Environmental life cycle assessment of Finnish broiler chicken production-Focus on climate change and water scarcity impacts

被引:13
作者
Usva, Kirsi [1 ]
Hietala, Sanna [2 ]
Nousiainen, Jouni [1 ]
Vorne, Virpi [2 ]
Vieraankivi, Marja-Liisa [1 ]
Jallinoja, Marja [3 ]
Leinonen, Ilkka [3 ]
机构
[1] Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Sustainabil Sci & Indicators, Jokioinen, Finland
[2] Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Sustainabil Sci & Indicators, Oulu, Finland
[3] Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Sustainabil Sci & Indicators, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Broiler production; Life cycle assessment; Carbon footprint; Water scarcity; AWARE; PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; UNITED-KINGDOM; GREENHOUSE-GAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137097
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The production and consumption of poultry meat increases in Finland, but no updated information on the impact of broiler production on climate change has been available, and the impacts of broiler production on water scarcity have never been studied. The Life Cycle Assessment methodology was applied to quantify the climate change and water scarcity impacts of Finnish broiler chicken meat. For water scarcity, the AWARE method was applied for the first time as a characterisation method in broiler chicken production. To harmonize the LCA calculation, the European Commission's Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) guidelines were followed when applicable. The comprehensive primary data accounted for 89% of Finnish broiler chicken production in 2018. The climate impact of Finnish broiler chicken meat was found to be 2.37 kg CO2 eq./kg of carcass weight (CW), including the effect of land use change (LUC), and 1.82 kg CO2 eq./kg of CW, excluding LUC. The relative share of the feed chain of the climate change impact of Finnish chicken meat was almost four fifths (79%). The water scarcity impact of Finnish chicken meat was 0.55 m3 eq. (AWARE)/kg CW. More than four fifths (82%) of the water scarcity impact of broiler production are formed in the feed chain. In addition to the national-level results, farm-specific results were calculated for 20 farms to indicate the variation and targets for improvements. In this study, we demonstrated that feeds were even more important in the water scarcity impact category.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Life cycle assessment of cane sugar production: The environmental contribution to human health, climate change, ecosystem quality and resources in Mexico [J].
Meza-Palacios, Ramiro ;
Aguilar-Lasserre, Alberto A. ;
Morales-Mendoza, Luis F. ;
Perez-Gallardo, Jorge R. ;
Rico-Contreras, Jose O. ;
Avarado-Lassman, Alejandro .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 54 (07) :668-678
[42]   Life cycle assessment of typical methanol production routes: The environmental impacts analysis and power optimization [J].
Chen, Zhuo ;
Shen, Qun ;
Sun, Nannan ;
Wei, Wei .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 220 :408-416
[43]   Environmental impacts of extensive and intensive beef production systems in Thailand evaluated by life cycle assessment [J].
Ogino, Akifumi ;
Sommart, Kritapon ;
Subepang, Sayan ;
Mitsumori, Makoto ;
Hayashi, Keisuke ;
Yamashita, Takahiro ;
Tanaka, Yasuo .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 112 :22-31
[44]   Environmental impacts of bicycle production in Bangladesh: a cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment approach [J].
Roy, Papon ;
Miah, Md. Danesh ;
Zafar, Md. Tasneem .
SN APPLIED SCIENCES, 2019, 1 (07)
[45]   Environmental Impacts Associated with Intensive Production in Pig Farms in Mexico through Life Cycle Assessment [J].
Rafael Giraldi-Diaz, Mario ;
Castillo-Gonzalez, Eduardo ;
De Medina-Salas, Lorena ;
Velasquez-De la Cruz, Raul ;
Daniel Huerta-Silva, Hector .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (20)
[46]   Environmental impacts of bicycle production in Bangladesh: a cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment approach [J].
Papon Roy ;
Md. Danesh Miah ;
Md. Tasneem Zafar .
SN Applied Sciences, 2019, 1
[47]   Evaluation of environmental impacts of cotton polo shirt production in Bangladesh using life cycle assessment [J].
Islam, Shafiqul ;
Hasan, A. K. M. Mehedi ;
Bhuiyan, Muhammad Abdur Rahman ;
Bhat, Gajanan .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 926
[48]   Predicting environmental impacts of smallholder wheat production by coupling life cycle assessment and machine learning [J].
Yu, Chunxiao ;
Xu, Gang ;
Cai, Ming ;
Li, Yuan ;
Wang, Lijia ;
Zhang, Yan ;
Lin, Huilong .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 921
[49]   Environmental impacts, life cycle assessment and potential improvement measures for cement production: a literature review [J].
Andres Salas, Daniel ;
Diego Ramirez, Angel ;
Raul Rodriguez, Carlos ;
Marx Petroche, Daniel ;
Jael Boero, Andrea ;
Duque-Rivera, Jorge .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 113 :114-122
[50]   Life cycle environmental impacts and costs of water electrolysis technologies for green hydrogen production in the future [J].
Koj, Jan Christian ;
Zapp, Petra ;
Wieland, Christoph ;
Goerner, Klaus ;
Kuckshinrichs, Wilhelm .
ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY AND SOCIETY, 2024, 14 (01)