Early versus late reversal of diverting loop ileostomy in rectal cancer surgery: a multicentre randomized controlled trial

被引:6
|
作者
Ellebaek, Mark Bremholm [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Perdawood, Sharaf Karim [4 ]
Steenstrup, Signe [1 ,3 ]
Khalaf, Sardar [1 ,3 ]
Kundal, Jette [1 ,3 ]
Moller, Soeren [2 ,3 ]
Bang, Jacob Christian [6 ]
Stovring, Jens [5 ]
Qvist, Niels [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Odense Univ Hosp, Res Unit Surg, Odense, Denmark
[2] Odense Univ Hosp, OPEN, Open Patient Data Explorat Network, Odense, Denmark
[3] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Clin Res, Odense, Denmark
[4] Slagelse Hosp, Dept Gastrointestinal Surg, Slagelse, Denmark
[5] Hosp South West Jutland, Dept Surg, Esbjerg, Denmark
[6] Svendborg Hosp, Dept Radiol, Svendborg, Denmark
关键词
STOMA CLOSURE; RESECTION; MORBIDITY; INDEX; RISK;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-33006-4
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Diverting loop ileostomy has become routine in low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer. The optimal time for stoma reversal is controversial. The aim of the present study was to compare the results after planned early (within 8-12 days) versus late (> 3 months) stoma reversal. The primary outcomes were morbidity and mortality, as measured by the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) within 30 days after stoma reversal, and the secondary outcomes were morbidity and mortality within 90 days after LAR. This was a multicentre trial including all patients scheduled for anterior low resection for rectal cancer with curative intent. Inclusion period was from April 2011 to December 2018. All patients were randomized 1:1 prior to surgery. Among 257 consecutive and eligible patients, a total of 214 patients were randomized: 107 patients to early stoma reversal and 107 to late reversal. A total of 68 patients were excluded for various reasons, and 146 patients completed the study, with 77 in the early reversal group and 69 in the late reversal group. The patients were asked to complete the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index before surgery (baseline) and at 6 and 12 months after LAR. Ostomy-related complications were evaluated by dedicated ostomy staff using the validated DET score. ClinicalTrials Identifier: NCT01865071. Fifty-three patients (69%) in the early reversal group and 60 patients (87%) in the late reversal group received the intended treatment. There were no significant differences in CCI within 90 days after index surgery with the LAR and within 30 days after stoma reversal between the two groups. There were no differences in patient-reported quality of life but significantly more stoma-related complications in the late reversal group. A total of 5 patients experienced anastomotic leakage (AL) after stoma reversal, 4 in the early reversal group and one in the late reversal group. Early and late stoma reversal showed similar outcomes in terms of overall complications and quality of life. The risk of developing anastomotic leakage after early ostomy reversal is a concern.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Loop ileostomy versus loop colostomy as temporary deviation after anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Prassas, Dimitrios
    Vossos, Vasileios
    Rehders, Alexander
    Knoefel, Wolfram Trudo
    Krieg, Andreas
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2020, 405 (08) : 1147 - 1153
  • [22] Reversal of Diverting Loop Ileostomy Using Hand-Sewn Side-to-Side versus End-to-End Anastomosis after Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Single Center Experience
    Prassas, Dimitrios
    Ntolia, Argyro
    Spiekermann, Jan-Dirk
    Rolfs, Thomas-Marten
    Schumacher, Franz-Josef
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2018, 84 (11) : 1741 - 1744
  • [23] Risk factors for complications after diverting ileostomy closure in patients who have undergone rectal cancer surgery
    Nakamura, Takatoshi
    Sato, Takeo
    Naito, Masanori
    Yamanashi, Takahiro
    Miura, Hirohisa
    Tsutsui, Atsuko
    Watanabe, Masahiko
    SURGERY TODAY, 2017, 47 (10) : 1238 - 1242
  • [24] Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer (REAL): short-term outcomes of a multicentre randomised controlled trial
    Feng, Qingyang
    Yuan, Weitang
    Li, Taiyuan
    Tang, Bo
    Jia, Baoqing
    Zhou, Yanbing
    Zhang, Wei
    Zhao, Ren
    Zhang, Cheng
    Cheng, Longwei
    Zhang, Xiaoqiao
    Liang, Fei
    He, Guodong
    Wei, Ye
    Xu, Jianmin
    LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 7 (11): : 991 - 1004
  • [25] Closure of Temporary Ileostomy 2 Versus 12 Weeks After Rectal Resection for Cancer A Word of Caution From a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial
    Elsner, Andreas T.
    Brosi, Philippe
    Walensi, Mikolaj
    Uhlmann, Michael
    Egger, Bernhard
    Glaser, Christine
    Maurer, Christoph A.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2021, 64 (11) : 1398 - 1406
  • [26] Ghost Ileostomy Versus Loop Ileostomy Following Oncologic Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    McKechnie, Tyler
    Lee, Jay
    Lee, Yung
    Tessier, Lea
    Amin, Nalin
    Doumouras, Aristithes
    Hong, Dennis
    Eskicioglu, Cagla
    SURGICAL INNOVATION, 2023, 30 (04) : 501 - 516
  • [27] Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Rectal Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of 7 Randomized Controlled Trials
    Li, Laiyuan
    Zhang, Weisheng
    Guo, Yinyin
    Wang, Xiaolin
    Yu, Huichuan
    Du, Binbin
    Yang, Xiongfei
    Luo, Yanxin
    SURGICAL INNOVATION, 2019, 26 (04) : 497 - 504
  • [28] Role of Chewing Gum in Reducing Postoperative Ileus after Reversal of Ileostomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Bhatti, Samiullah
    Malik, Yusra Jahangir
    Changazi, Shabbar Hussain
    Rahman, Usman Ali
    Malik, Awais Amjad
    Butt, Usman Ismat
    Umar, Muhammad
    Farooka, Muhammad Waris
    Ayyaz, Mahmood
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 45 (04) : 1066 - 1070
  • [29] An international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer
    Collinson, Fiona J.
    Jayne, David G.
    Pigazzi, Alessio
    Tsang, Charles
    Barrie, Jennifer M.
    Edlin, Richard
    Garbett, Christopher
    Guillou, Pierre
    Holloway, Ivana
    Howard, Helen
    Marshall, Helen
    McCabe, Christopher
    Pavitt, Sue
    Quirke, Phil
    Rivers, Carly S.
    Brown, Julia M. B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 27 (02) : 233 - 241
  • [30] The Relationship Between High-Output Stomas, Postoperative Ileus, and Readmission After Rectal Cancer Surgery With Diverting Ileostomy
    Lee, Naa
    Lee, Soo Young
    Kim, Chang Hyun
    Kwak, Han Deok
    Ju, Jae Kyun
    Kim, Hyeong Rok
    ANNALS OF COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2021, 37 (01) : 44 - 50