Standard internal limiting membrane peeling versus internal limiting membrane abrasion technique for primary epiretinal membrane surgery

被引:1
|
作者
Bagci, Fatma [1 ]
Citirik, Mehmet [1 ]
Dulger, Selda Celik [1 ]
Teke, Mehmet Yasin [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hlth Sci, Ulucanlar Eye Training & Res Hosp, Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
Epiretinal membrane; Vitrectomy; Diamond-dusted membrane scraper; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; THICKNESS MACULAR HOLE; FIBER LAYER APPEARANCE; INDOCYANINE GREEN; REMOVAL; VITRECTOMY; PUCKER;
D O I
10.5935/0004-2749.2021-0208
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
| Purposes: The purpose of this study is to compare the standard inner limiting membrane peeling technique to the inner limiting membrane abrasion technique with respect to visual outcomes and central retinal thickness in the primary epiretinal membrane surgery. Methods: A total of 59 eyes from 57 epiretinal membrane patients were separated into two groups including the standard inner limiting membrane peeling group and the inner limiting membrane peeling with abrasion technique group. At 6, 12, and 24 months of follow-up, the mean alteration in best-corrected visual acuity and central retinal thickness were assessed for each group. Results: The study includes 32 (54%) standard inner peeling and 27 (46%) inner limiting membrane peeling with abrasion technique patients. The mean preoperative logMAR best-corrected visual acuity for the standard inner limiting membrane peeling and inner limiting membrane peeling with abrasion groups was 0.73 (+/- 0.29) and 0.61 (+/- 0.3) respectively. At 6, 12, and 24 months of follow-up, the best-corrected visual acuity improved significantly in each group. At each period of observation, the alteration in best-corrected visual acuity was not statistically significant (p=0.54, p=0.52, p=0.67). When comparing the alterations between the standard inner limiting membrane peeling and inner limiting membrane peeling with abrasion technique groups at 6 months (p=0.26) and 24 months (p=0.06), no statistically significant differences were observed, but they were statistically different at 12 months (p=0.03), reflecting a greater reduction in central retinal thickness for the inner limiting membrane peeling with abrasion technique group after one year. Conclusion: Abrasion of the inner limiting membrane with a diamond-dusted membrane scraper during epiretinal membrane surgery demonstrates similar effectiveness to the standard inner limiting membrane peeling technique. At 12 months, retinal thinning was found to be more significant in inner limiting membrane peeling with abrasion technique patients in terms of central retinal thickness values. As a result, it may be argued that the inner limiting membrane abrasion technique eliminates the inner limiting membrane and related structures more effectively while inflicting less retinal damage.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Conventional internal limiting membrane peeling versus temporal inverted internal limiting membrane flap for large macular holes
    Avci, Remzi
    Yildiz, Aysegul Mavi
    Yilmaz, Sami
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 31 (02) : 679 - 687
  • [22] Isolated Central Epiretinal Membrane: A Rare Complication of Fovea-Sparing Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Technique
    Chen, Yen-Chih
    Chen, San-Ni
    JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 2021
  • [23] DETRIMENTAL EFFECTS OF ACTIVE INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING DURING EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE SURGERY Microperimetric Analysis
    Deltour, Jean-Baptiste
    Grimbert, Pierre
    Masse, Helene
    Lebreton, Olivier
    Weber, Michel
    RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 2017, 37 (03): : 544 - 552
  • [24] Residual internal limiting membrane in epiretinal membrane surgery
    Kifuku, K.
    Hata, Y.
    Kohno, R-i
    Kawahara, S.
    Mochizuki, Y.
    Enaida, H.
    Sonoda, K-h
    Ishibashi, T.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 93 (08) : 1016 - 1019
  • [25] Multilayered inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus standard internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular holes: A comparative study
    Agrawal, Vishal
    Jindal, Khushbu
    Dhakad, Yogendra
    Rathore, Priyanka
    Khilnani, Kamlesh
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 70 (03) : 909 - 913
  • [26] RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING MICROSERRATED VERSUS CONVENTIONAL INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FORCEPS FOR INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING
    Starr, Matthew R.
    Hinkle, John C.
    Patel, Luv G.
    Ammar, Michael J.
    Soares, Rebecca R.
    Patel, Samir N.
    Cohen, Michael N.
    Hsu, Jason
    Yonekawa, Yoshihiro
    Ho, Allen C.
    Regillo, Carl D.
    Gupta, Omesh P.
    RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 2024, 44 (08): : 1323 - 1328
  • [27] PHOTORECEPTOR CHANGE AND VISUAL OUTCOME AFTER IDIOPATHIC EPIRETINAL MEMBRANE REMOVAL WITH OR WITHOUT ADDITIONAL INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING
    Ahn, Seong Joon
    Ahn, Jeeyun
    Woo, Se Joon
    Park, Kyu Hyung
    RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 2014, 34 (01): : 172 - 181
  • [28] Imaging the Area of Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling after Macular Hole Surgery
    Clemens, Christoph R.
    Obergassel, Justus
    Heiduschka, Peter
    Eter, Nicole
    Alten, Florian
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (13)
  • [29] Intraoperative OCT-Guided Selective Epiretinal Membrane (ERM) Peeling Versus ERM and Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Tractional Macular Edema in Diabetic Eyes
    Pignatelli, Francesco
    Niro, Alfredo
    Viggiano, Pasquale
    Boscia, Giacomo
    Addabbo, Giuseppe
    Boscia, Francesco
    Iaculli, Cristiana
    Giancipoli, Ermete
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (23)
  • [30] TO PEEL OR NOT TO PEEL THE INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE IN IDIOPATHIC EPIRETINAL MEMBRANES
    Diaz-Valverde, Andrea
    Wu, Lihteh
    RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 2018, 38 : S5 - S11