Facilitating and automating usability testing of educational technologies

被引:1
作者
Villamane, Mikel [1 ]
Alvarez, Ainhoa [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basque Country, UPV EHU, Languages & Comp Syst, Bilbao, Spain
[2] Univ Basque Country, UPV EHU, Languages & Comp Syst, Donostia San Sebastian, Spain
[3] Univ Basque Country, UPV EHU, Languages & Comp Syst, Manuel Lardizabal Pasealekua 1, Donostia San Sebastian 20018, Gipuzkoa, Spain
关键词
educational technologies; usability testing;
D O I
10.1002/cae.22725
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Usability evaluation is a key element to ensure a positive user experience with any software and it is especially important in educational software tools where there are many different actors involved (lecturers, students, administrators, etc.). However, evaluating usability is not an easy task for nonexpert evaluators. To facilitate this evaluation task, this article presents a Methodology for Usability Testing (MUT) and a system (CALMUT) that assists nonexpert evaluators in the application of the methodology by automatizing the calculations and facilitating their interpretation. This can be very useful for learning and instructional designers but also to people involved in the decision of introducing or not a new educational software. To develop the proposal, a literature review of different usability metrics, methods, and systems was carried out first, followed by a selection and adaptation for novice usability evaluators. This article also presents a case study where lecturers tested the usability of an educational software following the proposal and shows that using MUT and CALMUT helps people without previous experience detect the main usability problems of educational systems before deciding whether to use them or not.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Albert William, 2013, Measuring the user experience: Collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics
  • [2] American Educational Research Association American Psychological Association National Council on Measurement in Education, 2014, Standards for educational and psychological testing, DOI DOI 10.1037/14855-004
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2018, Ergonomics of human-system interaction-Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts (BS EN ISO 9241-11:2018)
  • [4] Bleecker ID, 2018, Remote usability testing: Actionable insights in user behavior across geographies and time zones
  • [5] Brooke J, 2013, J USABILITY STUD, V8, P29
  • [6] New approaches to usability evaluation in software development: Barefoot and crowdsourcing
    Bruun, Anders
    Stage, Jan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2015, 105 : 40 - 53
  • [7] Towards the Detection of UX Smells: The Support of Visualizations
    Buono, Paolo
    Caivano, Danilo
    Costabile, Maria Francesca
    Desolda, Giuseppe
    Lanzilotti, Rosa
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 6901 - 6914
  • [8] Systematic guidance on usability methods in user-centered software development
    Cayola, Luis
    Macias, Jose A.
    [J]. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 97 : 163 - 175
  • [9] Spanish Version of the System Usability Scale for the Assessment of Electronic Tools: Development and Validation
    Del Rocio Sevilla-Gonzalez, Magdalena
    Loaeza, Lizbeth Moreno
    Sofia Lazaro-Carrera, Laura
    Bourguet Ramirez, Brigette
    Vazquez Rodriguez, Anabel
    Luisa Peralta-Pedrero, Maria
    Almeda-Valdes, Paloma
    [J]. JMIR HUMAN FACTORS, 2020, 7 (04):
  • [10] Dimitrijevic S., 2020, USABILITY EVALUATION