Personalized Treatment Strategy in "Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Candidates" Using Irreversible Electroporation: Prospective Evaluation of Feasibility, Morbidity, Functional and Oncological Outcomes

被引:2
作者
Popeneciu, Ionel Valentin [1 ,2 ]
Mohr, Mirjam Naomi [1 ]
Strauss, Arne [1 ]
Leitsmann, Conrad [1 ]
Trojan, Lutz [1 ]
Reichert, Mathias [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Goettingen, Dept Urol, Robert Koch Str 40, D-37075 Gottigen, Germany
[2] Paracelsus Med Univ Nuremberg, Dept Urol, Nurnberg, Germany
关键词
Irreversible electroporation therapy; Prostatic neoplasms; Treatment outcome; Watchful waiting; FOCAL THERAPY; ABLATION; SAFETY;
D O I
10.5534/wjmh.230097
中图分类号
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the morbidity, functional and oncological outcome of irreversible electroporation (IRE) as a focal therapy for prostate cancer (PCa) when used in "active surveillance (AS)" candidates refusing standard treatment options. Materials and Methods: IRE was performed under general anaesthesia, and the transurethral catheter was removed one day after intervention in all patients. Pre-and post-interventional voiding parameters (measured by International Prostate Symptom Score Questionnaire [IPSS], uroflowmetry and post-void residue) were compared. Follow-up (FU) was observed over a minimum of six months, including oncological outcome (controlled by multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, rebiopsy, prostate-specific antigen dynamic as well as the need and type of secondary treatment) and general functional outcome (International Index of Erectile Function Questionnaire, satisfaction of the procedure). Results: Twenty-four patients refusing AS or standard treatment with a median FU of 18.7 months were included. IPSS showed nine patients with mild, 12 with moderate and two with severe obstructive voiding symptoms pre-intervention (focal IRE). Median IPSS pre-IRE was 9 points, 8.5 (p=0.341) at six months and 10 (p=0.392) after 12 months, respectively. Pre-IRE maximum urinary flow (Qmax) (median: 16.1 +/- 8.0 mL/sec) and Qmax after catheter removal (16.2 +/- 7.6 mL/sec) did not differ significantly (p=0.904). Thirteen PCa recurrences occurred (54.2%). Out-of-lesion-PCa was found in 12/13 patients (92.3%), while 4/13 patients showed in-lesion-PCa recurrence simultaneously (30.8%). In one patient, there was an in-lesion-PCa recurrence only (7.7%). Six out of 24 patients (25.0%) received a secondary treatment. All patients were satisfied with the IRE procedure. Conclusions: Focal IRE underperforms regarding the overall oncological outcome and should not be offered as an equivalent therapy to established curative treatment strategies. Nevertheless, under a strict FU regimen, its lack of significant additional morbidity compared to an active surveillance strategy makes IRE a feasible alternative for low-risk PCa in highly selected patients as a personalised approach.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [11] Irreversible Electroporation for Prostate Cancer
    Ong, Sean
    Leonardo, Matthew
    Chengodu, Thilakavathi
    Bagguley, Dominic
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    [J]. LIFE-BASEL, 2021, 11 (06):
  • [12] Understanding the diagnosis of prostate cancer
    Ong, Xuan Rui S.
    Bagguley, Dominic
    Yaxley, John W.
    Azad, Arun A.
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2020, 213 (09) : 424 - 429
  • [13] Onik G, 2010, SER BIOMED ENG, P235, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-05420-4_10
  • [14] Pathologic stage T2a and T2b prostate cancer in the recent prostate-specific antigen era: Implications for unilateral ablative therapy
    Polascik, Thomas J.
    Mayes, Janice M.
    Sun, Leon
    Madden, John F.
    Moul, Judd W.
    Mouraviev, Vladimir
    [J]. PROSTATE, 2008, 68 (13) : 1380 - 1386
  • [15] Long-Term Functional Outcomes after Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer
    Resnick, Matthew J.
    Koyama, Tatsuki
    Fan, Kang-Hsien
    Albertsen, Peter C.
    Goodman, Michael
    Hamilton, Ann S.
    Hoffman, Richard M.
    Potosky, Arnold L.
    Stanford, Janet L.
    Stroup, Antoinette M.
    Van Horn, R. Lawrence
    Penson, David F.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 368 (05) : 436 - 445
  • [16] Impact on genitourinary function and quality of life following focal irreversible electroporation of different prostate segments
    Scheltema, Matthijs J.
    Chang, John I.
    van den Bos, Willemien
    Gielchinsky, Ilan
    Nguyen, Tuan V.
    de Reijke, Theo M.
    Siriwardana, Amila R.
    Bohm, Maret
    de la Rosette, Jean J.
    Stricker, Phillip D.
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 24 (05): : 268 - 275
  • [17] Focal vs extended ablation in localized prostate cancer with irreversible electroporation; a multi-center randomized controlled trial
    Scheltema, Matthijs J. V.
    van den Bos, Willemien
    de Bruin, Daniel M.
    Wijkstra, Hessel
    Laguna, M. Pilar
    de Reijke, Theo M.
    de la Rosette, Jean J. M. C. H.
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2016, 16
  • [18] POSTOPERATIVE URINARY RETENTION IN GENERAL SURGICAL PATIENTS
    STALLARD, S
    PRESCOTT, S
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1988, 75 (11) : 1141 - 1143
  • [19] Focal irreversible electroporation for prostate cancer: functional outcomes and short-term oncological control
    Ting, F.
    Tran, M.
    Boehm, M.
    Siriwardana, A.
    Van Leeuwen, P. J.
    Haynes, A-M
    Delprado, W.
    Shnier, R.
    Stricker, P. D.
    [J]. PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2016, 19 (01) : 46 - 52
  • [20] Initial assessment of safety and clinical feasibility of irreversible electroporation in the focal treatment of prostate cancer
    Valerio, M.
    Strickert, P. D.
    Ahmed, H. U.
    Dickinson, L.
    Ponsky, L.
    Shnier, R.
    Allen, C.
    Emberton, M.
    [J]. PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2014, 17 (04) : 343 - 347