Face-to-face vs. blended learning in higher education: a quantitative analysis of biological science student outcomes

被引:3
作者
Harper, Claire V. [1 ]
Mccormick, Lucy M. [1 ]
Marron, Linda [2 ]
机构
[1] Edge Hill Univ, Fac Arts & Sci, Biol Dept, Ormskirk L39 4QP, England
[2] Edge Hill Univ, Ctr Learning & Teaching, Ormskirk L39 4QP, England
关键词
Face-to-face; Blended online learning; Higher education; Teaching; Assessment; SELF-EFFICACY; ONLINE; ACHIEVEMENT; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1186/s41239-023-00435-0
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The COVID-19 pandemic caused a rapid seismic shift to online delivery in otherwise face-to-face higher education settings worldwide. This quantitative research study sought to investigate the effect of different delivery styles and assessment types on student outcomes. Specifically, grades achieved by first year undergraduate Biological Science students at a UK Higher Education institution were compared from seven modules across two different academic years, namely 2018-2019 and 2020-2021. The academic year 2018-2019 was delivered in the traditional face-to-face manner whereas the 2020-2021 method of delivery was via blended learning. The results showed that four of the seven modules were negatively affected by the transition from face-to-face to blended delivery (p < 0.05, T-test). One module was unaffected (p > 0.05, T-test) and the remaining two modules were positively affected (p < 0.05, T-test). However, the percentage of students requiring reassessments increased with blended learning delivery although this was not significant (p < 0.05, T-test). In summary, the majority of individual module marks decreased with blended learning compared to face-to-face delivery, with an associated increase in required reassessments. Although there are positive benefits to incorporating an element of online learning for students, it is important to utilise this information in future module delivery planning to support the varying student cohorts of the future.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [21] Jacob S., 2016, International Journal of Innovative Research Development, V5, P196
  • [22] Face-to-face or face-to-screen? Undergraduates' opinions and test performance in classroom vs. online learning
    Kemp, Nenagh
    Grieve, Rachel
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
  • [23] Khan UR, 2021, J UNIV TEACH LEARN P, V18
  • [24] An effective blended online teaching and learning strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Lapitan, Lorico DS., Jr.
    Tiangco, Cristina E.
    Sumalinog, Divine Angela G.
    Sabarillo, Noel S.
    Diaz, Joey Mark
    [J]. EDUCATION FOR CHEMICAL ENGINEERS, 2020, 35 : 116 - 131
  • [25] Lyon A., 2020, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
  • [26] The COVID-19 pandemic and E-learning: challenges and opportunities from the perspective of students and instructors
    Maatuk, Abdelsalam M.
    Elberkawi, Ebitisam K.
    Aljawarneh, Shadi
    Rashaideh, Hasan
    Alharbi, Hadeel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2022, 34 (01) : 21 - 38
  • [27] How do students perceive face-to-face/blended learning as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic?
    Mali, Dafydd
    Lim, Hyoungjoo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION, 2021, 19 (03)
  • [28] Students' performance in blended learning: disciplinary difference and instructional design factors
    Minh Hien Vo
    Zhu, Chang
    Anh Nguyet Diep
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS IN EDUCATION, 2020, 7 (04) : 487 - 510
  • [29] Emergent transition from face-to-face to online learning in a South African University in the context of the Coronavirus pandemic
    Mpungose, Cedric B.
    [J]. HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 7 (01):
  • [30] Nasution AKP., 2021, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, V1783