Intrapartum ultrasound and mother acceptance: A study with informed consent and questionnaire

被引:3
|
作者
Malvasi, Antonio [1 ,2 ]
Damiani, Gianluca Raffaello [1 ]
Vitagliano, Amerigo [1 ]
Dellino, Miriam [1 ]
Achiron, Reuven [3 ]
Ioannis, Kosmas [4 ]
Vimercati, Antonella [1 ]
Gaetani, Maria [1 ]
Cicinelli, Ettore [1 ]
Vinciguerra, Marina [1 ]
Ricci, Ilaria [1 ]
Tinelli, Andrea [2 ,5 ,6 ]
Baldini, Giorgio Maria [7 ]
Trojano, Giuseppe [8 ,9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bari Aldo Moro, Sch Med, Dept Biomed & Human Oncol Sci DIMO, Unit Obstet & Gynecol 1, I-70124 Bari, Italy
[2] Moscow Inst Phys & Technol, Fac Biol & Med Phys, Phystech BioMed Sch, Lab Human Physiol, Moscow 141701, Russia
[3] Sheba Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Prenatal Diagnost Unit, Tel Hashomer, Israel
[4] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Fac Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
[5] Veris Delli Ponti Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, I-73020 Scorrano, Lecce, Italy
[6] Vito Fazzi Hosp, Div Expt Endoscop Surg Imaging Technol & Minimally, I-73100 Lecce, Italy
[7] MOMO Fertilife IVF Ctr, I-76011 Bisceglie, Italy
[8] IRCCS Ist Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Dept Maternal, I-70124 Bari, Italy
[9] IRCCS Ist Tumori Giovanni Paolo II, Child Gynecol Oncol Unit, I-70124 Bari, Italy
[10] Madonna Grazie Hosp ASM, Hlth, I-75100 Matera, Italy
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY-X | 2023年 / 20卷
关键词
Visual biofeedback; Intrapartum ultrasonography; Informed consent; Labour; Obstetric violence; Discomfort; OCCIPUT POSTERIOR POSITION; HEAD-SYMPHYSIS DISTANCE; FETAL HEAD; TRANSPERINEAL ULTRASOUND; LABOR; SONOGRAPHY; EPISIOTOMY; OBSTETRICS; DIAGNOSE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100246
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction: Intrapartum ultrasound (IU) is used in the delivery ward; even if IU monitors the labouring women, it could be perceived as a discomfort and even as an" obstetric violence", because it is a young technique, not often well "accepted". A group of clinicians aimed at obtain an informed consent from patients, prior to perform a translabial ultrasound (TU). The aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptance of both translabial and transabdominal IU. Methods: In this study, performed at the University Hospital of Bari (Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology), were enrolled 103 patients in the first or second stage of labor in singleton cephalic presentation. A statistical frequency and an association analysis were performed. As a significant result, we consider the peace of mind/ satisfaction and the" obstetric violence". IU was performed both transabdominal and translabial to determine the presentation, head positions, angle of progression and head perineum distance. During the first and second stage of labor, the ASIUG questionnaires (Apulia study intrapartum ultrasonography group) were administered. Results: 74 (71, 84%) patients underwent IU and 29 had a vaginal examination (28, 15%). Significant less "violence" has been experienced with a IU (73 out 74/98, 65%) and only one person (1 /1, 35%) recorded that. On the contrary, 10 patients (10/29) perceived that "violence" (34, 48%) while 19 (65, 52%) did not respond on a similar way, after a vaginal examination (VE). More patients felt satisfaction (71 out 74/95, 95%) with the use of IU and only 3 (3/4, 05%) felt unease. A different picture was evident in the vaginal examination group. Only 17 patients (17 out 29/58, 62%) felt comfort while 12 (41, 38%) felt unease. Conclusions: In our study, IU use is well accepted by most of patients, because it could reassure women about their fetal condition. Moreover, they can see the fetus on the screen, while the obstetrician is performing the US and this is important for a visual feedback, in comparison with the classical VE.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Historical trends in the timing of informed consent for research into intrapartum complications
    Patel, D.
    Nasir, S.
    Elati, A.
    Vernon, G.
    Weeks, A. D.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 119 (03) : 361 - 365
  • [2] INFORMED CONSENT - QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY OF BRITISH OTOLARYNGOLOGISTS
    DAWES, PJD
    CLINICAL OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 1994, 19 (05): : 388 - 393
  • [3] Evaluation of informed consent in health research: a questionnaire survey
    Lansimies-Antikainen, Helena
    Laitinen, Tomi
    Rauramaa, Rainer
    Pietila, Anna-Maija
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, 2010, 24 (01) : 56 - 64
  • [4] Development and validation of informed consent for blood transfusion questionnaire
    Senin, Mohd Hilmi
    Sopian, Mastura Mohd
    Shaharuddin, Bakiah
    Nasir, Muhammad Jaffri Mohd
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF TRANSFUSION SCIENCE, 2024, 18 (01) : 35 - 44
  • [5] Informed consent document in gastrointestinal endoscopy:: understanding and acceptance by patients
    Vila, J. J.
    Jimenez, F. J.
    Inarrairaegui, M.
    Prieto, C.
    Nantes, O.
    Borda, F.
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 2006, 98 (02) : 101 - 106
  • [6] THE WRITTEN INFORMED CONSENT FORM (WICF): FACTORS THAT INTERFERE WITH ACCEPTANCE
    Souza, Miriam Karine
    Jacob, Carlos Eduardo
    Gama-Rodrigues, Joaquim
    Zilberstein, Bruno
    Cecconello, Ivan
    Habr-Gama, Angelita
    ABCD-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CIRURGIA DIGESTIVA-BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 26 (03): : 200 - 205
  • [7] Family roles in informed consent from the perspective of young Chinese doctors: a questionnaire study
    Hanhui Xu
    Mengci Yuan
    BMC Medical Ethics, 25
  • [8] Family roles in informed consent from the perspective of young Chinese doctors: a questionnaire study
    Xu, Hanhui
    Yuan, Mengci
    BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [9] Women's and midwives' views on the optimum process for informed consent for research in a feasibility study involving an intrapartum intervention: a qualitative study
    Alvarez, Mary
    Hotton, Emily J.
    Harding, Sam
    Ives, Jonathan
    Crofts, Joanna F.
    Wade, Julia
    PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIES, 2023, 9 (01)
  • [10] Women’s and midwives’ views on the optimum process for informed consent for research in a feasibility study involving an intrapartum intervention: a qualitative study
    Mary Alvarez
    Emily J. Hotton
    Sam Harding
    Jonathan Ives
    Joanna F. Crofts
    Julia Wade
    Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 9