Manufacturing 3D Biomimetic Tissue: A Strategy Involving the Integration of Electrospun Nanofibers with a 3D-Printed Framework for Enhanced Tissue Regeneration

被引:8
作者
Randhawa, Aayushi [1 ,2 ]
Dutta, Sayan Deb [1 ,3 ]
Ganguly, Keya [1 ]
Patil, Tejal V. [1 ,2 ]
Lim, Ki-Taek [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Kangwon Natl Univ, Dept Biosyst Engn, Chunchon 24341, South Korea
[2] Kangwon Natl Univ, Interdisciplinary Program Smart Agr, Chunchon 24341, South Korea
[3] Kangwon Natl Univ, Inst Forest Sci, Chunchon 24341, Gangwon Do, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
3D printing; biomimetic structures; combined technique; electrospinning; tissue engineering; ELECTROHYDRODYNAMIC ENHANCEMENT; FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS; HIGH-RESOLUTION; POLYMER MELTS; IN-VITRO; SCAFFOLD; FABRICATION; FIBERS; CELLS; STEREOLITHOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1002/smll.202309269
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
3D printing and electrospinning are versatile techniques employed to produce 3D structures, such as scaffolds and ultrathin fibers, facilitating the creation of a cellular microenvironment in vitro. These two approaches operate on distinct working principles and utilize different polymeric materials to generate the desired structure. This review provides an extensive overview of these techniques and their potential roles in biomedical applications. Despite their potential role in fabricating complex structures, each technique has its own limitations. Electrospun fibers may have ambiguous geometry, while 3D-printed constructs may exhibit poor resolution with limited mechanical complexity. Consequently, the integration of electrospinning and 3D-printing methods may be explored to maximize the benefits and overcome the individual limitations of these techniques. This review highlights recent advancements in combined techniques for generating structures with controlled porosities on the micro-nano scale, leading to improved mechanical structural integrity. Collectively, these techniques also allow the fabrication of nature-inspired structures, contributing to a paradigm shift in research and technology. Finally, the review concludes by examining the advantages, disadvantages, and future outlooks of existing technologies in addressing challenges and exploring potential opportunities. In tissue engineering, biomimetic structure refers to the emulation of natural architecture. Methods like 3D printing and electrospinning enable the fabrication of structures resembling the native structure. These biomimetic structures confer different physical, chemical, and biological signals to the cells that aid various cellular processes such as proliferation and differentiation which help the damaged tissue to heal and regenerate. image
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Can 3D-Printed Bioactive Glasses Be the Future of Bone Tissue Engineering?
    Dukle, Amey
    Murugan, Dhanashree
    Nathanael, Arputharaj Joseph
    Rangasamy, Loganathan
    Oh, Tae-Hwan
    POLYMERS, 2022, 14 (08)
  • [42] Production of 3D-Printed Tympanic Membrane Scaffolds as a Tissue Engineering Application
    Ilhan, Elif
    Ulag, Songul
    Sahin, Ali
    Ekren, Nazmi
    Kilic, Osman
    Oktar, Faik Nuzhet
    Gunduz, Oguzhan
    BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING (IWBBIO 2020), 2020, 12108 : 175 - 184
  • [43] 3D-printed nanocomposite scaffolds with tunable magnesium ionic microenvironment induce in situ bone tissue regeneration
    Shen, Jie
    Wang, Wenhao
    Zhai, Xinyun
    Chen, Bo
    Qiao, Wei
    Li, Wan
    Li, Penghui
    Zhao, Ying
    Meng, Yuan
    Qian, Shi
    Liu, Xuanyong
    Chu, Paul K.
    Yeung, Kelvin W. K.
    APPLIED MATERIALS TODAY, 2019, 16 : 493 - 507
  • [44] On the progress of 3D-printed hydrogels for tissue engineering
    Rigoberto C. Advincula
    John Ryan C. Dizon
    Eugene B. Caldona
    Robert Andrew Viers
    Francis Dave C. Siacor
    Reymark D. Maalihan
    Alejandro H. Espera
    MRS Communications, 2021, 11 : 539 - 553
  • [45] On the progress of 3D-printed hydrogels for tissue engineering
    Advincula, Rigoberto C.
    Dizon, John Ryan C.
    Caldona, Eugene B.
    Viers, Robert Andrew
    Siacor, Francis Dave C.
    Maalihan, Reymark D.
    Espera, Alejandro H., Jr.
    MRS COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 11 (05) : 539 - 553
  • [46] Cellulose-in-cellulose 3D-printed bioaerogels for bone tissue engineering
    Iglesias-Mejuto, Ana
    Malandain, Nanthilde
    Ferreira-Goncalves, Tania
    Ardao, Ines
    Reis, Catarina Pinto
    Laromaine, Anna
    Roig, Anna
    Garcia-Gonzalez, Carlos A.
    CELLULOSE, 2024, 31 (01) : 515 - 534
  • [47] 3D Printed scaffolds with hierarchical biomimetic structure for osteochondral regeneration
    Zhou, Xuan
    Esworthy, Timothy
    Lee, Se-Jun
    Miao, Shida
    Cui, Haitao
    Plesiniak, Michael
    Fenniri, Hicham
    Webster, Thomas
    Rao, Raj D.
    Zhang, Lijie Grace
    NANOMEDICINE-NANOTECHNOLOGY BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2019, 19 (58-70) : 58 - 70
  • [48] Relevance of PEG in PLA-based blends for tissue engineering 3D-printed scaffolds
    Serra, Tiziano
    Ortiz-Hernandez, Monica
    Engel, Elisabeth
    Planell, Josep A.
    Navarro, Melba
    MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING C-MATERIALS FOR BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2014, 38 : 55 - 62
  • [49] 3D Printing for Soft Tissue Regeneration and Applications in Medicine
    Pantermehl, Sven
    Emmert, Steffen
    Foth, Aenne
    Grabow, Niels
    Alkildani, Said
    Bader, Rainer
    Barbeck, Mike
    Jung, Ole
    BIOMEDICINES, 2021, 9 (04)
  • [50] 3D printed tissue engineered model for bone invasion of oral cancer
    Almela, Thafar
    Al-Sahaf, Sarmad
    Brook, Ian M.
    Khoshroo, Kimia
    Rasoulianboroujeni, Morteza
    Fahimipour, Farahnaz
    Tahriri, Mohammadreza
    Dashtimoghadam, Erfan
    Bolt, Robert
    Tayebi, Lobat
    Moharamzadeh, Keyvan
    TISSUE & CELL, 2018, 52 : 71 - 77