The effect of economic growth pressure on green technology innovation: Do environmental regulation, government support, and financial development matter?

被引:149
作者
Yu, Hongyang [1 ]
Wang, Jinchao [1 ,2 ]
Hou, Jian [3 ]
Yu, Bolin [1 ]
Pan, Yuling [4 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Ctr Econ Dev Res, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
[3] Henan Agr Univ, Coll Informat & Management Sci, Zhengzhou 450046, Peoples R China
[4] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Xuzhou 221116, Peoples R China
关键词
Economic growth pressure; Green technology innovation; Moderating effect; Government support; Environmental regulation; Financial development; FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION; PERSPECTIVE; EFFICIENCY; CHINA; COMPETITIVENESS; SUBSIDIES; LAW;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117172
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Green technology improvement is critical in promoting green development and mitigating negative externalities. Exploring the effect of economic growth pressure (EGP) on green technology innovation (GTI) is important for coordinated economic growth and green transformation. Using the data from 285 cities in China during 2006-2018, this study investigates the influence of EGP on GTI by taking the difference between economic growth target and previous year's actual growth rate to represent the EGP. The results indicate that EGP negatively affects GTI. When there is a 1% increase in EGP, green patent applications will fall by 3.2%. Furthermore, the heterogeneity analysis indicates that the negative effect of EGP is especially significant in western China compared with eastern and central regions. In addition, we find various nonlinear moderating effects between EGP and GTI by using panel threshold model. Specifically, EGP and GTI show an inverted U-shaped relationship with EGP increasing. Meanwhile, only when environmental regulation, government support, and financial development cross the thresholds will EGP have a significant role in promoting GTI. This study provides helpful implications for decision-makers to adopt a more reasonable combination of policy tools to achieve economic growth targets and low-carbon transformation.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   The Environment and Directed Technical Change [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Aghion, Philippe ;
Bursztyn, Leonardo ;
Hemous, David .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (01) :131-166
[2]   A MODEL OF GROWTH THROUGH CREATIVE DESTRUCTION [J].
AGHION, P ;
HOWITT, P .
ECONOMETRICA, 1992, 60 (02) :323-351
[3]   Do credit constraints favor dirty production? Theory and plant-level evidence [J].
Andersen, Dana C. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 84 :189-208
[4]   Knowledge sources and impacts on subsequent inventions: Do green technologies differ from non-green ones? [J].
Barbieri, Nicole ;
Marzucchi, Alberto ;
Rizzo, Ugo .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2020, 49 (02)
[5]   Partial fiscal decentralization and demand responsiveness of the local public sector: Theory and evidence from Norway [J].
Borge, Lars-Erik ;
Brueckner, Jan K. ;
Rattso, Jorn .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2014, 80 :153-163
[6]   Linking emission trading to environmental innovation: Evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry [J].
Borghesi, Simone ;
Cainelli, Giulio ;
Mazzanti, Massimiliano .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2015, 44 (03) :669-683
[7]   Can direct environmental regulation promote green technology innovation in heavily polluting industries? Evidence from Chinese listed companies [J].
Cai, Xiang ;
Zhu, Bangzhu ;
Zhang, Haijing ;
Li, Liang ;
Xie, Meiying .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 746
[8]  
Cameron G., 1996, INNOVATION EC GROWTH
[9]   Do constraints created by economic growth targets benefit sustainable development? Evidence from China [J].
Chai, Jingxia ;
Hao, Yu ;
Wu, Haitao ;
Yang, Yuemiao .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 30 (08) :4188-4205
[10]   Haste doesn't bring success: Top-down amplification of economic growth targets and enterprise overcapacity [J].
Chen, Jiachun ;
Chen, Xia ;
Hou, Qingsong ;
Hu, May .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2021, 70