Influence of random telegraph noise on quantum bit gate operation

被引:0
|
作者
Likens, Jackson [1 ]
Prabhakar, Sanjay [1 ]
Lal, Ratan [2 ]
Melnik, Roderick [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Northwest Missouri State Univ, Hubbard Ctr Innovat, Loess Hill Res Ctr, Dept Nat Sci, 800 Univ Dr, Maryville, MO 64468 USA
[2] Northwest Missouri State Univ, Dept Comp Sci, 800 Univ Dr, Maryville, MO 64468 USA
[3] Wilfrid Laurier Univ, Interdisciplinary Res Inst MS2Discovery, Lab M3AI, 75 Univ Ave, Waterloo, ON N3L 3V6, Canada
[4] BCAM, Bizkaia Technol Pk, Derio 48160, Spain
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
DOTS;
D O I
10.1063/5.0147810
中图分类号
O59 [应用物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
We consider the problem of analyzing spin-flip qubit gate operation in the presence of Random Telegraph Noise (RTN). Our compressive approach is the following. By using the Feynman disentangling operators method, we calculate the spin-flip probability of qubit driven by different kinds of composite pulses, e.g., Constant pulse (C-pulse), Quantum Well pulse (QW-pulse), and Barrier Potential pulse (BP-pulse) in the presence of RTN. When composite pulses and RTN act in the x-direction and z-direction respectively, we calculate the optimal time to achieve perfect spin-flip probability of qubit. We report that the highest fidelity of spin-flip qubit can be achieved by using C-pulse, followed by BP-pulse and QW-pulse. For a more general case, we have tested several pulse sequences for achieving high fidelity quantum gates, where we use the pulses acting in different directions. From the calculations, we find that high fidelity of qubit gate operation in the presence of RTN is achieved when QW-pulse, BP-pulse, and C-pulse act in the x-direction, y-direction, and z-direction, respectively. We extend our investigations for multiple QW and BP pulses while choosing the C-pulse amplitude constant in the presence of RTN. The results of calculation show that 98.5 % fidelity can be achieved throughout the course of RTN that may be beneficial for quantum error correction.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gate Delay Variability due to Random Telegraph Noise
    Barbosa, Rodolfo G.
    Both, Thiago H.
    Wirth, Gilson
    35TH SYMPOSIUM ON MICROELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY AND DEVICES (SBMICRO2021), 2021,
  • [2] Gate current random telegraph noise and single defect conduction
    Kaczer, B.
    Toledano-Luque, M.
    Goes, W.
    Grasser, T.
    Groeseneken, G.
    MICROELECTRONIC ENGINEERING, 2013, 109 : 123 - 125
  • [3] Dynamical decoupling of random telegraph noise in a two-qubit gate
    D'Arrigo, A.
    Falci, G.
    Paladino, E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUANTUM INFORMATION, 2014, 12 (02)
  • [4] Statistical Analysis and Modeling of Random Telegraph Noise Based on Gate Delay Measurement
    Islam, A. K. M. Mahfuzul
    Nakai, Tatsuya
    Onodera, Hidetoshi
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING, 2017, 30 (03) : 216 - 226
  • [5] Random telegraph noise modulation by switching bias in floating gate memory devices
    Fantini, Paolo
    Calderoni, Alessandro
    Marinoni, Andrea
    NOISE AND FLUCTUATIONS, 2007, 922 : 119 - +
  • [6] Random telegraph noise in microstructures
    Kogan, S
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1998, 81 (14) : 2986 - 2989
  • [7] Random telegraph noise in microstructures
    Phys Rev Lett, 14 (2986):
  • [8] Macroscopic Random Telegraph Noise
    Jung, Grzegorz
    FLUCTUATION AND NOISE LETTERS, 2019, 18 (02):
  • [9] Quantum dephasing induced by non-Markovian random telegraph noise
    Xiangji Cai
    Scientific Reports, 10
  • [10] Random telegraph signals and 1/f noise in a silicon quantum dot
    Peters, MG
    Dijkhuis, JI
    Molenkamp, LW
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 1999, 86 (03) : 1523 - 1526