Regional versus systemic dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to lidocaine for intravenous regional anaesthesia in healthy volunteers: a randomized crossover study

被引:0
|
作者
Liao, Xincheng [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Jie [3 ]
Shu, Xinru [1 ]
Hong, Shisen [1 ]
Yao, Yusheng [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Li, Hao [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Fujian Prov Hosp, Shengli Clin Med Coll, Dept Anesthesiol, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Anesthesiol, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Peoples Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Fujian Prov Key Lab Crit Care Med, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Fujian Med Univ, Fujian Prov Hosp, Shengli Clin Med Coll, 134 Dongjie, Fuzhou 350001, Peoples R China
关键词
Crossover study; dexmedetomidine; intravenous regional anesthesia; lidocaine; TOURNIQUET; SEDATION; EFFICACY; FOREARM; PAIN;
D O I
10.1080/07853890.2023.2300663
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Dexmedetomidine enhances the quality and duration of lidocaine intravenous regional anaesthesia (IVRA). However, the two administration routes have not been directly compared regarding effects on tourniquet tolerance time with lidocaine IVRA. Additionally, it remains unclear whether the prolonged tourniquet tolerance stems from the direct peripheral action of dexmedetomidine or indirect systemic analgesic effects.Methods: We conducted forearm IVRA in 12 healthy volunteers using a crossover design on two separate study days. One day, the systemic dexmedetomidine group received an intravenous infusion of 0.5 mu g/kg dexmedetomidine (20 mL) in one arm, followed by 0.5% lidocaine (25 mL) forearm IVRA in the contralateral arm. On the other day, the regional dexmedetomidine group received an intravenous 0.9% saline infusion (20 mL) in one arm, followed by combined 0.5% lidocaine (25 mL) and 0.5 mu g/kg dexmedetomidine forearm IVRA in the opposite arm. After a two-week washout period, participants crossed over to receive the alternate treatment. The primary outcome was tourniquet tolerance time, from initiating IVRA until the patient-reported tourniquet pain numerical rating scale exceeded three.Results: The tourniquet tolerance time was longer with regional versus systemic dexmedetomidine (36.9 +/- 7.6 min vs 23.3 +/- 6.2 min, respectively), with a 13.6 min mean difference (95% CI: 10.8 to 16.4 min, p < 0.001). Regional dexmedetomidine also hastened sensory onset and extended sensory recovery compared to systemic administration. Delayed sedation after tourniquet release occurred in 5 of 12 subjects receiving regional dexmedetomidine.Conclusion: The addition of regional dexmedetomidine to lidocaine prolonged tourniquet tolerance time in forearm IVRA to a greater extent compared to systemic dexmedetomidine in healthy volunteers.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative Study of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine and Buprenorphine as Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Spinal Anaesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trail
    Bojaraaj, Kannan
    Vijayaragavan, S.
    Senthilkumar, S.
    Mohammed, M. A.
    Khan, Thaiyub
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC STUDY, 2016, 4 (01) : 246 - 251
  • [42] Lidocaine priming reduces tourniquet pain during intravenous regional anesthesia:: A preliminary study
    Estèbe, JP
    Gentili, ME
    Langlois, G
    Mouilleron, P
    Bernard, F
    Ecoffey, C
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2003, 28 (02) : 120 - 123
  • [43] Comparison between 0.5 mu g/kg Dexmedetomidine with 0.5% Lignocaine and 0.5% Lignocaine Alone in Intravenous Regional Anesthesia for Forearm Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Study
    Balamurugan, M.
    Shanmugasundaram, M.
    Kavitha, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC STUDY, 2016, 4 (03) : 1 - 5
  • [44] Effects of Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Versus Lidocaine on Postoperative Pain, Analgesic Consumption and Functional Recovery After Abdominal Gynecological Surgery: A Randomized Placebo-controlled Double Blind Study
    Rekatsina, Martina
    Theodosopoulou, Polyxeni
    Staikou, Chryssoula
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2021, 24 (07) : E997 - E1006
  • [45] WALANT versus intravenous regional anesthesia for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized clinical trial
    Okamura, Aldo
    De Moraes, Vinicius Ynoe
    Fernandes, Marcela
    Raduan-Neto, Jorge
    Belloti, Joao Carlos
    SAO PAULO MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 139 (06): : 576 - 582
  • [46] Study of 0.5% Lidocaine Alone and Combination of 0.25% Lidocaine with Fentanyl and Vecuronium in Intravenous Regional Anesthesia for Upper Limb Surgeries
    Santhosh, M. C. B.
    Pai, Rohini Bhat
    Roopa, S.
    Rao, Raghavendra P.
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2013, 63 (03): : 254 - 257
  • [47] Systemic Ropivacaine Diminishes Pain Sensitization Processes: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study in Healthy Volunteers
    Haller Y.
    Gantenbein A.R.
    Willimann P.
    Spahn D.R.
    Maurer K.
    Pain and Therapy, 2014, 3 (1) : 45 - 58
  • [48] Comparison of the effects and disposition kinetics of articaine and lidocaine in 20 patients undergoing intravenous regional anaesthesia during day case surgery
    Simon, MAM
    Vree, TB
    Gielen, MJM
    Booij, LHDJ
    PHARMACY WORLD & SCIENCE, 1998, 20 (02): : 88 - 92
  • [49] Efficacy and Safety of Adding Ketamine to Lidocaine in Intravenous Regional Anesthesia: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Du, Jun
    Li, Chan
    Zhang, Wenwen
    Lu, Xing
    Xia, Yanfei
    Qin, Xiarong
    JOURNAL OF PERIANESTHESIA NURSING, 2025, 40 (01) : 195 - 204.e5
  • [50] The analgesic efficacy of forearm versus upper arm intravenous regional anesthesia (Bier's block): A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial
    Nijs, Kristof
    Lismont, Andre
    De Wachter, Gerrit
    Broux, Victoria
    Callebaut, Ina
    Ory, Jean-Paul
    Jalil, Hassanin
    Poelaert, Jan
    Van de Velde, Marc
    Stessel, Bjorn
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2021, 73