Risk for fetal malformations and unfavorable neonatal outcomes in early-onset gestational diabetes mellitus

被引:3
作者
Yefet, E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jeda, E. [4 ]
Yossef, A. [4 ]
Massalha, M. [4 ,5 ]
Tzur, A. [4 ]
Nachum, Z. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Tzafon Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Poriya, Israel
[2] Holon Womens Hlth Ctr, Clalit Hlth Serv, Afula, Israel
[3] Bar Ilan Univ, Azrieli Fac Med, Safed, Israel
[4] Emek Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Afula, Israel
[5] Rappaport Fac Med, Technion, Haifa, Israel
关键词
Gestational diabetes mellitus; Congenital malformations; Early onset; First trimester; Pregnancy; GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE TEST; CONGENITAL-MALFORMATIONS; HEART-DISEASE; PREGNANCY; HYPERGLYCEMIA; WOMEN; HEMOGLOBIN-A1C; CLASSIFICATION; POPULATION; PREVALENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s40618-023-02238-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundEarly-onset gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is diagnosed before the 24th gestational week. Since early GDM is associated with first trimester hyperglycemia, many clinicians treat these women as having pre-GDM. However, whether early GDM increases the risk for unfavorable pregnancy outcomes and particularly for fetal malformations to a greater extent than late-onset GDM were not studied sufficiently. We aimed to examine the effect of early-onset GDM on unfavorable pregnancy outcomes.MethodsA retrospective cohort study of women with GDM delivering singletons during 2005-2018 was conducted. Women were divided into GDM diagnosed at the first (Trimester1; up to 13.6 weeks; N = 117), the second (Trimester2; up to 23.6 weeks; N = 126), and the third trimester (Trimester3; N = 2334). The primary outcomes were neonatal malformations and a composite of large-for-age newborns, hypoglycemia and hyperbilirubinemia treated with phototherapy. Comparisons were made between early- (Trimester1 + Trimester2-groups) and late-onset GDM (Trimester3-group), and between the three trimesters.ResultsFetal malformations were low and comparable between the trimester1, trimester2, trimester3 groups (2 (1.7%), 3 (2.4%), and 110 (4.7%), respectively). The composite neonatal complications was similar between the groups (68 (58%), 58 (46%), and 1087 (47%), respectively). In early-onset, the rates of neonatal hypoglycemia and shoulder dystocia were higher than in the late-onset GDM group (OR 95% CI 3.5 [2.0-6.1] and 10.3 [2.4-44.6], respectively). Macrosomia was higher in trimester1 compared with trimester2 and trimester3 cohorts (OR 95% CI 5.3 [1.7-16.9] and 2.8 [1.5-5.2], respectively).ConclusionsThe risk for fetal malformations was low and comparable between the first, second and third trimester GDM. Since the risks for macrosomia, shoulder dystocia, and neonatal hypoglycemia are higher in early-onset GDM, these women should undergo strict glycemic control, intensive monitoring, and careful neonatal evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:1181 / 1190
页数:10
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Prenatal detection of fetal anomalies in pregnancies complicated by insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
    Albert, TJ
    Landon, MB
    Wheller, JJ
    Samuels, P
    Cheng, RF
    Gabbe, S
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 174 (05) : 1424 - 1428
  • [2] American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2013, J Ultrasound Med, V32, P1083, DOI 10.7863/ultra.32.6.1083
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2018, Obstet Gynecol, V131, pe49, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002501
  • [4] Trends in prevalence and outcomes of pregnancy in women with pre-existing type I and type II diabetes
    Bell, R.
    Bailey, K.
    Cresswell, T.
    Hawthorne, G.
    Critchley, J.
    Lewis-Barned, N.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2008, 115 (04) : 445 - 452
  • [5] National Diabetes Data Group vs Carpenter-Coustan criteria to diagnose gestational diabetes
    Berggren, Erica K.
    Boggess, Kim A.
    Stuebe, Alison M.
    Funk, Michele Jonsson
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 205 (03)
  • [6] Glucokinase deficit and birthweight: does maternal hyperglycemia always meet fetal needs?
    Bitterman, Olimpia
    Tinto, N.
    Franzese, A.
    Iafusco, F.
    Festa, C.
    Mozzillo, E.
    Napoli, A.
    Iafusco, D.
    [J]. ACTA DIABETOLOGICA, 2018, 55 (12) : 1247 - 1250
  • [7] Bryant SN, 2017, J NEONATAL PERINATAL, V10, P17, DOI DOI 10.3233/NPM-1663
  • [8] Type 2 diabetes in pregnancy: Rates of fetal malformations and level of preconception care
    Callec, R.
    Perdriolle-Galet, E.
    Sery, G. -A.
    Morel, O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 34 (07) : 648 - 649
  • [9] CRITERIA FOR SCREENING-TESTS FOR GESTATIONAL DIABETES
    CARPENTER, MW
    COUSTAN, DR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1982, 144 (07) : 768 - 773
  • [10] Comprehensive Medical Evaluation and Assessment of Comorbidities: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2019
    Cefalu, William T.
    Berg, Erika Gebel
    Saraco, Mindy
    Petersen, Matthew P.
    Uelmen, Sacha
    Robinson, Shamera
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2019, 42 : S34 - S45