Volatility impacts on global banks: Insights from the GFC, COVID-19, and the Russia-Ukraine war

被引:34
作者
Batten, Jonathan A. [1 ]
Boubaker, Sabri [2 ,3 ,4 ,7 ]
Kinateder, Harald [5 ]
Choudhury, Tonmoy [6 ]
Wagner, Niklas F. [5 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Royal Melbourne Inst Technol, Sch Econ Finance & Mkt, Melbourne City Campus 124 La Trobe St, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
[2] EM Normandie Business Sch, Metis Lab, Le Havre, France
[3] Vietnam Natl Univ, Int Sch, Hanoi, Vietnam
[4] Swansea Univ, Swansea, Wales
[5] Univ Passau, Sch Business Econ & Informat Syst, Innstr 27, D-94030 Passau, Germany
[6] Australian Catholic Univ, Peter Faber Business Sch, Melbourne, Australia
[7] EM Normandie Business Sch, 20 Quai Frissard, F-76600 Le Havre, France
关键词
Banks; Financial institutions; GSIB; Implied volatility; Pandemics; Value-at-risk; War; FINANCIAL CRISIS; SYSTEMIC RISK; MARKET; CONTAGION; SENTIMENT; RETURN;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2023.09.016
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study analyzes the volatility impact of the Chicago Board Options Exchange Volatility Index (VIX) on the global banking sector during the Global Financial Crisis (GFC), COVID-19, and the Russia-Ukraine War. Using a Dynamic Conditional Correlation (DCC) model with asymmetric Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (GARCH) volatility, we examine three geographical regions, focusing on large banks. The key findings include significant symmetric Granger causality between volatility changes and negative bank returns during the GFC, asymmetric impacts of volatility increases and decreases in the lower quartile of bank returns, with COVID-19 exhibiting the strongest asymmetry, and volatility shocks affecting the downside risk of the banking sector, where the highest value-at-risk (VaR) levels occur in the GFC and the lowest during the war period. Finally, Asian banks demonstrated greater resilience to volatility impacts than European banks, which were the most affected by COVID-19 and the war. Overall, we find that volatility has less impact on the global banking sector in the war sample than in other crises. Our findings provide valuable insights for policymakers, investors, and regulators to help effectively manage future crises and ensure the stability of the global banking sector.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 350
页数:26
相关论文
共 94 条
[41]   Dynamic conditional correlation: A simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models [J].
Engle, R .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2002, 20 (03) :339-350
[42]   Globalisation, economic uncertainty and labour market regulations: Implications for the COVID-19 crisis [J].
Fang, Jianchun ;
Gozgor, Giray ;
Nolt, James H. .
WORLD ECONOMY, 2022, 45 (07) :2165-2187
[43]   Ethos is Destiny: Organizational Values and Compliance in Corporate Governance [J].
Fotaki, Maria ;
Lioukas, Spyros ;
Voudouris, Irini .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2020, 166 (01) :19-37
[44]   Bank systemic risk exposure and office market interconnectedness [J].
Fuss, Roland ;
Ruf, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2021, 133
[45]   Corporate bond default risk: A 150-year perspective [J].
Giesecke, Kay ;
Longstaff, Francis A. ;
Schaefer, Stephen ;
Strebulaev, Ilya .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 102 (02) :233-250
[46]   ON THE RELATION BETWEEN THE EXPECTED VALUE AND THE VOLATILITY OF THE NOMINAL EXCESS RETURN ON STOCKS [J].
GLOSTEN, LR ;
JAGANNATHAN, R ;
RUNKLE, DE .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1993, 48 (05) :1779-1801
[47]  
Goldstein Morris, 2015, From Stress to Growth: Strengthening Asias Financial Systems in a Post-Crisis World
[48]   Creditor rights, bank competition, and corporate investment during the global financial crisis [J].
Gonzalez, Francisco .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2016, 37 :249-270
[49]   THE MACROECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES OF BANK FAILURES UNDER THE NATIONAL BANKING SYSTEM [J].
GROSSMAN, RS .
EXPLORATIONS IN ECONOMIC HISTORY, 1993, 30 (03) :294-320
[50]  
Guenette J.D., 2022, EFI Policy Note 3