共 50 条
A cluster-randomized trial comparing two SWITCH implementation support strategies for school wellness intervention effectiveness
被引:5
|作者:
Rosenkranz, Richard R.
[1
]
Dixon, Philip M.
[2
]
Dzewaltowski, David A.
[3
]
McLoughlin, Gabriella M.
[4
,5
]
Lee, Joey A.
[6
]
Chen, Senlin
[7
]
Vazou, Spyridoula
[7
]
Lanningham-Foster, Lorraine M.
[8
]
Gentile, Doug A.
[9
]
Welk, Gregory J.
[7
]
机构:
[1] Kansas State Univ, Dept Food Nutr Dietet & Hlth, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Stat, Snedecor Hall, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[3] Univ Nebraska, Dept Hlth Promot, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
[4] Washington Univ St Louis, Implementat Sci Ctr Canc Control & Prevent, Res Ctr, Brown Sch, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[5] Washington Univ St Louis, Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg,Div Publ Hlth Sci, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[6] Univ Colorado Colorado Springs, Dept Hlth Sci, Colorado Springs, CO 80918 USA
[7] Iowa State Univ, Dept Kinesiol, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[8] Iowa State Univ, Dept Food Sci & Human Nutr, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[9] Iowa State Univ, Dept Psychol, Ames, IA 50011 USA
基金:
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词:
Children;
Implementation science;
Obesity prevention;
Physical activity;
School health;
OBESITY PREVENTION;
PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jshs.2021.12.001
中图分类号:
F [经济];
学科分类号:
02 ;
摘要:
Background: The School Wellness Integration Targeting Child Health (SWITCH) intervention has demonstrated feasibility as an implementation approach to help schools facilitate changes in students' physical activity (PA), sedentary screen time (SST), and dietary intake (DI). This study evaluated the comparative effectiveness of enhanced (individualized) implementation and standard (group-based) implementation.Methods: Twenty-two Iowa elementary schools participated, with each receiving standardized training (wellness conference and webinars). Schools were matched within region and randomized to receive either individualized or group implementation support. The PA, SST, and DI out-comes of 1097 students were assessed at pre-and post-intervention periods using the Youth Activity Profile. Linear mixed models evaluated dif-ferential change in outcomes by condition, for comparative effectiveness, and by gender.Results: Both implementation conditions led to significant improvements in PA and SST over time (p < 0.01), but DI did not improve commen-surately (p value range: 0.02-0.05). There were no differential changes between the group and individualized conditions for PA (p = 0.51), SST (p = 0.19), or DI (p = 0.73). There were no differential effects by gender (i.e., non-significant condition-by-gender interactions) for PA (pfor interac-tion = 0.86), SST (pfor interaction = 0.46), or DI (pfor interaction = 0.15). Effect sizes for both conditions equated to approximately 6 min more PA per day and approximately 3 min less sedentary time.Conclusion: The observed lack of difference in outcomes suggests that group implementation of SWITCH is equally effective as individualized implementation for building capacity in school wellness programming. Similarly, the lack of interaction by gender suggests that SWITCH can be beneficial for both boys and girls. Additional research is needed to understand the school-level factors that influence implementation (and out-comes) of SWITCH.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 96
页数:10
相关论文