Distance education as a tool to improve researchers' knowledge on predatory journals in countries with limited resources: the Moroccan experience

被引:11
作者
El Bairi, Khalid [1 ]
Fourtassi, Maryam [2 ]
El Fatimy, Rachid [3 ]
El Kadmiri, Nadia [4 ]
机构
[1] Mohammed Ist Univ, Fac Med & Pharm, Oujda, Morocco
[2] Abdelmalek Essaadi Univ, Fac Med & Pharm Tangier, Lab Life & Hlth Sci, Tetouan, Morocco
[3] Mohammed VI Polytech Univ, Inst Biol Sci ISSB, Fac Med Sci UM6P, Ben Guerir, Morocco
[4] IBN ZOHR Univ, Polydisciplinary Fac Taroudant, Geobioenvironm Engn & Innovat Lab, Mol Engn Biotechnol & Innovat Team, Taroudannt City, Morocco
关键词
Webinars; Distance education; Predatory journals; Survey; Morocco; OPEN ACCESS; METRICS; INTEGRITY; SCIENCE; PUBLISH;
D O I
10.1007/s40979-023-00122-7
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The emergence of predatory journals is a global threat for scientific integrity, particularly in under-resourced settings such as low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). A bilingual course on predatory publishing using a distance education approach was developed for Moroccan researchers as a response to the imperative need for training on research ethics to implement good scientific practices. A cross-sectional survey-based study was conducted to evaluate outcomes after delivering two education sessions in both French and English. Before this course, 40% of participants indicated that they don't verify journal quality before manuscript submission and most of them consider Scopus indexing and the impact factor as the best criteria for journal publication. Approximately 50% of surveyees did not have previous information on predatory journals before the webinar. Pressure to publish by supervisors, institutions of affiliation, or funding agencies, was noticed in 43.4% of participants. After the webinar course was delivered, remarkably, the proportion of participants with knowledge on predatory publishing was meaningfully increased from 48.9% to 81%. Importantly, 83.7% of participants indicated that they are motivated to share their new knowledge on predatory publishing with their colleagues. Moreover, the majority of respondents (73.8%) reported that publishing their research in predatory journals may damage their career and professional future. Promisingly, nearly a half or more of participants recommended the use of training based on distance education, surveillance of researchers by their mentors and affiliations, and social networks to increase awareness on predatory publishing. Almost all participants were satisfied with the content of the webinar. Trainers and research institutions in LMICs should benefit from the advent of distance education using webinar platforms to increase awareness on the issue of predatory publishing in their settings.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Al-Adawi Samir, 2016, Oman Med J, V31, P5, DOI 10.5001/omj.2016.02
  • [2] Questioning the Impact of the Impact Factor. A Brief Review and Future Directions
    Ali, Mohammad Javed
    [J]. SEMINARS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 37 (01) : 91 - 96
  • [3] Can citation metrics predict the true impact of scientific papers?
    Aroeira, Rita I.
    Castanho, Miguel A. R. B.
    [J]. FEBS JOURNAL, 2020, 287 (12) : 2440 - 2448
  • [4] An Education Session Developed in Response to Low Health Professional Awareness of Predatory Journals
    Babb, Maureen
    Dingwall, Orvie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE CANADIAN HEALTH LIBRARIES ASSOCIATION, 2019, 40 (03): : 99 - 110
  • [5] PUBLISH OR PERISH
    BARRETT, NR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1962, 44 (02) : 167 - &
  • [6] Who's Afraid of Peer Review?
    Bohannon, John
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2013, 342 (6154) : 60 - 65
  • [7] Using webinars to support your continuing professional development
    Bryson, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISUAL COMMUNICATION IN MEDICINE, 2020, 43 (04) : 222 - 224
  • [8] Predatory Invitations from Journals: More Than Just a Nuisance?
    Clemons, Mark
    de Costa e Silva, Miguel
    Joy, Anil Abraham
    Cobey, Kelly D.
    Mazzarello, Sasha
    Stober, Carol
    Hutton, Brian
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2017, 22 (02) : 236 - 240
  • [9] Knowledge and motivations of researchers publishing in presumed predatory journals: a survey
    Cobey, Kelly D.
    Grudniewicz, Agnes
    Lalu, Manoj M.
    Rice, Danielle B.
    Raffoul, Hana
    Moher, David
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (03):
  • [10] Cortegiani Andrea, 2020, F1000Res, V9, P415, DOI 10.12688/f1000research.23847.1