Face-to-face vs. blended learning in higher education: a quantitative analysis of biological science student outcomes

被引:3
作者
Harper, Claire V. [1 ]
Mccormick, Lucy M. [1 ]
Marron, Linda [2 ]
机构
[1] Edge Hill Univ, Fac Arts & Sci, Biol Dept, Ormskirk L39 4QP, England
[2] Edge Hill Univ, Ctr Learning & Teaching, Ormskirk L39 4QP, England
关键词
Face-to-face; Blended online learning; Higher education; Teaching; Assessment; SELF-EFFICACY; ONLINE; ACHIEVEMENT; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1186/s41239-023-00435-0
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The COVID-19 pandemic caused a rapid seismic shift to online delivery in otherwise face-to-face higher education settings worldwide. This quantitative research study sought to investigate the effect of different delivery styles and assessment types on student outcomes. Specifically, grades achieved by first year undergraduate Biological Science students at a UK Higher Education institution were compared from seven modules across two different academic years, namely 2018-2019 and 2020-2021. The academic year 2018-2019 was delivered in the traditional face-to-face manner whereas the 2020-2021 method of delivery was via blended learning. The results showed that four of the seven modules were negatively affected by the transition from face-to-face to blended delivery (p < 0.05, T-test). One module was unaffected (p > 0.05, T-test) and the remaining two modules were positively affected (p < 0.05, T-test). However, the percentage of students requiring reassessments increased with blended learning delivery although this was not significant (p < 0.05, T-test). In summary, the majority of individual module marks decreased with blended learning compared to face-to-face delivery, with an associated increase in required reassessments. Although there are positive benefits to incorporating an element of online learning for students, it is important to utilise this information in future module delivery planning to support the varying student cohorts of the future.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Akella S., 2017, DJ Journal of Engineering and Applied Mathematics, V4, P20, DOI [10.18831/djmaths.org/2018011002, DOI 10.18831/DJMATHS.ORG/2018011002]
  • [2] Online and face-to-face classroom multitasking and academic performance: Moderated mediation with self-efficacy for self-regulated learning and gender
    Alghamdi, Ahlam
    Karpinski, Aryn C.
    Lepp, Andrew
    Barkley, Jacob
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2020, 102 : 214 - 222
  • [3] Avella JT, 2016, ONLINE LEARN, V20, P13
  • [4] Academic and emotional effects of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic on engineering students
    Balta-Salvador, Roso
    Olmedo-Torre, Noelia
    Pena, Marta
    Renta-Davids, Ana-Ines
    [J]. EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2021, 26 (06) : 7407 - 7434
  • [5] Post-COVID-19 Adaptations; the Shifts Towards Online Learning, Hybrid Course Delivery and the Implications for Biosciences Courses in the Higher Education Setting
    Bashir, Amreen
    Bashir, Shahreen
    Rana, Karan
    Lambert, Peter
    Vernallis, Ann
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2021, 6
  • [6] Bates T., 2014, Online Learning and Distance Education Resources
  • [7] Benson R, 2010, ONLINE LEARNING AND ASSESSMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A PLANNING GUIDE, P1
  • [8] Traditional Versus Online Biology Courses: Connecting Course Design and Student Learning in an Online Setting
    Biel, Rachel
    Brame, Cynthia J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY & BIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2016, 17 (03) : 417 - 422
  • [9] Bliuc Ana-Maria, 2007, The Internet and Higher Education, V10, P231, DOI 10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.08.001
  • [10] Bryan A., 2016, B S URAL STATE U SER, V8, P24, DOI DOI 10.14529/PED160204