Environmental life cycle assessment of Finnish broiler chicken production-Focus on climate change and water scarcity impacts

被引:13
作者
Usva, Kirsi [1 ]
Hietala, Sanna [2 ]
Nousiainen, Jouni [1 ]
Vorne, Virpi [2 ]
Vieraankivi, Marja-Liisa [1 ]
Jallinoja, Marja [3 ]
Leinonen, Ilkka [3 ]
机构
[1] Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Sustainabil Sci & Indicators, Jokioinen, Finland
[2] Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Sustainabil Sci & Indicators, Oulu, Finland
[3] Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Sustainabil Sci & Indicators, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Broiler production; Life cycle assessment; Carbon footprint; Water scarcity; AWARE; PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; UNITED-KINGDOM; GREENHOUSE-GAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137097
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The production and consumption of poultry meat increases in Finland, but no updated information on the impact of broiler production on climate change has been available, and the impacts of broiler production on water scarcity have never been studied. The Life Cycle Assessment methodology was applied to quantify the climate change and water scarcity impacts of Finnish broiler chicken meat. For water scarcity, the AWARE method was applied for the first time as a characterisation method in broiler chicken production. To harmonize the LCA calculation, the European Commission's Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) guidelines were followed when applicable. The comprehensive primary data accounted for 89% of Finnish broiler chicken production in 2018. The climate impact of Finnish broiler chicken meat was found to be 2.37 kg CO2 eq./kg of carcass weight (CW), including the effect of land use change (LUC), and 1.82 kg CO2 eq./kg of CW, excluding LUC. The relative share of the feed chain of the climate change impact of Finnish chicken meat was almost four fifths (79%). The water scarcity impact of Finnish chicken meat was 0.55 m3 eq. (AWARE)/kg CW. More than four fifths (82%) of the water scarcity impact of broiler production are formed in the feed chain. In addition to the national-level results, farm-specific results were calculated for 20 farms to indicate the variation and targets for improvements. In this study, we demonstrated that feeds were even more important in the water scarcity impact category.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators: impacts of climate change, fine particulate matter formation, water consumption and land use
    Jolliet, Olivier
    Anton, Assumpcio
    Boulay, Anne-Marie
    Cherubini, Francesco
    Fantke, Peter
    Levasseur, Annie
    McKone, Thomas E.
    Michelsen, Ottar
    Mila i Canals, Llorenc
    Motoshita, Masaharu
    Pfister, Stephan
    Verones, Francesca
    Vigon, Bruce
    Frischknecht, Rolf
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (11) : 2189 - 2207
  • [22] Optimization of energy consumption and environmental impacts of arecanut production through coupled data envelopment analysis and life cycle assessment
    Paramesh, Venkatesh
    Arunachalam, Vadivel
    Nikkhah, Amin
    Das, Bappa
    Ghnimi, Sami
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 203 : 674 - 684
  • [23] Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators: impacts of climate change, fine particulate matter formation, water consumption and land use
    Olivier Jolliet
    Assumpció Antón
    Anne-Marie Boulay
    Francesco Cherubini
    Peter Fantke
    Annie Levasseur
    Thomas E. McKone
    Ottar Michelsen
    Llorenç Milà i Canals
    Masaharu Motoshita
    Stephan Pfister
    Francesca Verones
    Bruce Vigon
    Rolf Frischknecht
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23 : 2189 - 2207
  • [24] Determination of the life cycle climate change impacts of land use and albedo change in algal biofuel production
    Fortier, Marie-Odile P.
    Roberts, Griffin W.
    Stagg-Williams, Susan M.
    Sturm, Belinda S. M.
    ALGAL RESEARCH-BIOMASS BIOFUELS AND BIOPRODUCTS, 2017, 28 : 270 - 281
  • [25] Environmental impact assessment of Finnish feed crop production with methodological comparison of PEF and IPCC methods for climate change impact
    Hietala, Sanna
    Usva, Kirsi
    Nousiainen, Jouni
    Vieraankivi, Marja-Liisa
    Vorne, Virpi
    Leinonen, Ilkka
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 379
  • [26] Assessment of future water resources and water scarcity considering the factors of climate change and social–environmental change in Han River basin, Korea
    Soojun Kim
    Byung Sik Kim
    Hwandon Jun
    Hung Soo Kim
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2014, 28 : 1999 - 2014
  • [27] Environmental impacts of wheat-based vodka production using life cycle assessment
    Bhattacharyya, Nirvan
    Goodell, Amy
    Rogers, Sarah
    Demond, Avery
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 231 : 642 - 648
  • [28] Global environmental impacts of silver nanoparticle production methods supported by life cycle assessment
    Temizel-Sekeryan S.
    Hicks A.L.
    Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2020, 156
  • [29] Global environmental impacts of silver nanoparticle production methods supported by life cycle assessment
    Temizel-Sekeryan, Sila
    Hicks, Andrea L.
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2020, 156
  • [30] The Life-cycle Assessment and Environmental Impacts of Electricity Production in Porto Santo Island
    Torabi, Roham
    Rizzoli, Nicolo
    Arosio, Valeria
    Morgado-Dias, F.
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE IN ENERGY AND SUSTAINABILITY IN SMALL DEVELOPING ECONOMIES (ES2DE), 2017,