Regional versus systemic dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to lidocaine for intravenous regional anaesthesia in healthy volunteers: a randomized crossover study

被引:0
|
作者
Liao, Xincheng [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Jie [3 ]
Shu, Xinru [1 ]
Hong, Shisen [1 ]
Yao, Yusheng [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Li, Hao [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Fujian Prov Hosp, Shengli Clin Med Coll, Dept Anesthesiol, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Anesthesiol, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Peoples Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Fujian Prov Key Lab Crit Care Med, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Fujian Med Univ, Fujian Prov Hosp, Shengli Clin Med Coll, 134 Dongjie, Fuzhou 350001, Peoples R China
关键词
Crossover study; dexmedetomidine; intravenous regional anesthesia; lidocaine; TOURNIQUET; SEDATION; EFFICACY; FOREARM; PAIN;
D O I
10.1080/07853890.2023.2300663
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Dexmedetomidine enhances the quality and duration of lidocaine intravenous regional anaesthesia (IVRA). However, the two administration routes have not been directly compared regarding effects on tourniquet tolerance time with lidocaine IVRA. Additionally, it remains unclear whether the prolonged tourniquet tolerance stems from the direct peripheral action of dexmedetomidine or indirect systemic analgesic effects.Methods: We conducted forearm IVRA in 12 healthy volunteers using a crossover design on two separate study days. One day, the systemic dexmedetomidine group received an intravenous infusion of 0.5 mu g/kg dexmedetomidine (20 mL) in one arm, followed by 0.5% lidocaine (25 mL) forearm IVRA in the contralateral arm. On the other day, the regional dexmedetomidine group received an intravenous 0.9% saline infusion (20 mL) in one arm, followed by combined 0.5% lidocaine (25 mL) and 0.5 mu g/kg dexmedetomidine forearm IVRA in the opposite arm. After a two-week washout period, participants crossed over to receive the alternate treatment. The primary outcome was tourniquet tolerance time, from initiating IVRA until the patient-reported tourniquet pain numerical rating scale exceeded three.Results: The tourniquet tolerance time was longer with regional versus systemic dexmedetomidine (36.9 +/- 7.6 min vs 23.3 +/- 6.2 min, respectively), with a 13.6 min mean difference (95% CI: 10.8 to 16.4 min, p < 0.001). Regional dexmedetomidine also hastened sensory onset and extended sensory recovery compared to systemic administration. Delayed sedation after tourniquet release occurred in 5 of 12 subjects receiving regional dexmedetomidine.Conclusion: The addition of regional dexmedetomidine to lidocaine prolonged tourniquet tolerance time in forearm IVRA to a greater extent compared to systemic dexmedetomidine in healthy volunteers.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of the hemodynamic response of dexmedetomidine versus additional intravenous lidocaine with propofol during tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled study
    Seangrung, Rattaphol
    Pasutharnchat, Koravee
    Injampa, Subundit
    Kumdang, Sirima
    Komonhirun, Rojnarin
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [22] Comparison of the hemodynamic response of dexmedetomidine versus additional intravenous lidocaine with propofol during tracheal intubation: a randomized controlled study
    Rattaphol Seangrung
    Koravee Pasutharnchat
    Subundit Injampa
    Sirima Kumdang
    Rojnarin Komonhirun
    BMC Anesthesiology, 21
  • [23] A Comparative Study of Two Different Doses of Dexmedetomidine as Adjunct to Lignocaine in Intravenous Regional Anaesthesia of Upper Limb Surgeries
    Gupta, Abhishek
    Mahobia, Mamta
    Narang, Neeraj
    Mahendra, Rekha
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC STUDY, 2014, 2 (03) : 53 - 62
  • [24] Systemic Intravenous Lidocaine for the Treatment of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Case Report and Literature Review
    Rickard, Joshua P.
    Kish, Troy
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 23 (05) : E1266 - E1269
  • [25] Sequential analysis for median effective dose of Dexmedetomidine in upper limb Lidocaine intravenous regional anesthesia
    Salman, Ossama Hamdy
    Gad, Gad Sayed
    Salem, Ahmed Essam
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 36 (01): : 176 - 183
  • [26] Does the use of ketamine or nitroglycerin as an adjuvant to lidocaine improve the quality of intravenous regional anesthesia?
    Elmetwaly, Khaled Fawzy
    Hegazy, Nasr Abdelmohsen
    Aboelseoud, Abdelkhalek Abdelmonem
    Alshaer, Ahmad Abdullah
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2010, 4 (02) : 55 - 62
  • [27] Intravenous regional anesthesia with 0.5% articaine, 0.5% lidocaine, or 0.5% prilocaine - A double-blind randomized clinical study
    Simon, MAM
    Gielen, MJM
    Alberink, N
    Vree, TB
    vanEgmond, J
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA, 1997, 22 (01) : 29 - 34
  • [28] The effect of intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine versus lidocaine as an analgesic adjuvant to balanced general anesthesia and enhanced recovery after abdominal surgery
    Ibrahim, Fatma Hassan
    Mohamed, Soheir Abbas
    Abd El Hamid, Hadeel Magdy
    Rabie, Amal Hamed
    El Derh, Maha Sadek
    AIN SHAMS JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [29] The effect of intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine versus lidocaine as an analgesic adjuvant to balanced general anesthesia and enhanced recovery after abdominal surgery
    Fatma Hassan Ibrahim
    Soheir Abbas Mohamed
    Hadeel Magdy Abd El Hamid
    Amal Hamed Rabie
    Maha Sadek El Derh
    Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology, 14
  • [30] Comparison of anesthetic effect between 0.375% ropivacaine versus 0.5% lidocaine in forearm intravenous regional anesthesia
    Peng, PWH
    Coleman, MM
    McCartney, CJL
    Krone, S
    Chan, VWS
    Kaszas, Z
    Vucemilo, I
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2002, 27 (06) : 595 - 599