High-intensity versus moderate-intensity statin treatment for patients with ischemic stroke: Nationwide cohort study

被引:3
作者
Bach, Frederikke
Skajaa, Nils
Esen, Buket Ozturk
Fuglsang, Cecilia Hvitfeldt
Horvath-Puho, Erzsebet
Sorensen, Henrik Toft
Adelborg, Kasper
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol, Dept Clin Med, Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
Statin; stroke; cohort study; population-based; new-user active-comparator; THERAPY; REGISTRATION; GUIDELINES; SYSTEM; RISK;
D O I
10.1177/23969873231193288
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Guidelines recommend high-intensity statin treatment after ischemic stroke, but evidence is sparse on the effectiveness and safety of different statin treatment intensities. We examined effectiveness and safety outcomes among patients initiating high-intensity versus moderate-intensity statins after ischemic stroke. Methods: In this population-based new-user active-comparator cohort study, we used the Danish Stroke Registry, covering all Danish hospitals, to identify patients with a first-time ischemic stroke during 2012-2021. Using multiple Danish registries, patients who redeemed a statin prescription within 21 days after stroke admission were classified as high-intensity statin initiators or moderate-intensity statin initiators. Propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance patient characteristics. We used competing risk methods to compute 5 year risk differences (RDs) and Cox proportional hazards regression to compute 5 year hazard ratios (HRs) of stroke recurrence, myocardial infarction, heart failure, venous thromboembolism, and all-cause mortality (effectiveness outcomes) and diabetes, liver disease, and kidney disease (safety outcomes). Results: High-intensity (n = 13,032) and moderate-intensity (n = 14,355) statin initiators were identified. Risks of most examined effectiveness outcomes were comparable between statin intensities. There was no clear association between statin intensity and stroke recurrence (RD: 0.8% [95% CI: 0.1, 1.4], HR: 1.08 [95% CI: 0.96, 1.22]). All-cause mortality was slightly reduced among high-intensity statin initiators (RD: -1.1% [95% CI: -0.1, -2.1], HR: 0.93 [95% CI: 0.85, 1.01]. Risks of most safety outcomes were comparable between statin intensities, but high-intensity statin use was associated with an increased risk of diabetes (RD: 1.2% [95% CI: 0.4, 1.9], HR: 1.10 [95% CI: 1.00, 1.21]). Discussion and conclusion: Compared with initiation of moderate-intensity statins, initiation of high-intensity statins after ischemic stroke was associated with similar risks of most effectiveness and safety outcomes. However, mortality risk was reduced, and diabetes risk was increased.
引用
收藏
页码:1041 / 1052
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] No evidence to support high-intensity statin in Chinese patients with coronary heart disease
    Dai, Wen
    Huang, Xian-sheng
    Zhao, Shui-ping
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 204 : 57 - 58
  • [32] Effects of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on vascular function among individuals with overweight and obesity-a systematic review
    Shishira, K. B.
    Vaishali, K.
    Kadavigere, Rajagopal
    Sukumar, Suresh
    Shivashankara, K. N.
    Pullinger, Samuel A.
    Bommasamudram, Tulasiram
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2024, 48 (11) : 1517 - 1533
  • [33] Acute high-intensity and moderate-intensity interval exercise do not change corticospinal excitability in low fit, young adults
    El-Sayes, Jenin
    Turco, Claudia V.
    Skelly, Lauren E.
    Locke, Mitchell B.
    Gibala, Martin J.
    Nelson, Aimee J.
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (01):
  • [34] High-intensity interval and moderate-intensity continuous training elicit similar enjoyment and adherence levels in overweight and obese adults
    Vella, Chantal A.
    Taylor, Katrina
    Drummer, Devin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SPORT SCIENCE, 2017, 17 (09) : 1203 - 1211
  • [35] High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on patient quality of life in cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yu, Haohan
    Zhao, Xudong
    Wu, Xiaoxia
    Yang, Jing
    Wang, Jun
    Hou, Lijuan
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01):
  • [36] High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gomes-Neto, Mansueto
    Duraes, Andre R.
    Correia dos Reis, Helena F.
    Neves, Victor R.
    Martinez, Bruno P.
    Carvalho, Vitor O.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 24 (16) : 1696 - 1707
  • [37] High-intensity interval training vs. moderate-intensity continuous exercise training in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a pilot study
    Angadi, Siddhartha S.
    Mookadam, Farouk
    Lee, Chong D.
    Tucker, Wesley J.
    Haykowsky, Mark J.
    Gaesser, Glenn A.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 119 (06) : 753 - 758
  • [38] Effects of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on cardiorespiratory and exercise capacity in patients with coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gao, Chao
    Yue, Yuchuan
    Wu, Dongmei
    Zhang, Junming
    Zhu, Shuyao
    PLOS ONE, 2025, 20 (02):
  • [39] Trends in the Use of Moderate-Intensity to High-Intensity Statin and Nonstatin Lipid-Lowering Therapy: Turning Off the Faucet Is Much More Valuable Than Mopping Up the Floor
    Blumenthal, Roger S.
    Gluckman, Ty J.
    Martin, Seth S.
    JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 2 (04) : 355 - 356
  • [40] Safety and Effectiveness of High-Intensity Statins Versus Low/Moderate-Intensity Statins Plus Ezetimibe in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease for Reaching LDL-C Goals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Soleimani, Hamidreza
    Mousavi, Asma
    Shojaei, Shayan
    Tavakoli, Kiarash
    Salabat, Dorsa
    Farahani Rad, Farid
    Askari, Mani K.
    Nelson, John
    Ruzieh, Mohammad
    Hosseini, Kaveh
    CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 47 (08)