Postoperative complications analysis of circular stapled versus linear stapled anastomosis for patients undergoing esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:1
作者
Gu, Hao-Yu [1 ]
Luo, Jing [2 ]
Qiang, Yong [2 ]
机构
[1] Nantong Univ, Med Coll, Nantong 226000, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] East Reg Mil Command Gen Hosp, Nanjing Jinling Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Nanjing 210000, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Anastomotic leakage; Anastomotic stricture; Circular; Linear; Anastomosis;
D O I
10.1186/s13019-023-02309-y
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe choice of anastomosis technique after esophagectomy is closely associated with the postoperative complications. Whether circular stapled or linear stapled anastomosis is the optimal technique has not been established. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to show the latest and most comprehensive published assessment of circular stapled anastomosis in comparison with linear stapled anastomosis in postoperative complications.MethodsDatabases (PubMed, Embase, Web of science, Cochrane Library) were searched for all randomized controlled trials and comparative studies comparing circular stapled anastomosis with linear stapled anastomosis after esophagectomy. The odd ratio and mean difference with 95% confidence interval were calculated. We used the Higgins I-2 statistics to assess the statistical heterogeneity between studies. Review manager (version 5.4) software was used in this analysis.ResultsSixteen studies with 2322 patients were included in our study. The study demonstrated that the use of linear stapled technique after esophagectomy could reduce the risk of both anastomotic leakage (P = 0.0003) and stricture (P < 0.00001) compared with circular stapled technique. Stratification by anastomotic site showed that no matter what kind of anastomotic site (cervical or thoracic anastomosis) was used, linear stapled anastomosis could effectively reduce the anastomotic stricture in comparison with circular stapled anastomosis. Moreover, linear stapled anastomosis could decrease the risk of thoracic anastomotic leakage. There were no significant differences between circle stapled anastomosis and linear stapled anastomosis in reflux esophagitis (P = 0.17), pneumonia (P = 0.91), operation time (P = 0.41) and hospital stay (P = 0.38).ConclusionsThe study suggested that linear stapled anastomosis could be considered to be an optimal treatment associated with a reduced risk of anastomotic leakage and stricture in comparison with circular stapled anastomosis.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [31] Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology - A proposal for reporting
    Stroup, DF
    Berlin, JA
    Morton, SC
    Olkin, I
    Williamson, GD
    Rennie, D
    Moher, D
    Becker, BJ
    Sipe, TA
    Thacker, SB
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (15): : 2008 - 2012
  • [32] VH C., 2013, GUT, V62, P961
  • [33] WP W., 2013, WORLD J SURG, V37, P1043, DOI [10.1007/s00268-013-1932-x, DOI 10.1007/S00268-013-1932-X]
  • [34] XK L., 2020, THORAC CANCER, V11, P2909, DOI [10.1111/1759-7714.13630, DOI 10.1111/1759-7714.13630]