Impact of colorectal cancer screening on survival after metachronous metastasis

被引:2
|
作者
Hamers, Patricia A. H. [1 ,2 ]
Vink, Geraldine R. [1 ,3 ]
Elferink, Marloes A. G. [3 ]
Moons, Leon M. G. [4 ]
Punt, Cornelis J. A. [2 ]
May, Anne M. [2 ]
Koopman, Miriam [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Med Oncol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Comprehens Canc Org, Dept Res & Dev, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Gastroenterol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Internal mail Q 05-4-300,PO Box 85500, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Colorectal cancer; Population screening; Survival; Recurrence; Faecal occult blood test; Prognosis; III COLON-CANCER; EUROPEAN COUNTRIES; STAGE DISTRIBUTION; LIFE-STYLE; RECURRENCE; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113429
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: An increasing proportion of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases in Europe are detected by screening with faecal immunochemical testing (FIT). Previous studies showed that population screening with FIT leads to a decrease in CRC incidence and to detection at an earlier stage. However, approximately twenty percent of patients with CRC without metastases at initial diagnosis still develop metachronous metastases. We investigated the association between detection mode of the primary tumor and overall survival (OS) after metachronous metastasis in patients with CRC.Methods: Nationwide registry-based data was obtained of 794 patients who developed metachronous metastases after being diagnosed with stage I-III CRC between January and June 2015. With multivariable Cox PH regression modelling, we analyzed the (causal) association between detection mode of the primary tumor (FIT screen-detected versus non-screen-detected) and OS after metachronous metastasis while adjusting for potential confounders.Results: Median OS and five-year OS after metachronous metastasis were significantly higher for patients with screen-detected (n = 152) vs. non-screen-detected primary tumors (n = 642): 38.3 vs. 19.2 months, and 35.4% vs. 18.8%, respectively, p < 0.0001). After adjustment for potential confounders, the association between detection mode and OS after metachronous metastasis remained significant (HR 0.70 [95% CI 0.56-0.89]). Conclusions: Screen-detection of the primary tumor was independently associated with longer OS after metachronous metastasis. This may support the clinical utility of the population screening program and it shows the prognostic value of detection mode of the primary tumor once metachronous metastasis is diagnosed.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Radiofrequency Ablation for Metachronous Liver Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer after Curative Surgery
    In Ja Park
    Hee Cheol Kim
    Chang Sik Yu
    Pyo Nyun Kim
    Hyung Jin Won
    Jin Cheon Kim
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2008, 15 : 227 - 232
  • [32] Prognostic factors in survival of colorectal cancer patients after surgery
    Mehrkhani, F.
    Nasiri, S.
    Donboli, K.
    Meysamie, A.
    Hedayat, A.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2009, 11 (02) : 157 - 161
  • [33] Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Lopez, A.
    Manfredi, S.
    Faivre, J.
    ONCOLOGIE, 2014, 16 (11-12) : S491 - S498
  • [34] Brain metastasis from colorectal cancer: Treatment, survival, and prognosis
    Li, Wenxia
    Wang, Tongsheng
    Zhu, Yubing
    Yu, Haijiao
    Ma, Ling
    Ding, Yuhan
    Hong, Gao
    Lei, Ding
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (40) : E30273
  • [35] Extranodal Metastasis Predicts Poor Survival in Advanced Colorectal Cancer
    Tsutsumi, Soichi
    Watanabe, Reina
    Tabe, Yuichi
    Fujii, Takaaki
    Morita, Hiroki
    Kigure, Wakako
    Kato, Toshihide
    Yamauchi, Hayato
    Sakai, Makoto
    Asao, Takayuki
    Kuwano, Hiroyuki
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 59 (114) : 372 - 374
  • [36] Treatment and survival of patients with metachronous colorectal lung metastases
    Hansdotter, Pernilla
    Scherman, Peter
    Nikberg, Maziar
    Petersen, Sune H.
    Holmberg, Erik
    Rizell, Magnus
    Naredi, Peter
    Syk, Ingvar
    COLOFOL study grp
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 127 (05) : 806 - 814
  • [37] Circulating MIC-1/GDF15 is a complementary screening biomarker with CEA and correlates with liver metastasis and poor survival in colorectal cancer
    Wang, Xiaobing
    Yang, Zhaogang
    Tian, Haimei
    Li, Yanfen
    Li, Mo
    Zhao, Wenya
    Zhang, Chao
    Wang, Teng
    Liu, Jing
    Zhang, Aili
    Shen, Di
    Zheng, Cuining
    Qi, Jun
    Zhao, Dan
    Shi, Junfeng
    Jin, Liliang
    Rao, Jianyu
    Zhang, Wei
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (15) : 24892 - 24901
  • [38] Clinical characteristics and prognostic impact of direct distant organ metastasis in colorectal cancer
    Hsiao, Ching-Heng
    Li, Yen-Liang
    Kiu, Kee-Thai
    Yen, Min-Hsuan
    Chang, Tung-Cheng
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2024, 53
  • [39] Identification of Lifestyle Behaviors Associated with Recurrence and Survival in Colorectal Cancer Patients Using Random Survival Forests
    van Zutphen, Moniek
    van Duijnhoven, Franzel J. B.
    Wesselink, Evertine
    Schrauwen, Ruud W. M.
    Kouwenhoven, Ewout A.
    van Halteren, Henk K.
    de Wilt, Johannes H. W.
    Winkels, Renate M.
    Kok, Dieuwertje E.
    Boshuizen, Hendriek C.
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (10)
  • [40] Predictive factors of survival of colorectal cancer patients after para-aortic lymph node metastasis
    Nozawa, Hiroaki
    Kawai, Kazushige
    Sasaki, Kazuhito
    Emoto, Shigenobu
    Abe, Shinya
    Sonoda, Hirofumi
    Murono, Koji
    Kishikawa, Junko
    Nagai, Yuzo
    Yokoyama, Yuichiro
    Anzai, Hiroyuki
    Ishihara, Soichiro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 27 (03) : 520 - 527