Effects of concave facing profile on the internal stability of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls

被引:4
作者
Ge, Bin [1 ]
Gao, Yufeng [1 ]
Zhang, Fei [1 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Coll Civil & Transportat Engn, Key Lab, Minist Educ Geomech & Embankment Engn, Nanjing 210098, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Concave facing; Geosynthetics; Internal stability; Limit equilibrium analysis; Reinforced soil wall; RETAINING WALLS; SLOPES; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1007/s11440-023-02078-x
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Previous research has demonstrated that concave cross-sectional geometry can enhance slope stability, reduce sediment loss, and improve mining efficiency. However, studies on the use of concave facing in geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) walls are limited. This study idealizes the concave facing as a circular arc whose concavity is determined by the wall height, batter and mid-chord offset. Based on the limit equilibrium analysis, a modified top-down procedure is proposed to investigate the impact of concave facing on the internal stability of GRS walls. Using the presented method, the distribution of required tension along the reinforcement layer and necessary connection load can obtain while considering the pullout capacity at a given layout and factor of safety. Sensitivity analysis, including the mid-chord offset, wall batter, reinforcement length, vertical spacing, and facing blocks, are carried out to explore the impacts of facing profile concavity on the internal stability of GRS walls. Results show that concave facing can significantly reduce the required tension along the reinforcement, and the required connection strength is sensitive to the variation in the facing profile. Increasing the wall batter can result in a greater reduction of maximum required tension for the concave wall, but it can also increase the connection load for most reinforcements. The concavity of the facing has no effect on the optimal reinforcement length, which is found to be 0.7 times the wall height. The differences in maximum required tension for various facing concavities gradually diminish when considering the toe resistance.
引用
收藏
页码:5941 / 5957
页数:17
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] AASHTO, 2020, Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges
  • [2] Pseudo-static analysis of reinforced earth retaining walls
    Alhajj Chehade, H.
    Dias, D.
    Sadek, M.
    Jenck, O.
    Hage Chehade, F.
    [J]. ACTA GEOTECHNICA, 2021, 16 (07) : 2275 - 2289
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, Design and Construction of Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes-Volume I
  • [4] Culmann K, 1866, Die graphische statik. Theorie der stutz und futtermauern
  • [5] Effects of seismic amplification on the stability design of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls
    Ge, Bin
    Ruan, Huaining
    Shu, Shuang
    Zhang, Fei
    Gao, Yufeng
    [J]. GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2022, 50 (05) : 881 - 895
  • [6] General analytical framework for design of flexible reinforced earth structures
    Han, Jie
    Leshchinsky, Dov
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 132 (11) : 1427 - 1435
  • [7] Recent advances in geosynthetic-reinforced retaining walls for highway applications
    Han, Jie
    Jiang, Yan
    Xu, Cao
    [J]. FRONTIERS OF STRUCTURAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2018, 12 (02) : 239 - 247
  • [8] Stability and Evolution of Planar and Concave Slopes under Unsaturated and Rainfall Conditions
    Hassanikhah, Arash
    Drumm, Eric C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2020, 20 (07)
  • [9] Design of Stable Concave Slopes for Reduced Sediment Delivery
    Jeldes, Isaac A.
    Drumm, Eric C.
    Yoder, Daniel C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 141 (02)
  • [10] Leshchinsky D., 1995, GEOSYNTH INT, V2, P845, DOI DOI 10.1680/GEIN.2.0039