Active involvement of people with lived experience of suicide in suicide research: a Delphi consensus study

被引:13
作者
Krysinska, Karolina [1 ]
Ozols, Ingrid [2 ]
Ross, Anna [1 ]
Andriessen, Karl [1 ]
Banfield, Michelle [3 ]
McGrath, Martina [1 ]
Edwards, Bronwen [4 ]
Hawgood, Jacinta [5 ]
Kolves, Kairi [5 ]
Ross, Victoria [5 ]
Pirkis, Jane [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Mental Hlth, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Mentalhlth Work, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Australian Natl Univ, Ctr Mental Hlth Res, Canberra, ACT, Australia
[4] Roses Ocean, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[5] Griffith Univ, Australian Inst Suicide Res & Prevent, Sch Appl Psychol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Co-production; Consumers; Delphi study; Guidelines; Lived experience of suicide; Suicide research; SOCIAL CARE RESEARCH; PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT; CONSUMER RESEARCHERS; RESEARCH PRIORITIES; HEALTH RESEARCH; PATIENT; PARTICIPATION; PREVENTION; RECOVERY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s12888-023-04973-9
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe importance and value of involvement of people with lived experience of suicide has been recognized in suicide research and prevention. Nonetheless, clear guidance on research collaboration and co-production is lacking. This study aimed to address this gap by developing a set of guidelines on active involvement of people with lived experience of suicide in suicide studies., i.e., conducting research with or by people with lived experience, rather than to, about or for them.MethodsThe Delphi method was used to determine statements on best practice for the active involvement of people with lived experience of suicide in suicide research. Statements were compiled through a systematic search of the scientific and grey literature, and reviewing qualitative data from a recent related study conducted by the authors. Two expert panels: people with lived experience of suicide (n = 44) and suicide researchers (n = 29) rated statements over three rounds of an online survey. Statements endorsed by at least 80% of panellists of each panel were included in the guidelines.ResultsPanellists endorsed 96 out of 126 statements in 17 sections covering the full research cycle from deciding on the research question and securing funding, to conducting research and disseminating and implementing outcomes. Overall, there was a substantial level of agreement between the two panels regarding support from research institutions, collaboration and co-production, communication and shared decision making, conducting research, self-care, acknowledgment, and dissemination and implementation. However, panels also disagreed on specific statements regarding representativeness and diversity, managing expectations, time and budgeting, training, and self-disclosure.ConclusionsThis study identified consensus recommendations on active involvement of people with lived experience of suicide in suicide research, including co-production. Support from research institutions and funders, and training on co-production for researchers and people with lived experience, are needed for successful implementation and uptake of the guidelines.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Toward a robust science of suicide: Epistemological, theoretical, and methodological considerations in advancing suicidology [J].
Abrutyn, Seth ;
Mueller, Anna S. .
DEATH STUDIES, 2021, 45 (07) :522-527
[2]   Challenges and adaptations to public involvement with marginalised groups during the COVID-19 pandemic: commentary with illustrative case studies in the context of patient safety research [J].
Isabel Adeyemi ;
Caroline Sanders ;
Bie Nio Ong ;
Kelly Howells ;
Leah Quinlivan ;
Louise Gorman ;
Sally Giles ;
Mat Amp ;
Elizabeth Monaghan ;
Sumaira Naseem ;
Adam Pearson ;
Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi .
Research Involvement and Engagement, 8 (1)
[3]   Learning from consumers: An eDelphi study of Australian mental health consumers' priorities for recovery-oriented curricula [J].
Arblaster, Karen ;
Mackenzie, Lynette ;
Matthews, Lynda ;
Willis, Karen ;
Gill, Katherine ;
Hanlon, Paula ;
Laidler, Rachael .
AUSTRALIAN OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY JOURNAL, 2018, 65 (06) :586-597
[4]   LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION [J].
ARNSTEIN, SR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PLANNERS, 1969, 35 (04) :216-224
[5]   Lived experience researchers partnering with consumers and carers to improve mental health research: Reflections from an Australian initiative [J].
Banfield, Michelle ;
Randall, Rebecca ;
O'Brien, Mearon ;
Hope, Sophie ;
Gulliver, Amelia ;
Forbes, Owen ;
Morse, Alyssa R. ;
Griffiths, Kathleen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2018, 27 (04) :1219-1229
[6]   Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda [J].
Boote, J ;
Telford, R ;
Cooper, C .
HEALTH POLICY, 2002, 61 (02) :213-236
[7]   Scales of Practices and Outcomes for Community-Engaged Research [J].
Boursaw, Blake ;
Oetzel, John G. ;
Dickson, Elizabeth ;
Thein, Thomas S. ;
Sanchez-Youngman, Shannon ;
Pena, Juan ;
Parker, Myra ;
Magarati, Maya ;
Littledeer, Lenora ;
Duran, Bonnie ;
Wallerstein, Nina .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 67 (3-4) :256-270
[8]   A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient and Public Involvement on Service Users, Researchers and Communities [J].
Brett, Jo ;
Staniszewska, Sophie ;
Mockford, Carole ;
Herron-Marx, Sandra ;
Hughes, John ;
Tysall, Colin ;
Suleman, Rashida .
PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2014, 7 (04) :387-395
[9]   Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review [J].
Brett, Jo ;
Staniszewska, Sophie ;
Mockford, Carole ;
Herron-Marx, Sandra ;
Hughes, John ;
Tysall, Colin ;
Suleman, Rashida .
HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2014, 17 (05) :637-650
[10]   Healing and recovering after a suicide attempt: a grounded theory study [J].
Chi, Mei-Ting ;
Long, Ann ;
Jeang, Shiow-Rong ;
Ku, Yan-Chiou ;
Lu, Ti ;
Sun, Fan-Ko .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2014, 23 (11-12) :1751-1759