Land use and adaptive governance under climate change: Analysis of four cases in pastoral areas of China

被引:3
作者
Zhang, Qian [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Social Sci, Inst Sociol, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
adaptive governance; mobility; polycentric institutions; grassland conservation; coping strategies; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.3389/fenvs.2023.922417
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Under the impact of climate change, pastoral areas of China have experienced increasing frequency and intensity of extreme events, which has brought more challenges to pastoralists' livelihood. Adaptive governance refers to increasing resilience through collaborative, flexible, and learning-oriented management on different scales to form a set of political, social, economic, and administrative systems for the development, management, and allocation of resources. As such, it provides a useful framework and benchmark for enhancing adaptive capacity. However, how to implement adaptive governance in practice is still an unresolved problem. Under the current property regime, which individualized grassland use rights with wire fences built to demarcate boundaries, pastoralists of different places have tried to increase their adaptability to reduce the loss caused by disasters. Some succeeded, but some failed. Based on household surveys and an comparative analysis of four cases in pastoral areas of China, this article presents their climate change risk and changes in land use arrangements, explores the reasons for their different adaptability by comparing their coping strategies with the adaptive governance features, and finally illustrates the challenges influencing the application of adaptive governance at the local level.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Agrawal A, 2010, NEW FRONT SOC POLICY, P173
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, WORKING GROUP 2 CONT
[3]  
Barros V. R., 2014, Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
[4]   The determinants of vulnerability and adaptive capacity at the national level and the implications for adaptation [J].
Brooks, N ;
Adger, WN ;
Kelly, PM .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2005, 15 (02) :151-163
[5]  
Cao G., 2017, RES ECOLOGICAL FUNCT
[6]   Differential Benefits of Multi- and Single-Household Grassland Management Patterns in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau of China [J].
Cao, Jian-Jun ;
Xiong, You-Cai ;
Sun, Jing ;
Xiong, Wan-Fang ;
Du, Guo-Zhen .
HUMAN ECOLOGY, 2011, 39 (02) :217-227
[7]  
Chen J., 2007, N EC, V21, P29
[8]   Climate change scenarios for Tibetan Plateau summer precipitation based on canonical correlation analysis [J].
Chen, Xiaoyang ;
You, Qinglong ;
Sielmann, Frank ;
Ruan, Neng .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATOLOGY, 2017, 37 (03) :1310-1321
[9]  
[崔鹏 Cui Peng], 2017, [中国科学院院刊, Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences], V32, P985
[10]  
Cumming GS, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11