Personal exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: A comparative analysis of international, national, and regional guidelines

被引:4
|
作者
Ramirez-Vazquez, Raquel [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Escobar, Isabel [2 ,3 ]
Vandenbosch, Guy A. E. [4 ]
Arribas, Enrique [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Polytech Sch Cuenca, Appl Phys Dept, Univ Campus s n, Cuenca 16071, Spain
[2] Univ Castilla La Mancha, Fac Comp Sci Engn, Appl Phys Dept, Avda Espana s-n,Univ campus, Albacete 02071, Spain
[3] Univ Castilla La Mancha, MORFEO Res Grp, Ciudad Real, Spain
[4] Katholieke Univ Leuven, ESAT WaveCoRE, Dep Elect Engn, Kasteelpark Arenberg 10,Box 2444, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
关键词
RF-EMF personal exposure; Reference levels; International; National; And regional guidelines; ALARA and precautionary principle; WI-FI; LIMITS; RISK; RADIATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.envres.2024.118124
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A worldwide overview and analysis for the existing limits of human exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields (RF-EMF) is given in this paper. These reference levels have been established by different national and even regional governments, which can be based on the guidelines provided by the recommendations of the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), the International Committee on Electromagnetic Safety of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), and even in the United States of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), as well as, are based on the so-called precautionary principle. Explicit reference is made to the exposure limits adopted in countries or regions, such as Canada, Italy, Poland, Switzerland, China, Russia, France, and regions of Belgium (Brussels, Flanders, Wallonia), where the limits are much lower than the international standards. The limits are compared to a selected set of in-situ measurements. This clearly shows that the measured values are typically very small compared to the international standards but could be somewhat higher compared to the reduced limits. Based on this observation and the reasonable assumption that the sensitivity of people to Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) is the same everywhere (whole-body), we propose the idea to establish a worldwide reference limit for the general public, thus applicable in all countries, if the ICNIRP considers it appropriate. Research must continue to generate measurement data that demonstrate the levels of exposure to which we are really exposed, and with this, provide arguments to the organizations that established the guidelines, especially the ICNIRP, to evaluate whether the current limits are too much. High and can be modified when considered pertinent. To the best of our knowledge, at no time has the reference level for the general public been exceeded.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [21] Feasibility of a cohort study on health risks caused by occupational exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields
    Breckenkamp, Juergen
    Berg-Beckhoff, Gabriele
    Muenster, Eva
    Schuez, Joachim
    Schlehofer, Brigitte
    Wahrendorf, Juergen
    Blettner, Maria
    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2009, 8
  • [22] Public exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in everyday microenvironments: An updated systematic review for Europe
    Jalilian, Hamed
    Eeftens, Marloes
    Ziaei, Mansour
    Roosli, Martin
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2019, 176
  • [23] Mobile measurement of radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure level and statistical analysis
    Cansiz, Mustafa
    Abbasov, Teymuraz
    Kurt, Muhammed Bahattin
    Celik, Ali Recai
    MEASUREMENT, 2016, 86 : 159 - 164
  • [24] Electromagnetic field exposure assessment in Europe radiofrequency fields (10 MHz-6 GHz)
    Gajsek, Peter
    Ravazzani, Paolo
    Wiart, Joe
    Grellier, James
    Samaras, Theodoros
    Thuroczy, Gyoergy
    JOURNAL OF EXPOSURE SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (01) : 37 - 44
  • [25] Lack of Teratogenicity after Combined Exposure of Pregnant Mice to CDMA and WCDMA Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields
    Lee, Hae-June
    Lee, Jae-Seon
    Pack, Jeong-Ki
    Choi, Hyung-Do
    Kim, Nam
    Kim, Sung-Ho
    Lee, Yun-Sil
    RADIATION RESEARCH, 2009, 172 (05) : 648 - 652
  • [26] Changes in the excitability of primary hippocampal neurons following exposure to 3.0 GHz radiofrequency electromagnetic fields
    Echchgadda, Ibtissam
    Cantu, Jody C.
    Tolstykh, Gleb P.
    Butterworth, Joseph W.
    Payne, Jason A.
    Ibey, Bennett L.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [27] Analysis of gene expression in mouse brain regions after exposure to 1.9 GHz radiofrequency fields
    McNamee, James P.
    Bellier, Pascale V.
    Konkle, Anne T. M.
    Thomas, Reuben
    Wasoontarajaroen, Siriwat
    Lemay, Eric
    Gajda, Greg B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 2016, 92 (06) : 338 - 350
  • [28] Measurement and analysis of human exposure to electromagnetic fields in the GSM band
    Pasquino, Nicola
    MEASUREMENT, 2017, 109 : 373 - 383
  • [29] Protection of Workers Exposed to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields: A Perspective on Open Questions in the Context of the New ICNIRP 2020 Guidelines
    Jeschke, Peter
    Altekoster, Carsten
    Mild, Kjell Hansson
    Israel, Michel
    Ivanova, Mihaela
    Schiessl, Klaus
    Shalamanova, Tsvetelina
    Soyka, Florian
    Stam, Rianne
    Wilen, Jonna
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 10
  • [30] Frequency-Selective Evaluation of Personal Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields of Wireless Communications and Broadcast Transmitters
    Mimoza Ibrani
    Enver Hamiti
    Luan Ahma
    Doruntinë Berisha
    Wireless Personal Communications, 2016, 90 : 1355 - 1367