Intravoxel incoherent motion predicts positive surgical margins and Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer

被引:2
作者
Meng, Shuang [1 ]
Gan, Wanting [1 ]
Chen, Lihua [1 ]
Wang, Nan [1 ]
Liu, Ailian [1 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Affiliated Hosp 1, 222 Zhongshan Rd, Dalian 116011, Peoples R China
来源
RADIOLOGIA MEDICA | 2023年 / 128卷 / 06期
关键词
Prostate cancer; Positive surgical margins; Gleason score upgrading; MRI; APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; BIOPSY; PATHOLOGY; TISSUE; SERIES; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s11547-023-01645-2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BackgroundWhether Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) can be used as a predictive tool of positive surgical margins (PSMs) and Gleason score (GS) upgrading in prostate cancer (PCa) patients after radical prostatectomy (RP) still remains unclear. The aim of this study is to explore the ability of IVIM and clinical characteristics to predict PSMs and GS upgrading.MethodsA total of 106 PCa patients after RP who underwent pelvic mpMRI (multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging) between January 2016 and December 2021 and met the requirements were retrospectively included in our study. IVIM parameters were obtained using GE Functool post-processing software. Logistic regression models were fitted to confirm the predictive risk factor of PSMs and GS upgrading. The area under the curve and fourfold contingency table were used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of IVIM and clinical parameters.ResultsMultivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that percent of positive cores, apparent diffusion coefficient and molecular diffusion coefficient (D) were independent predictors of PSMs (Odds Ratio (OR) were 6.07, 3.62 and 3.16, respectively), Biopsy GS and pseudodiffusion coefficient (D*) were independent predictors of GS upgrading (OR were 0.563 and 7.15, respectively). The fourfold contingency table suggested that combined diagnosis increased the ability of predicting PSMs but had no advantage in predicting GS upgrading except the sensitivity from 57.14 to 91.43%.ConclusionsIVIM showed good performance in predicting PSMs and GS upgrading. Combining IVIM and clinical factors enhanced the performance of predicting PSMs, which may contribute to clinical diagnosis and treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:668 / 678
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome
    Felts de la Roca, Ricardo L. R.
    da Cunha, Isabela Werneck
    Bezerra, Stephania Martins
    da Fonseca, Francisco Paulo
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2014, 40 (03): : 306 - 315
  • [22] Imaging classification of prostate cancer with extracapsular extension and its impact on positive surgical margins after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Wang, Jun-Guang
    Zhong, Chao
    Zhang, Ke-Cheng
    Chen, Jun-Bo
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [23] Prostate Health Index (phi) and its derivatives predict Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy among patients with low-risk prostate cancer
    Yan, Jia-Qi
    Huang, Da
    Huang, Jing-Yi
    Ruan, Xiao-Hao
    Lin, Xiao-Ling
    Fang, Zu-Jun
    Gao, Yi
    Jiang, Hao-Wen
    Wu, Yi-Shuo
    Na, Rong
    Xu, Dan-Feng
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2022, 24 (04) : 406 - +
  • [24] Preoperative Gleason score, percent of positive prostate biopsies and PSA in predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Acimovic, M.
    Dabic-Stankovic, K.
    Pejcic, T.
    Dzamic, Z.
    Rafailovic, D.
    Hadzi-Djokic, J.
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2013, 18 (04): : 954 - 960
  • [25] Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy
    Galetti, Tommaso Prayer
    Cattaneo, Francesco
    Coati, Irena
    Gardiman, Marina
    UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2014, 81 (01) : 16 - 24
  • [26] Low serum testosterone predicts upgrading and upstaging of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy
    Gao, Yuan
    Jiang, Chen-Yi
    Mao, Shi-Kui
    Cui, Di
    Hao, Kui-Yuan
    Zhao, Wei
    Jiang, Qi
    Ruan, Yuan
    Xia, Shu-Jie
    Han, Bang-Min
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2016, 18 (04) : 639 - 643
  • [27] Epigenetic signature of Gleason score and prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Geybels, Milan S.
    Wright, Jonathan L.
    Bibikova, Marina
    Klotzle, Brandy
    Fan, Jian-Bing
    Zhao, Shanshan
    Feng, Ziding
    Ostrander, Elaine A.
    Lin, Daniel W.
    Nelson, Peter S.
    Stanford, Janet L.
    CLINICAL EPIGENETICS, 2016, 8
  • [28] Predictors of Gleason Grading Group Upgrading in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients From Transperineal Biopsy After Radical Prostatectomy
    Zhou, Ling
    Xu, Li-long
    Zheng, Lin-lin
    Chen, Chao
    Xu, Li
    Zeng, Ji-ling
    Li, Shi-yan
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2024, 31 (07) : 2838 - 2847
  • [29] Assessment of positive surgical margins in the management of patients after radical prostatectomy for pT2 prostate cancer
    Saier, E.
    Pinar, U.
    De la Taille, A.
    Irani, J.
    Salomon, L.
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2022, 32 (05): : 354 - 362
  • [30] Predictive Factors for Positive Surgical Margins in Patients With Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, Lijin
    Zhao, Hu
    Wu, Bin
    Zha, Zhenlei
    Yuan, Jun
    Feng, Yejun
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 10