PhD students' relatedness, motivation, and well-being with multiple supervisors

被引:5
作者
Khosa, Amrinder [1 ]
Wilkin, Carla [2 ]
Burch, Steven [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Tasmanian Sch Business & Econ, Launceston, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Dept Accounting, Melbourne, Australia
[3] Univ Tasmania, Tasmanian Sch Business & Econ, Burnie, Australia
关键词
PhD student-supervisor relationship; relatedness; self-determination theory; self-disclosure; social penetration theory; SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY; DOCTORAL SUPERVISION; DISCLOSURE; ATTRIBUTION; HEALTH; EXPERIENCES; RECIPROCITY; CANDIDATES; CHALLENGES; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1080/09639284.2023.2179889
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
While the quality and nature of a PhD students' relationship with their supervisors is widely regarded as pivotal for successfully completing their studies, the increasing use of multiple supervisors may challenge this relationship. This is the first study to use interviews with students and supervisors to explore students' motivation in such supervisory arrangements. Our study is framed by Self-Determination Theory (SDT) as a means for understanding factors that enable (or inhibit) individuals' motivation to learn, and Social Penetration Theory (SPT) for its perspectives on the development of relationships. Findings show that students' self-disclosure fosters relatedness and enhances autonomy and competence, with motivation and well-being as a function of their relational needs being satisfied. As such, complementarities between SDT and SPT provide more nuanced insights into the influence of relatedness on student motivation and well-being.
引用
收藏
页码:131 / 163
页数:33
相关论文
共 89 条
  • [1] Altman Irwin, 1973, Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships
  • [2] Instructor Care and Consideration toward Students-What Accounting Students Report: A Research Note
    Bandura, Randall
    Lyons, Paul
    [J]. ACCOUNTING EDUCATION, 2012, 21 (05) : 515 - 527
  • [3] Dissecting doctoral advising: a comparison of students' experiences across disciplines
    Barnes, Benita J.
    Williams, Elizabeth A.
    Stassen, Martha L. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FURTHER AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2012, 36 (03) : 309 - 331
  • [4] Psychological health of doctoral candidates, study-related challenges and perceived performance
    Barry, K. M.
    Woods, M.
    Warnecke, E.
    Stirling, C.
    Martin, A.
    [J]. HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 37 (03) : 468 - 483
  • [5] Content and context in knowledge production: a critical review of doctoral supervision literature
    Bastalich, Wendy
    [J]. STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2017, 42 (07) : 1145 - 1157
  • [6] Supervisory styles: a contingency framework
    Boehe, Dirk Michael
    [J]. STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2016, 41 (03) : 399 - 414
  • [7] 'A starting point for your journey, not a map': Nikki Hayfield in conversation with Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke about thematic analysis
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    Hayfield, Nikki
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 19 (02) : 424 - 445
  • [8] Brooks R.L., 2007, European Journal of Education, V42, P351
  • [9] Breaking Them in or Eliciting Their Best? Reframing Socialization around Newcomers' Authentic Self-expression
    Cable, Daniel M.
    Gino, Francesca
    Staats, Bradley R.
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2013, 58 (01) : 1 - 36
  • [10] Carpenter A., 2016, INT ENCYCL INTERPERS, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1002/9781118540190.WBEIC0160, 10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic160, DOI 10.1002/9781118540190.WBEIC160]