian, Gary
    [J]. MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2019, 65 (07) : 2947 - 2965
  • [10] Government ownership, corporate governance and tax aggressiveness: evidence from China
    Chan, K. Hung
    Mo, Phyllis L. L.
    Zhou, Amy Y.
    [J]. ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2013, 53 (04) : 1029 - 1051