共 50 条
Impact of colorectal cancer screening on survival after metachronous metastasis
被引:2
|作者:
Hamers, Patricia A. H.
[1
,2
]
Vink, Geraldine R.
[1
,3
]
Elferink, Marloes A. G.
[3
]
Moons, Leon M. G.
[4
]
Punt, Cornelis J. A.
[2
]
May, Anne M.
[2
]
Koopman, Miriam
[1
,5
]
机构:
[1] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Med Oncol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Comprehens Canc Org, Dept Res & Dev, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Gastroenterol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Internal mail Q 05-4-300,PO Box 85500, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词:
Colorectal cancer;
Population screening;
Survival;
Recurrence;
Faecal occult blood test;
Prognosis;
III COLON-CANCER;
EUROPEAN COUNTRIES;
STAGE DISTRIBUTION;
LIFE-STYLE;
RECURRENCE;
MORTALITY;
D O I:
10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113429
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Background: An increasing proportion of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases in Europe are detected by screening with faecal immunochemical testing (FIT). Previous studies showed that population screening with FIT leads to a decrease in CRC incidence and to detection at an earlier stage. However, approximately twenty percent of patients with CRC without metastases at initial diagnosis still develop metachronous metastases. We investigated the association between detection mode of the primary tumor and overall survival (OS) after metachronous metastasis in patients with CRC.Methods: Nationwide registry-based data was obtained of 794 patients who developed metachronous metastases after being diagnosed with stage I-III CRC between January and June 2015. With multivariable Cox PH regression modelling, we analyzed the (causal) association between detection mode of the primary tumor (FIT screen-detected versus non-screen-detected) and OS after metachronous metastasis while adjusting for potential confounders.Results: Median OS and five-year OS after metachronous metastasis were significantly higher for patients with screen-detected (n = 152) vs. non-screen-detected primary tumors (n = 642): 38.3 vs. 19.2 months, and 35.4% vs. 18.8%, respectively, p < 0.0001). After adjustment for potential confounders, the association between detection mode and OS after metachronous metastasis remained significant (HR 0.70 [95% CI 0.56-0.89]). Conclusions: Screen-detection of the primary tumor was independently associated with longer OS after metachronous metastasis. This may support the clinical utility of the population screening program and it shows the prognostic value of detection mode of the primary tumor once metachronous metastasis is diagnosed.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文