Evaluation of dowel bearing strength of fungal-decayed cross-laminated timber

被引:1
|
作者
Udele, Kenneth Emamoke [1 ,2 ]
Morrell, Jeffrey J. [1 ]
Newton, Anthony [1 ]
Sinha, Arijit [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Wood Sci & Engn, Corvallis, OR USA
[2] Oregon State Univ, Wood Sci & Engn, 119 Richardson Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
关键词
Dowel bearing strength; connection capacity; CLT; decay fungi; brown rot; HYGROTHERMAL PERFORMANCE; WALL ASSEMBLIES; WOOD; DEGRADATION; DURABILITY;
D O I
10.1080/17480272.2023.2269392
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学]; TS [轻工业、手工业、生活服务业];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ; 0822 ;
摘要
Dowel bearing strength of three cross-laminated timber (CLT) species (Douglas-fir, Norway spruce, spruce pine fir) were periodically assessed through 40 weeks of exposure to two brown rot fungi species (Gloeophyllum trabeum and Rhodonia placenta). Time-dependent regression models were developed to describe the relationship between level of fungal exposure and dowel bearing strength of CLT. Obtained dowel bearing strength values were used to predict the capacity of floor-to-wall CLT connection systems. Predicted strength values were compared with capacity of actual connection systems which were subjected to similar biodeterioration treatments. Significant reductions in the dowel bearing strength of CLT were observed 30 weeks after fungal inoculation. Similar patterns of degradation were observed for both fungi in all three CLT species, but R. placenta was slightly more aggressive than G. trabeum, causing a 16.2 MPa reduction in dowel bearing strength of Douglas-fir after 40 weeks of exposure. Connection capacities estimated using National Design Specification yield models for dowel type fasteners and the dowel bearing strength of fungal-damaged CLT were consistent with observed properties and were within 85% of actual capacity of connections tested, especially in early stages of decay.
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 572
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Monitoring Moisture Performance of Cross-Laminated Timber Building Elements during Construction
    Schmidt, Evan
    Riggio, Mariapaola
    BUILDINGS, 2019, 9 (06)
  • [42] Structural fire engineering considerations for cross-laminated timber walls
    Wiesner, Felix
    Hadden, Rory
    Deeny, Susan
    Bisby, Luke
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2022, 323
  • [43] Analysis of the seismic behavior of structures with cross-laminated timber panels
    Gonzalez-Rodrigo, Beatriz
    Fraile-de-Lerma, Alberto
    Mosquera-Feijoo, Juan-Carlos
    DYNA, 2018, 93 (02): : 204 - 210
  • [44] Picture frame and diagonal compression testing of cross-laminated timber
    Turesson, Jonas
    Bjornfot, Anders
    Berg, Sven
    Ekevad, Mats
    Tomasi, Roberto
    MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, 2019, 52 (04)
  • [45] New design approach for controlling brittle failure modes of small-dowel-type connections in Cross-laminated Timber (CLT)
    Zarnani, Pouyan
    Quenneville, Pierre
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2015, 100 : 172 - 182
  • [46] Diaphragm shear and diagonal compression testing of cross-laminated timber
    Sharifi, Jonas
    Sharifi, Zahra
    Berg, Sven
    Ekevad, Mats
    SN APPLIED SCIENCES, 2021, 3 (11):
  • [47] Diaphragm shear and diagonal compression testing of cross-laminated timber
    Jonas Sharifi
    Zahra Sharifi
    Sven Berg
    Mats Ekevad
    SN Applied Sciences, 2021, 3
  • [48] Hygrothermal characterization and modeling of cross-laminated timber in the building envelope
    Kordziel, Steven
    Glass, Samuel V.
    Boardman, Charles R.
    Munson, Robert A.
    Zelinka, Samuel L.
    Pei, Shiling
    Tabares-Velasco, Paulo Cesar
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 177 (177)
  • [49] Experimental determination of the charring rate of cross-laminated timber panels
    Alanen, Mika
    Malaska, Mikko
    Salminen, Mikko
    Paavola, Pyry
    Pajunen, Sami
    FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL, 2024, 146
  • [50] Projected Cross-Laminated Timber Demand and Lumber Supply Analysis
    Brandt, Kristin
    Latta, Greg
    Camenzind, Dane
    Dolan, Dan
    Bender, Don
    Wilson, Alex
    Wolcott, Michael
    BIORESOURCES, 2021, 16 (01) : 862 - 881