A Double Remote Magnetic Field Synthesis Method for Reducing High-Speed MFL Signal Distortion Caused by Velocity Effect

被引:25
作者
Feng, Jian [1 ]
Xiao, Qi [1 ]
Lu, Senxiang [1 ]
Zhang, Huaguang [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Coll Informat Sci & Engn, Shenyang 110819, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Detectors; Magnetostatics; Inspection; Testing; Magnetization; Pipelines; Magnetic flux leakage; Double remote magnetic field synthesis (DRMFS); pipe magnetization; signal distortion reduction; velocity effect; 3D SIMULATION; DETECTOR;
D O I
10.1109/TIE.2023.3239857
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Magnetic flux leakage (MFL) testing is coming into prominence as an inspection tool applied to pipeline evaluation. The MFL detectors are challenging to accurately evaluate pipe defects at high speed due to velocity effects. Current methods typically require detectors to operate at low speeds or compensate for detection data offline, but they reduce detection efficiency or require sophisticated algorithms. In this article, a novel double remote magnetic field synthesis (DRMFS) method is proposed to address the issue. First, we give a thorough analysis of the influence of velocity effects on high-speed MFL signals, reinterpreting its action mechanism. Second, the critical parameters are optimized to improve pipe magnetization. The relationships between the sensor layout and normalized signal similarity are studied at different speeds to reduce signal distortion. Finally, the usability of the DRMFS method in reducing signal distortion and its capability in detecting deep defects are validated by measuring defect depths. Results showed synthesis signals are highly similar to static MFL signals and approximately linear with the defect depth, which could improve the detection accuracy. Our results can enable the exploration of information utilization in limited space and the establishment of a balance between detection efficiency and signal accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:1049 / 1059
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   3D simulation and experiment on high speed rail MFL inspection [J].
Antipov, A. G. ;
Markov, A. A. .
NDT & E INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 98 :177-185
[2]   A comparative analysis of the active and residual magnetization methods in the nondestructive testing of rails [J].
Antipov, A. G. ;
Markov, A. A. .
RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING, 2016, 52 (03) :155-160
[3]   Lorentz force eddy current testing: a novel NDE-technique [J].
Brauer, Hartmut ;
Porzig, Konstantin ;
Mengelkamp, Judith ;
Carlstedt, Matthias ;
Ziolkowski, Marek ;
Toepfer, Hannes .
COMPEL-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR COMPUTATION AND MATHEMATICS IN ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING, 2014, 33 (06) :1965-1977
[4]   Application of Lorentz force eddy current testing and eddy current testing on moving nonmagnetic conductors [J].
Carlstedt, Matthias ;
Porzig, Konstantin ;
Uhlig, Robert P. ;
Zec, Mladen ;
Ziolkowski, Marek ;
Brauer, Hartmut .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED ELECTROMAGNETICS AND MECHANICS, 2014, 45 (1-4) :519-526
[5]   Rail crack recognition based on Adaptive Weighting Multi-classifier Fusion Decision [J].
Chen, Wangcai ;
Liu, Wenbo ;
Li, Kaiyu ;
Wang, Ping ;
Zhu, Haixia ;
Zhang, Yanyan ;
Hang, Cheng .
MEASUREMENT, 2018, 123 :102-114
[6]  
Cullity B.D., 2009, Introduction to Magnetic Materials
[7]   Speed Control of Pipeline Inner Detector Based on Interval Dynamic Matrix Control With Additional Margin [J].
Feng, Jian ;
Liu, Jinze ;
Zhang, Huaguang .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2021, 68 (12) :12657-12667
[8]   A Sensor Liftoff Modification Method of Magnetic Flux Leakage Signal for Defect Profile Estimation [J].
Feng, Jian ;
Lu, Senxiang ;
Liu, Jinhai ;
Li, Fangming .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2017, 53 (07)
[9]  
Jackson JohnDavid., 2007, CLASSICAL ELECTRODYN
[10]   Alternative magnetic flux leakage modalities for pipeline inspection [J].
Katragadda, G ;
Lord, W ;
Sun, YS ;
Udpa, S ;
Udpa, L .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 1996, 32 (03) :1581-1584