Multiple technologies, multiple sources: trends and analyses of the literature on technology-mediated feedback for L2 English writing published from 2015-2019

被引:39
作者
Loncar, Michael [1 ,2 ]
Schams, Wayne [1 ]
Liang, Jong-Shing [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Pingtung Univ, Dept English, Pingtung, Taiwan
[2] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Foreign Languages & Literature, Tainan, Taiwan
关键词
L2; writing; technology-mediated feedback; computer-mediated feedback; peer review; teaching; learning strategies; WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK; COMPUTER-GENERATED FEEDBACK; THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES; GRAMMATICAL ACCURACY; FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT; ELECTRONIC FEEDBACK; ERROR-CORRECTION; USER ACCEPTANCE; PEER FEEDBACK; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1080/09588221.2021.1943452
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The following review incorporates a systematic selection, coding, and analysis methodology in order to compile a corpus of empirical research studies that investigate the use of technology-mediated feedback in L2 writing contexts published from 2015-2019. Trends are identified by coding and quantitatively analyzing key parameters of the corpus, and the corpus is qualitatively analyzed, contextualizing and exploring emergent themes within these trends in rich detail. Key quantitative findings reveal (A) the leading journals are Computer Assisted Language Learning, Computers & Education, Journal of Second Language Writing, and Language Learning & Technology; (B) the region with the most publications is Greater Asia, with the USA as the country with the most publications; (C) the majority of studies were conducted in EFL contexts; (D) tertiary contexts dominate, with the majority occurring at the undergraduate level in blended learning contexts; (E) the majority of studies examined feedback that contained both local and global feedback; (F) the majority of studies gave comprehensive feedback via a mix of direct and indirect feedback, were delivered within formative treatments, and used either asynchronous or mixtures of both asynchronous and synchronous modes; (G) as for types of technology used, multiple technologies were used most, followed by individual study tools, cloud-based word processors and shared documents, and network-based social computing; (H) most research orientations were descriptive or comparative and used non-experimental designs; and (I) the most popular sources of feedback were issued from teachers, AWEs, and peers. Eight studies investigated the use of feedback stemming from multiple sources. Finally, qualitative analyses explore emergent themes involving the intersection of source of feedback and technology type; in doing so, the authors describe, contextualize, and critique in rich detail how the use of artful combinations of technologies and sources are currently shaping the use of technology-mediated feedback in L2 writing instruction and research.
引用
收藏
页码:722 / 784
页数:63
相关论文
共 139 条
[1]   Synthesizing the Practice of SCMC-based Telecollaboration: A Scoping Review [J].
Akiyama, Yuka ;
Cunningham, D. Joseph .
CALICO JOURNAL, 2018, 35 (01) :49-76
[2]  
Al-Samarraie H, 2019, INT REV RES OPEN DIS, V20, P121
[3]  
Ali A.D., 2016, English Language Teaching, V9, P106, DOI [10.5539/elt.v9n8p106, DOI 10.5539/ELT.V9N8P106]
[4]   Using an online collaborative project between American and Chinese students to develop ESL teaching skills, cross-cultural awareness and language skills [J].
Angelova, Maria ;
Zhao, Ying .
COMPUTER ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2016, 29 (01) :167-185
[5]   Synthesizing Research on Learner Perceptions of CMC Use in EFL/ESL Writing [J].
Aslan, Erhan ;
Ciftci, Hatime .
CALICO JOURNAL, 2019, 36 (02) :100-118
[6]   Intercultural communicative competence and online exchanges: a systematic review [J].
Avgousti, Maria Iosifina .
COMPUTER ASSISTED LANGUAGE LEARNING, 2018, 31 (08) :819-853
[7]  
Biber D., 2011, ETS RES REPORT SERIE, V2011, pi, DOI [10.1002/j.2333-8504.2011.tb02241.x, DOI 10.1002/J.2333-8504.2011.TB02241.X]
[8]  
Bitchener J., 2012, WRITTEN CORRECTIVE F
[9]   Evidence in support of written corrective feedback [J].
Bitchener, John .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2008, 17 (02) :102-118
[10]   Written corrective feedback studies: Approximate replication of Bitchener & Knoch (2010a) and Van Beuningen, De Jong & Kuiken (2012) [J].
Bitchener, John ;
Knoch, Ute .
LANGUAGE TEACHING, 2015, 48 (03) :405-414