Visual Acuity Examination Methodology in Keratoconus

被引:4
作者
Nandzik, Magdalena [1 ]
Wylegala, Edward [1 ]
Wylegala, Adam [1 ]
Szkodny, Dominika [1 ]
Roszkowska, Anna Maria [2 ]
Wroblewska-Czajka, Ewa [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Silesia, Dist Railway Hosp Katowice, Dept Ophthalmol, PL-40760 Katowice, Poland
[2] Univ Messina, Dept Biomed Sci, Ophthalmol Clin, I-98100 Messina, Italy
关键词
keratoconus; logMAR conversion; visual acuity; Snellen chart; ETDRS chart; RING SEGMENT IMPLANTATION; CROSS-LINKING; TOPOGRAPHIC OUTCOMES; SNELLEN; CHART; LOGMAR; ETDRS; STANDARD;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12247620
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Visual acuity is one of the most important parameters for evaluating the vision of patients with keratoconus. This study reviewed 295 articles related to keratoconus published between 2017 and 2022 in which visual acuity was one of the parameters measured. The methodology of visual acuity testing in studies on keratoconus was thoroughly analyzed. The analysis showed that the most commonly indicated chart for testing visual acuity papers on keratoconus is the Snellen chart. It was shown that in 150 out of 295 articles, the authors do not describe the methodology for testing visual acuity. What is more, it was also shown that in 68 of the 295 articles which were analyzed, a procedure for converting visual acuity tested with a Snellen chart into a logMAR scale was used. In this review, we discuss the validity and reliability of such conversions. In particular, we show that insufficient description of visual acuity testing methodology and lack of information on the conversion of visual acuity results into the logMAR scale may contribute to the misinterpretation of visual acuity test results.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Amanzadeh K, 2017, J CURR OPHTHALMOL, V29, P189, DOI 10.1016/j.joco.2016.10.004
[2]   Long-Term Visual, Refractive and Topographic Outcomes of "Epi-off" Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking in Pediatric Keratoconus: Standard versus Accelerated Protocol [J].
Amer, Ibrahim ;
Elaskary, Abdelhakeem ;
Mostafa, Ali ;
Hazem, Hazem A. ;
Omar, Ahmed ;
Abdou, Ahmed .
CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 14 :3747-3754
[3]  
Aneeq Ansari Muhammad Sufyan, 2021, J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad, V33, P289
[4]   Management of cataract in keratoconus: early visual outcomes of different treatment modalities [J].
Arej, Nicolas ;
Chanbour, Wassef ;
Zaarour, Karen ;
Amro, Mazen ;
El-Rami, Hala ;
Harb, Fadi ;
Jarade, Elias .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 12 (10) :1654-1658
[5]  
Asimellis G., 2022, Keratoconus
[6]  
Azzam D., 2021, StatPearls
[7]  
BAILEY IL, 1976, AM J OPTOM PHYS OPT, V53, P740
[8]   Comparison of Snellen Visual Acuity Measurements in Retinal Clinical Practice to Electronic ETDRS Protocol Visual Acuity Assessment [J].
Baker, Carl W. ;
Josic, Kristin ;
Maguire, Maureen G. ;
Jampol, Lee M. ;
Martin, Daniel F. ;
Rofagha, Soraya ;
Sun, Jennifer K. ;
DRCR Retina Network .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 130 (05) :533-541
[9]   Refractive, Topographic, and Aberrometric Results at 2-Year Follow-Up for Accelerated Corneal Cross-Link for Progressive Keratoconus [J].
Bozkurt, Ercument ;
Ozgurhan, Engin Bilge ;
Akcay, Betul Ilkay Sezgin ;
Kurt, Tugba ;
Yildirim, Yusuf ;
Gunaydin, Zehra Karaagac ;
Demirok, Ahmet .
JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 2017
[10]   Refractive outcome of keratoconus treated by big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in pediatric patients: two-year follow-up comparison between mechanical trephine and femtosecond laser assisted techniques [J].
Buzzonetti, Luca ;
Petrocelli, Gianni ;
Valente, Paola ;
Petroni, Sergio ;
Parrilla, Rosa ;
Larossi, Giancarlo .
EYE AND VISION, 2019, 6 (1)