Implication of MRI Risk Stratification System on the Survival Benefits of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

被引:3
|
作者
Zhao, Rui [1 ]
Zhao, Wei [2 ]
Zhu, Yumeng [3 ]
Wan, Lijuan [1 ]
Chen, Shuang [1 ]
Zhao, Qing [1 ]
Zhao, Xinming [1 ]
Zhang, Hongmei [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Diag Radiol, Natl Canc Ctr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc,Canc Hosp, 17 Panjiayuan nanli, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Colorectal Surg, Natl Canc Ctr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc,Canc Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing 4 High Sch Int Campus, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Rectal cancer; Magnetic resonance imaging; Adjuvant chemotherapy; Distant metastasis; Survival analysis; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; POOLED ANALYSIS; FOLLOW-UP; STAGE; TUMOR; CHEMORADIATION; RADIOTHERAPY; RESECTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2023.05.031
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: To investigate the implication of a Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) risk stratification system on the selection of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) who can benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 328 patients with LARC who underwent NCRT and surgery. The median follow-up duration was 79 months (Interquartile range, 66-94 months). Cox logistic regression analysis was used to identify MRI risk factors and develop a risk stratification system to stratify patients into groups with high and low risks. Kaplan-Meier curves of distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) were used to show the benefits of ACT and stratify results based on the MRI risk stratification system and postoperative pathological staging. Results: An MRI risk stratification system was built based on four MRI risk factors, including MRI-identified T3b-T4 stage, N1-N2 stage, extramural venous invasion, and tumor deposits. 74 (22.6%) patients with 3-4 MRI risk factors were classified into the MRI high-risk group. ACT could significantly improve 5-year DMFS (19.2% versus 52.1%; p < 0.001) and OS (34.6% versus 75.0%; p < 0.001) for patients in the MRI high-risk group, while ACT had no survival benefit for patients in the MRI low-risk group. The benefits of ACT were not observed in patients with any pathological staging subgroups (ypT0-2N0, ypT3-4N0, and ypN+). Conclusion: Patients in the MRI high-risk group could benefit from ACT, regardless of postoperative pathological staging. Baseline MRI should be considered more in ACT decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:S164 / S175
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Improved Survival After Adjuvant Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients With Pathologic Complete Response
    Lai, Samuel H. H.
    Vogel, Jon D.
    Vemuru, Sudheer
    Messersmith, Wells
    Lieu, Christopher
    McCarter, Martin D.
    Birnbaum, Elisa
    Chapman, Brandon C.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2023, 66 (07) : 983 - 993
  • [32] Compatibility of MRI and Pathological Tumor Regression Grading in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer After Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
    Arslan, Alaettin
    Turk, Gamze
    Eren, Saliha Karagoz
    Akay, Ebru
    Ozhan, Nail
    Aral, Ipek Pinar
    TURK ONKOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 36 (04): : 468 - 477
  • [33] Is adjuvant chemotherapy necessary for locally advanced rectal cancer patients with pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and radical surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ma, Bin
    Ren, Yupeng
    Chen, Yue
    Lian, Bo
    Jiang, Peng
    Li, Yongmin
    Shang, Yan
    Meng, Qingkai
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2019, 34 (01) : 113 - 121
  • [34] Personalized total neoadjuvant therapy versus chemotherapy during the 'wait period' versus standard chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer
    Bedrikovetski, Sergei
    Traeger, Luke
    Fitzsimmons, Tracy
    Perry, Joanne
    Vather, Ryash
    Moore, James W. W.
    Sammour, Tarik
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, : 1267 - 1273
  • [35] Consolidation mFOLFOX6 Chemotherapy After Chemoradiotherapy Improves Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Final Results of a Multicenter Phase II Trial
    Marco, Michael R.
    Zhou, Lihong
    Patil, Sujata
    Marcet, Jorge E.
    Varma, Madhulika G.
    Oommen, Samuel
    Cataldo, Peter A.
    Hunt, Steven R.
    Kumar, Anjali
    Herzig, Daniel O.
    Fichera, Alessandro
    Polite, Blase N.
    Hyman, Neil H.
    Ternent, Charles A.
    Stamos, Michael J.
    Pigazzi, Alessio
    Dietz, David
    Yakunina, Yuliya
    Pelossof, Raphael
    Garcia-Aguilar, Julio
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2018, 61 (10) : 1146 - 1155
  • [36] Is adjuvant chemotherapy necessary for patients with ypT0-2N0 rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and curative surgery?
    Lu, Zhao
    Cheng, Pu
    Zhang, Ming-Guang
    Wang, Xi-Shan
    Zheng, Zhao-Xu
    GASTROENTEROLOGY REPORT, 2018, 6 (04): : 277 - 283
  • [38] Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Is It a Given?
    Hong, Theodore S.
    Ryan, David P.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2015, 33 (17) : 1878 - U31
  • [39] Survival outcomes of different neoadjuvant treatment regimens in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and MRI-detected extramural venous invasion
    Chen, Mo
    Ma, Yan
    Song, Yi-wen
    Huang, Jinhua
    Gao, Yuan-hong
    Zheng, Jian
    He, Fang
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (21): : 20523 - 20537
  • [40] Locally advanced rectal cancer: Preliminary results of rectal preservation after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
    Alberto Vaccaro, Carlos
    Julio Yazyi, Federico
    Ojra Quintana, Guillermo
    Pablo Santino, Juan
    Edith Sardi, Mabel
    Beder, Damian
    Tognelli, Joaquin
    Bonadeo, Fernando
    Maria Lastiri, Jose
    Leandro Rossi, Gustavo
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2016, 94 (05): : 274 - 279