Forestry offsets under China's certificated emission reduction (CCER) for carbon neutrality: regulatory gaps and the ways forward

被引:7
作者
Xu, Shengqing [1 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Ocean Univ, Dept Humanities & Law, Lianyungang, Peoples R China
关键词
Forestry offsets; Carbon emission trade; Certified emission reduction; Carbon sink right; SEQUESTRATION; REDD; LESSONS; TRANSACTION; PROTOCOLS; ECONOMICS; PAYMENTS; PROJECTS; IMPACTS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1108/IJCCSM-04-2022-0047
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
PurposeAs a typical nature-based solution to climate change, forestry carbon sinks are vital to achieving carbon neutrality in China. However, regulations in China are insufficient to promote the development of carbon offset projects in forestry. This study aims to identify the regulatory obstacles impeding the development of forestry offsets under China's certified emission reduction (CCER) and explore ways to improve the regulatory system.Design/methodology/approachThis study conducts a qualitative analysis using a normative legal research method. This study conducted a synthetic review of national and local regulatory documents to gain insights into the regulatory landscape of forestry offsets in China. The main contents and characteristics of these documents are illustrated. Furthermore, related secondary literature was reviewed to gain further insight into forestry offset regulations and to identify significant gaps in China's CCER regulation.FindingsForestry offset regulations under the CCER are characterized by fragmentation and a relatively lower legally binding force. There is no systematic institutional arrangement for forestry offset development, impeding market expectations and increasing transaction costs. The main challenges in China's regulation of forestry carbon sinks include entitlement ambiguity, complicated rules for registration and verification, a lack of mechanisms for incentives, risk prevention and biodiversity protection.Originality/valueForestry carbon sinks' multiple environmental and social values necessitate their effective development and utilization. This study assessed forestry offset regulations in China and proposed corresponding institutional arrangements to improve forestry carbon sink regulations under the CCER.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 156
页数:17
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
Abigail S., 2012, HASTINGS ENV LAW J, V18, P293
[2]  
Adnan M.A., 2020, LEGAL BRIEF, V10, P50
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Summary for Policymakers: Synthesis Report., Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I
[4]  
Arendt R., 2021, PROGR LIFE CYCLE ASS
[5]   Lessons from Regulating Carbon Offset Markets [J].
Arup, Christopher ;
Zhang, Hao .
TRANSNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW, 2015, 4 (01) :69-100
[6]   The global tree restoration potential [J].
Bastin, Jean-Francois ;
Finegold, Yelena ;
Garcia, Claude ;
Mollicone, Danilo ;
Rezende, Marcelo ;
Routh, Devin ;
Zohner, Constantin M. ;
Crowther, Thomas W. .
SCIENCE, 2019, 365 (6448) :76-+
[7]   Power, REDD plus and reforming forest governance in Indonesia [J].
Boer, Henry J. .
THIRD WORLD QUARTERLY, 2020, 41 (05) :783-800
[8]  
Boyd PW, 2023, NATURE, V620, P947, DOI 10.1038/d41586-023-02649-8
[9]  
Boyd R., 2022, WHY FOREST CARBON OF
[10]   Assessing crediting scheme standards and practices for ensuring unit quality under the Paris agreement [J].
Broekhoff, Derik ;
Spalding-Fecher, Randall .
CARBON MANAGEMENT, 2021, 12 (06) :635-648