The Implementation in Context (ICON) Framework: A meta-framework of context domains, attributes and features in healthcare

被引:7
作者
Squires, Janet E. [1 ,2 ]
Graham, Ian D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Santos, Wilmer J. [2 ]
Hutchinson, Alison M. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Sch Nursing, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Ottawa, Sch Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Deakin Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Geelong, Australia
[5] Barwon Hlth, Geelong, Australia
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Context; Framework; Healthcare; Implementation; Knowledge translation; KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION; DECISION AIDS;
D O I
10.1186/s12961-023-01028-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThere is growing evidence that context mediates the effects of implementation interventions intended to increase healthcare professionals' use of research evidence in clinical practice. However, conceptual clarity about what comprises context is elusive. The purpose of this study was to advance conceptual clarity on context by developing the Implementation in Context Framework, a meta-framework of the context domains, attributes and features that can facilitate or hinder healthcare professionals' use of research evidence and the effectiveness of implementation interventions in clinical practice.MethodsWe conducted a meta-synthesis of data from three interrelated studies: (1) a concept analysis of published literature on context (n = 70 studies), (2) a secondary analysis of healthcare professional interviews (n = 145) examining context across 11 unique studies and (3) a descriptive qualitative study comprised of interviews with heath system stakeholders (n = 39) in four countries to elicit their tacit knowledge on the attributes and features of context. A rigorous protocol was followed for the meta-synthesis, resulting in development of the Implementation in Context Framework. Following this meta-synthesis, the framework was further refined through feedback from experts in context and implementation science.ResultsIn the Implementation in Context Framework, context is conceptualized in three levels: micro (individual), meso (organizational), and macro (external). The three levels are composed of six contextual domains: (1) actors (micro), (2) organizational climate and structures (meso), (3) organizational social behaviour (meso), (4) organizational response to change (meso), (5) organizational processes (meso) and (6) external influences (macro). These six domains contain 22 core attributes of context and 108 features that illustrate these attributes.ConclusionsThe Implementation in Context Framework is the only meta-framework of context available to guide implementation efforts of healthcare professionals. It provides a comprehensive and critically needed understanding of the context domains, attributes and features relevant to healthcare professionals' use of research evidence in clinical practice. The Implementation in Context Framework can inform implementation intervention design and delivery to better interpret the effects of implementation interventions, and pragmatically guide implementation efforts that enhance evidence uptake and sustainability by healthcare professionals.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Advancing a Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors
    Aarons, Gregory A.
    Hurlburt, Michael
    Horwitz, Sarah McCue
    [J]. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2011, 38 (01) : 4 - 23
  • [2] Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, Embedded research
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, Implementing shared decision making Clinical teams' experiences of implementing shared decision making as part of the MAGIC programme
  • [4] Evaluating Clinical Implementation Approaches for Prostate Cancer Decision Support
    Berry, Donna L.
    Hong, Fangxin
    Halpenny, Barbara
    Sanda, Martin G.
    Master, Viraj A.
    Filson, Christopher P.
    Chang, Peter
    Chien, Gary W.
    Underhill, Meghan
    Fox, Erica
    McReynolds, Justin
    Wolpin, Seth
    [J]. UROLOGY PRACTICE, 2019, 6 (02) : 93 - 99
  • [5] Blalock H.M., 1979, SOCIAL STAT REVISED
  • [6] AN ANALYSIS OF TRANSFORMATIONS
    BOX, GEP
    COX, DR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1964, 26 (02) : 211 - 252
  • [7] Implementation science should give higher priority to health equity
    Brownson, Ross C.
    Kumanyika, Shiriki K.
    Kreuter, Matthew W.
    Haire-Joshu, Debra
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [8] Collins, DEF REL
  • [9] MEASURING NORMATIVE BELIEFS AND SHARED BEHAVIORAL EXPECTATIONS IN ORGANIZATIONS - THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE INVENTORY
    COOKE, RA
    SZUMAL, JL
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1993, 72 (03) : 1299 - 1330
  • [10] The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback
    Damschroder, Laura J.
    Reardon, Caitlin M.
    Widerquist, Marilla A. Opra
    Lowery, Julie
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2022, 17 (01)