Intrapartum ultrasound and mother acceptance: A study with informed consent and questionnaire

被引:3
|
作者
Malvasi, Antonio [1 ,2 ]
Damiani, Gianluca Raffaello [1 ]
Vitagliano, Amerigo [1 ]
Dellino, Miriam [1 ]
Achiron, Reuven [3 ]
Ioannis, Kosmas [4 ]
Vimercati, Antonella [1 ]
Gaetani, Maria [1 ]
Cicinelli, Ettore [1 ]
Vinciguerra, Marina [1 ]
Ricci, Ilaria [1 ]
Tinelli, Andrea [2 ,5 ,6 ]
Baldini, Giorgio Maria [7 ]
Trojano, Giuseppe [8 ,9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bari Aldo Moro, Sch Med, Dept Biomed & Human Oncol Sci DIMO, Unit Obstet & Gynecol 1, I-70124 Bari, Italy
[2] Moscow Inst Phys & Technol, Fac Biol & Med Phys, Phystech BioMed Sch, Lab Human Physiol, Moscow 141701, Russia
[3] Sheba Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Prenatal Diagnost Unit, Tel Hashomer, Israel
[4] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
[5] Veris Delli Ponti Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, I-73020 Scorrano, Lecce, Italy
[6] Vito Fazzi Hosp, Div Expt Endoscop Surg Imaging Technol & Minimally, I-73100 Lecce, Italy
[7] MOMO Fertilife IVF Ctr, I-76011 Bisceglie, Italy
[8] IRCCS Ist Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Dept Maternal, I-70124 Bari, Italy
[9] IRCCS Ist Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Child Gynecol Oncol Unit, I-70124 Bari, Italy
[10] Madonna Grazie Hosp ASM, Hlth, I-75100 Matera, Italy
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY-X | 2023年 / 20卷
关键词
Visual biofeedback; Intrapartum ultrasonography; Informed consent; Labour; Obstetric violence; Discomfort; OCCIPUT POSTERIOR POSITION; HEAD-SYMPHYSIS DISTANCE; FETAL HEAD; TRANSPERINEAL ULTRASOUND; LABOR; SONOGRAPHY; EPISIOTOMY; OBSTETRICS; DIAGNOSE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100246
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction: Intrapartum ultrasound (IU) is used in the delivery ward; even if IU monitors the labouring women, it could be perceived as a discomfort and even as an" obstetric violence", because it is a young technique, not often well "accepted". A group of clinicians aimed at obtain an informed consent from patients, prior to perform a translabial ultrasound (TU). The aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptance of both translabial and transabdominal IU. Methods: In this study, performed at the University Hospital of Bari (Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology), were enrolled 103 patients in the first or second stage of labor in singleton cephalic presentation. A statistical frequency and an association analysis were performed. As a significant result, we consider the peace of mind/ satisfaction and the" obstetric violence". IU was performed both transabdominal and translabial to determine the presentation, head positions, angle of progression and head perineum distance. During the first and second stage of labor, the ASIUG questionnaires (Apulia study intrapartum ultrasonography group) were administered. Results: 74 (71, 84%) patients underwent IU and 29 had a vaginal examination (28, 15%). Significant less "violence" has been experienced with a IU (73 out 74/98, 65%) and only one person (1 /1, 35%) recorded that. On the contrary, 10 patients (10/29) perceived that "violence" (34, 48%) while 19 (65, 52%) did not respond on a similar way, after a vaginal examination (VE). More patients felt satisfaction (71 out 74/95, 95%) with the use of IU and only 3 (3/4, 05%) felt unease. A different picture was evident in the vaginal examination group. Only 17 patients (17 out 29/58, 62%) felt comfort while 12 (41, 38%) felt unease. Conclusions: In our study, IU use is well accepted by most of patients, because it could reassure women about their fetal condition. Moreover, they can see the fetus on the screen, while the obstetrician is performing the US and this is important for a visual feedback, in comparison with the classical VE.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Simple two-dimensional ultrasound technique to assess intrapartum cervical dilatation: a pilot study
    Hassan, W. A.
    Eggebo, T. M.
    Ferguson, M.
    Lees, C.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 41 (04) : 413 - 418
  • [22] Would you like to participate in this trial? The practice of informed consent in intrapartum research in the last 30 years
    Widmer, Mariana
    Bonet, Mercedes
    Betran, Ana Pilar
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (01):
  • [23] Informed consent and medical ordeal: a qualitative study
    Little, M.
    Jordens, C. F. C.
    McGrath, C.
    Montgomery, K.
    Lipworth, W.
    Kerridge, I.
    INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2008, 38 (08) : 624 - 628
  • [24] INFORMED CONSENT IN THE HUMANIZATION OF THE CESAREAN: A PRELIMINARY STUDY
    Castano Molina, Ma Angeles
    Carrillo Navarro, Francisco
    Pastor, Luis Miguel
    CUADERNOS DE BIOETICA, 2016, 27 (90): : 249 - 254
  • [25] Adolescents, informed consent and confidentiality: A case study
    Keshavarz, R
    MOUNT SINAI JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 72 (04): : 232 - 235
  • [26] The use of intrapartum ultrasound in operative vaginal birth: a retrospective cohort study
    Skinner, Sasha M.
    Neil, Peter
    Hodges, Ryan J.
    Murray, Nadine M.
    Mol, Ben W.
    Rolnik, Daniel L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2024, 6 (04)
  • [27] Intrapartum Ultrasound in Maternal Lateral Position. A Prospective Observational Study
    Cuerva, Marcos Javier
    Rodriguez, Elena
    Lopez, Francisco
    Bartha, Jose Luis
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 49 (09)
  • [28] Informed consent in minor and intermediate pediatric elective surgery: results of an in-house questionnaire
    Stefani, Bianca
    Codrich, Daniela
    Caputo, Maria Rita
    Guida, Edoardo
    Scarpa, Maria-Grazia
    Boscarelli, Alessandro
    Schleef, Juergen
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 10
  • [29] The Informed Consent: A Study of the Efficacy of Informed Consents and the Associated Role of Language Barriers
    Clark, Steven
    Mangram, Alicia
    Ernest, Dunn
    Lebron, Ricardo
    Peralta, Lauren
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2011, 68 (02) : 143 - 147
  • [30] Informed consent procedures in patients with an acute inability to provide informed consent: Policy and practice in the CENTER-TBI study
    van Wijk, Roel P. J.
    van Dijck, Jeroen T. J. M.
    Timmers, Marjolein
    van Veen, Ernest
    Citerio, Giuseppe
    Lingsma, Hester F.
    Maas, Andrew I. R.
    Menon, David K.
    Peul, Wilco C.
    Stocchetti, Nino
    Kompanje, Erwin J. O.
    Akerlund, Cecilia
    Amrein, Krisztina
    Andelic, Nada
    Andreassen, Lasse
    Anke, Audny
    Antoni, Anna
    Audibert, Gerard
    Azouvi, Philippe
    Azzolini, Maria Luisa
    Bartels, Ronald
    Barzo, Pal
    Beauvais, Romuald
    Beer, Ronny
    Bellander, Bo-Michael
    Belli, Antonio
    Benali, Habib
    Berardino, Maurizio
    Beretta, Luigi
    Blaabjerg, Morten
    Bragge, Peter
    Brazinova, Alexandra
    Brinck, Vibeke
    Brooker, Joanne
    Brorsson, Camilla
    Buki, Andras
    Bullinger, Monika
    Cabeleira, Manuel
    Caccioppola, Alessio
    Calappi, Emiliana
    Calvi, Maria Rosa
    Cameron, Peter
    Lozano, Guillermo Carbayo
    Carbonara, Marco
    Cavallo, Simona
    Chevallard, Giorgio
    Chieregato, Arturo
    Ceyisakar, Iris
    Coburn, Mark
    Coles, Jonathan
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2020, 59 : 6 - 15