Comparison of transcranial brain stimulation approaches: prefrontal theta alternating current stimulation enhances working memory performance

被引:6
|
作者
Rauh, Jonas [1 ]
Mueller, Anne S. M. [1 ]
Nolte, Guido [2 ]
Haaf, Moritz [1 ]
Mussmann, Marius [1 ]
Steinmann, Saskia [1 ]
Mulert, Christoph [1 ,3 ]
Leicht, Gregor [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Psychiat Neuroimaging Branch, Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Neurophysiol & Pathophysiol, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Justus Liebig Univ, Ctr Psychiat, Giessen, Germany
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY | 2023年 / 14卷
关键词
working memory; transcranial alternating current stimulation; transcranial direct current stimulation; theta oscillations; dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; high-definition transcranial electrical stimulation; COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; FRONTAL THETA; OSCILLATIONS; CORTEX; HEALTHY; GAMMA; TACS; TDCS; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1140361
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
IntroductionOne of the most important cognitive functions in our everyday life is the working memory (WM). In several neuropsychiatric diseases such as ADHD or schizophrenia WM deficits can be observed, making it an attractive target for non-invasive brain stimulation methods like transcranial electrical stimulation (tES). However, the literature shows rather heterogeneous results of tES effects on WM performance. fMRI meta-analyses have identified a WM network including frontoparietal brain areas such as the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and the posterior parietal cortex (PPC). Neurophysiological studies revealed oscillatory activity in the theta band frequency range to be of crucial functional relevance for WM processes. Based on this, transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) in the theta frequency range targeting DLPFC and PPC in a spatially optimized way might further improve effects of tES on WM performance. MethodsSixteen healthy subjects were stimulated with varying stimulation settings on four different days in a counterbalanced within-subject design. These setups included the application of (1) tACS with a frequency of 5 Hz (theta frequency range) over the left DLPFC and (2) the right superior parietal cortex, (3) transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the DLPFC and (4) a sham stimulation condition during the online performance of a visual delayed-match-to-sample task with varying working memory load. We introduce a procedure to calculate an optimal tES model revealing optimized high-density setups for the present study for 3 cathodes and 1 anode and stimulation currents of 1.5 mA. ResultsA significant interaction effect of stimulation type and load condition on working memory capacity was found. This was reflected by a significant improvement of WM performance in the high load condition during tACS over the left DLPFC compared with sham stimulation, which was not the case for our parietal tACS or tDCS setup. DiscussionWorking memory performance can be improved with optimized high-definition tACS with a frequency of 5 Hz over the left DLPFC. The conception of different mechanisms underlying transcranial electrical stimulation with alternating and direct currents is supported by these results. Patients suffering from working memory impairments due to neuropsychiatric diseases might potentially benefit from this brain stimulation approach.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex enhances working memory
    Yasaman Bagherzadeh
    Anahita Khorrami
    Mohammad Reza Zarrindast
    Seyed Vahid Shariat
    Dimitrios Pantazis
    Experimental Brain Research, 2016, 234 : 1807 - 1818
  • [22] Transcranial alternating current stimulation of frontal theta rhythm has no after-effects to improve working memory
    Pavlov, Y. G.
    Dorogina, O. I.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 131 : S96 - S96
  • [23] Transcranial alternating current stimulation barely enhances working memory in healthy adults: A meta-analysis
    Chuderski, Adam
    Chinta, Suvarna Rekha
    BRAIN RESEARCH, 2024, 1839
  • [24] EFFECTS OF GAMMA TRANSCRANIAL ALTERNATING CURRENT STIMULATION TO THE LEFT DORSOLATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX ON WORKING MEMORY IN SCHIZOPHRENIA PATIENTS
    Papazova, Irina
    Strube, Wolfgang
    Hoffmann, Lina
    Schwippel, Tobias
    Padberg, Frank
    Palm, Ulrich
    Falkai, Peter
    Plewnia, Christian
    Hasan, Alkomiet
    SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2020, 46 : S251 - S252
  • [25] Working memory after and during 6 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation
    Pavlov, Y.
    Kasanov, D.
    Dorogina, O.
    EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 64 : S487 - S488
  • [26] Improving working memory: Exploring the effect of transcranial random noise stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
    Mulquiney, Paul G.
    Hoy, Kate E.
    Daskalakis, Zafiris J.
    Fitzgerald, Paul B.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 122 (12) : 2384 - 2389
  • [27] Enhancement of Visuospatial Working Memory by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Prefrontal and Parietal Cortices
    Tabrizi, Yousef Moghadas
    Kateb, Meysam Yavari
    Shahrbanian, Shahnaz
    BASIC AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 14 (01) : 129 - 136
  • [28] Effects of prefrontal anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on working -memory and reaction time
    Verissimo, Ines S.
    Barradas, Isabel M.
    Santos, Tiago T.
    Miranda, Pedro C.
    Ferreira, Hugo A.
    2016 38TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2016, : 1790 - 1793
  • [29] The effects of theta transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on fluid intelligence
    Pahor, Anja
    Jausovec, Norbert
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 93 (03) : 322 - 331
  • [30] Entrainment of Brain Oscillations by Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation
    Helfrich, Randolph F.
    Schneider, Till R.
    Rach, Stefan
    Trautmann-Lengsfeld, Sina A.
    Engel, Andreas K.
    Herrmann, Christoph S.
    CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (03) : 333 - 339