Social entrepreneurs concerned about Impact Drift. Evidence from contexts of persistent and pervasive need

被引:10
作者
Argiolas, Alessia [1 ]
Rawhouser, Hans [2 ]
Sydow, Alisa [3 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV USA
[3] ESCP Business Sch, Turin, Italy
关键词
Social impact; Mission drift; Stakeholder expectations; Behavioral theory; Africa; COMMERCIAL MICROFINANCE; HYBRID ORGANIZATIONS; REFERENCE POINTS; MISSION DRIFT; PERSPECTIVE; BUSINESS; IDENTITY; ENTERPRISES; POVERTY; MARKETS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusvent.2023.106342
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In the Global North, where social entrepreneurs and their stakeholders agree that social enterprise needs to do more for stakeholders than traditional business, social entrepreneurs balancing financial and pro-social goals seek to avoid mission drift by being responsive to their stakeholders. In many areas of the Global South, despite the work of NGOs and foreign aid, social problems remain persistent and pervasive, so social entrepreneurs face vastly different stakeholder demands. Our qualitative study of 36 social entrepreneurs in Kenya, Uganda, and Rwanda builds on behavioral theory to understand how social entrepreneurs balance pro-social and financial goals in this context. We find that they experience a mismatch between their social impact aspirations and the expectations of stakeholders, which leads to concerns of Impact Drift, which we define as the decoupling of pro-social actions from enduring social impact outcomes. Concerns of impact drift prompt a norm-breaking approach to social impact, involving orchestrating novel coalitions of stakeholders and employing heuristics to limit their focus and reassure them about their approach.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 123 条
[1]   Reference points for measuring social performance: Case study of a social business venture [J].
Andre, Kevin ;
Cho, Charles H. ;
Laine, Matias .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2018, 33 (05) :660-678
[2]   From Caring Entrepreneur to Caring Enterprise: Addressing the Ethical Challenges of Scaling up Social Enterprises [J].
Andre, Kevin ;
Pache, Anne-Claire .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2016, 133 (04) :659-675
[3]   An institutional perspective on the social outcome of entrepreneurship: Commercial microfinance and inclusive markets [J].
Ault, Joshua K. .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2016, 47 (08) :951-967
[4]   Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems [J].
Autio, Erkko ;
Nambisan, Satish ;
Thomas, Llewellyn D. W. ;
Wright, Mike .
STRATEGIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP JOURNAL, 2018, 12 (01) :72-95
[5]   Feeling capable and valued: A prosocial perspective on the link between empathy and social entrepreneurial intentions [J].
Bacq, Sophie ;
Alt, Elisa .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2018, 33 (03) :333-350
[6]   Business sustainability: It is about time [J].
Bansal, Pratima ;
DesJardine, Mark .
STRATEGIC ORGANIZATION, 2014, 12 (01) :70-78
[7]   Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility [J].
Barnett, Michael L. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (03) :794-816
[8]   Advancing Research on Hybrid Organizing - Insights from the Study of Social Enterprises [J].
Battilana, Julie ;
Lee, Matthew .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2014, 8 (01) :397-441
[9]  
Battilana J, 2018, MANAGEMENT-FRANCE, V21, P1278
[10]   BEYOND SHAREHOLDER VALUE MAXIMIZATION: ACCOUNTING FOR FINANCIAL/SOCIAL TRADE-OFFS IN DUAL-PURPOSE COMPANIES [J].
Battilana, Julie ;
Obloj, Tomasz ;
Pache, Anne-Claire ;
Sengul, Metin .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2022, 47 (02) :237-258